![]() |
KVCD: LOTR Extended Edition on one CD-R!
:lol:
Hi all! I'm gonna experiment a little and I'm trying to put the 210 ( :!: :!: ) minutes of Lord Of The Rings 1 Extended Edition on one 99 min. CD-R. You might say this is impossible with an acceptable quality. However I want to try. Here's my question: What kind of script would you use for it. I think it might be a good idea to add blockbuster noise to the very end, to avoid DCT-blocks, and use a higher sharpening value, something like asharp(2.5,4) Do you think it would be a good idea to use the adaptive blockbuster filter also? or should I just leave it detail-adaptive, as it already is? thanks for replies! |
hi my friend
:) maybe with this values asharp(2.5,4), the image can stay very "brilliant" and maybe "negative" in the edges. :? blockbuster noise is a good choice but CQ will decrease too much after prediction. your only problem will be the low CQ. |
Hey Jellygoose,
I think you can use the current script just as it is, but I would use 352x480(576) because that's a very long movie :!: Do a file prediction at 352x480(576) and see how the sample comes out. I'm pretty sure it will make it :) -kwag |
I forgot, I actually planned to use 352x288 PAL VCD resolution for it... I'll run some prediction tests later tonight, and will compare both resolutions!
This is so much fun! :D |
352x288 Jellygoose?
will be cool of course, you will got good CQ with the corrent script :!: :D |
just reading this makes me want to experiment with the extended version but I will aim at putting it on 1 80min cd, lets see what the pair of us can do eh.
|
well I fell at the first hurdle, after prediction I got a cq value of 0.958 quality was so bad I gave up.
|
Quote:
You should be able to put that on one CD at that resolution, because I put "The Green Mile" (180 minutes) on one CD with the LBR :!: CQ was up in the 50's. -kwag |
Can someone give me a good blockbuster line for this purpose please?
|
Quote:
BlockBuster(method="noise", detail_min=1, detail_max=10, variance=0.7, seed=5823 ) That's for 352x240(288). Try it on a small clip first :idea: -kwag |
Thanks. Right now I'm still doing tests for 352x576, and results are promising :D
However I have some problems with prediciton, because the film is on 2 DVDs... I would actually join the Vobs, but I need subtitles on both DVDs, and they would get out of sync I think :roll: I can't even load both .d2v files into one AviSynth Script because of the Subtitles I think. Because I would need two VobSub lines, and the subtitles for both DVDs start at 0 minutes of course... get that? |
You're going to have to use Vobedit and Ifoedit to create a joined set of VOBs. Then you can tackle the task of encoding it :)
-kwag |
:idea: You know I can't wait kwag!! :D
What I'll do is just use ToK with the first DVD, then with the second, and just use half of the factor I'd use for a normal encode. Later I join the 2 files to 1 MPEG... :wink: I know this is the dirtiest method to do this, but right now it works... What I can say right now is this: Static Scenes just look 8O for that length of a movie... when it comes to action, it gets blocky. :cry: Artifacts around objects also concern me... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I get a CQ of 77.3 @ 352x288 resolution. But that's for a 99 min. CD-R and with 96kb audio... However, picture really looks ok for that length...
did you say ONLY 219 min. ?? 8O What movies do you usually watch? |
Results:
Ok, I wasn't really satisfied with my results for this movie, when I watched it on my computer monitor! I could clearly see that blocks showed up on high action scenes, the whole image seemed very soft (thus the resolution was only 352x288) and the worst thing was that I couldn't get rid of the artifacts around objects. However, I burnt it on CD and watched it on the standalone and the results were simply 8O 8O 8O :D :D :D I couldn't believe that this quality was achieved for 210 min. on a 99 min. CD-R. The picture looked way better than on the computer monitor. I know this is always the case, but the lower the resolution is, it seems to me the better artifacts are compensated by the DVD player. The artifacts around the objects were simply GONE!! :D Even the image looked to me a LOT sharper than it seemed on the computer monitor!! Now it's not that the whole image is soft, but only background scenes are of less detail. That doesn't bother me at all... I'll post a sample later on, and you guys can watch it!! 8) |
@JellyGoose
Is your DVD player progressive? -Yoda |
Quote:
If your question is if the player shows interlaced video or not, then no, there are no horizontal lines... 8) |
@Jellygoose,
Can we see your script??? ************************************ The Devil.....is always.....in the Details! |
a better question is how big is your TV?
I progressive scan player will not magically remove compression artificats |
Unless Jellygoose's DVD player has a built in "Faroudja" video processor, and then it does indeed remove artifacts in real time from the picture.
-kwag |
I have a Faroudja processor in my panasonic player, but I still see artifacts in low detail areas or maybe I'm confusing artifacts with dct blocks?
|
Yes, me too!. I use the progressive output from the Panasonic into a Samsung 32" HDTV, and I can see DCT blocks even on DVDs :lol:
Edit: I mean I use "Component" output to the HDTV :roll: -kwag |
Yup. Funny you should mention that. In some ways HDTV is bad because combined with a good progressive player you even see flaws in real DVDs and it enhances those on our compressed KVCDs.
On another note a brief story from last night. I have a 50" widescreen which shows lots of detail and I told my girlfriend I her to watch this KVCD encode of Arlington Road I did to see what she thought about the quality. Well I put it in (it was a 2CD encode of 117 minutes 704_480 that came out to 79CQ) About 5 minutes into it she said.. "So when are you going to put your encoded copy in so I can compare?" I said "This is the encoded and compressed copy!!!". She didn't even notice although my overly critical eyes saw the dct blocks and some banding :D :D :D |
I have a Cyberhome ADL-528 Player, and a 74cm regular TV set. We use the metric system, so don't know how many inches...
Here's the script I used: Code:
## DLL Section ## |
High Definition Television. Capable of accepting digital and progressive scan content.
|
how would I know if I had a HDTV, or my dvd player has a Faroudja processor?
|
|
cheers
|
@Jellygoose
How did you manage to get such a high CQ value? When I runs ToK prediction the CQ lands somewhere between 4 and 5 8O !!! And how did you fix the subs? I want subs in my encode too but I haven't got a clue on how to pull it off since the movie lies on 2 DVD's... Help me out, please. |
u got a cq of 4 or 5 8O I could only get a cq of 0.956, jelly pls do share with us how u got subs.
|
8O 8O
Yu guys must be doing something wrong then I'm sure. There's no magic or something with the CQ. I used 352x288 resolution, Bilinear Resize, and Letterbox(0,0,16,16). CQ was around 70 as I recall... That was with Minimum Bitrate 0 and Max Bitrate 1900kb/sec I suppose. Also the audio was only at 96kb/sec to save some bits. Well as for the subs, I used the simple way. :wink: I ripped both DVDs and made 2 d2v files. After that I extracted the Subs from both DVDs with VobSub, and encoded both parts with Subs seperately. I used ToK to calculate the right CQ. I just used half the factor I usually use, and finally aimed for a slightly larger size for the first CD. After that I muxed both files seperately and joined the 2 files in TMPGEnc. :roll: Simple, but it worked. :D |
ah right, I processed ripped vob files through dvd2svcd got it rto extract subs, then I got the avs script and took out the bits for subs and it didn't work for some reason. I have done this before and it has worked in the past but for some reason now its now.
|
@Jellygoose,
Okay, I'll give it a shot again! With the latest script of course! :D (This surely got wierd. I mean having to jump back and forth between these two threads. But, I'm to blame :oops: since I posted the same question as you... :? Sorry for that... |
No problem, it's hard to read every single thread here... 8)
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.