why dual-channel ?
I saw somewhere in this forum this kwag's post:
Quote:
|
Re: why dual-channel ?
Quote:
The original templates were encoded as joint. That's why I changed to "Dual Channel". And I believe there is a correction to be made in the statement above, which I had taken from a quote in another site. Dual Channel is exactly the same as stereo, as far as bit rate and quality. But in dual channel, each channel is 100% completely independent. It's actually two mono channels. One left, one right. In stereo, there are some Left Right differences that "bleed" from channel to channel or "cross talk". Not so in Dual Channel mode. kwag |
Re: why dual-channel ?
Quote:
So, if I don't want dolby surround information, it would be better to use joint stereo? This way I will get more quality (+ bit rate) with the same size, but loose the dolby surround. Is that right? Just one more newbie question... Whem I decode ac3 --> wav, did't I loose the dolby surround information? :roll: |
Re: why dual-channel ?
Quote:
If you use DVD2AVI, and select "downmix", you'll get your surround in the WAV file. If you use something like "headac3he", you'll also preserve your surround sound. Any Dolby Pro logic receiver will decode the surround sound in your encoded (xyzK)VCD. :wink: kwag |
Kwag,
Where can I select the "downmix" option in DVD2AVI, all I can see is under "audio" tap, under "Dobly Digital" tap, there are options like demux, demux all tracks and decode. Which one is to preserve the surround sound effect in WAV file?? Sorry, I found it. Should I select "demux" or "decode" then?? |
Select decode.
kwag |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.