can i got adjusts to CQ 100 ?
hy Kwag,
please,only you can answer this: can i change some line in CQMatic to got the max CQ if needed :?: i'm encoding for 2 cds and using audio bitrate from 160 to 250, and it will give me CQ from 90 to 100! thanks in advance! :) |
Quote:
my question is clear...! for the reason that i ask..., just the reason that you answer: i want more than CQ90 to encrease the final size cos will let left more than 100mb in some cases in each cds. oh....when you think in audio size/bitrate: yes, i have 100mb free using audio at 320-48k in each cd. again......how can i change some line to got the max CQ prediction between 90 and 100... :arrow: IF NEEDED :?: :roll: |
Quote:
|
can't Phil?
8O maybe is possible. Kwag.....help. a months ago ToK sometimes encrease the CQ to 100 and after hedix change "something" in the program,put the limit to CQ 90! CQMatic work like ToK? of course have a way?!?!?! :? |
It's set as a MAX of 90, because there's no more visual quality gained over that. It's a waste of space going over 90 :!:
Use the extra space left to increase your audio bitrate ;) -kwag |
Quote:
|
If I enable CQ finding between 90 and 100, it might take another 5 to 10 iterations to find CQ, because of the non-linearity of TMPEG :!:
I don't think anyone wants that :roll: -kwag |
ok,ok,
like Avalon wrote,like phil wrote, like kwag wrote! i know my friends! :arrow: now please,listen to me: using audio bitrate 320 at 48k and CQ90 i have :arrow: 100mb FREE in each cd :!: IF the prediction could give me more than CQ90, something between CQ90 and CQ100 i will use this FREE space to encode the video cos i can't encrease more the audio...is in the max bitrate! Phil wrote: " Only Kwag can do it for you" :lol: yes,i know! please Kwag, is possible? ps: my english is very horrible. for me ,i'm only repeating the same question in the first post. :? :? only observations...not important! :wink: :roll: |
Quote:
You won't see any better quality, so you're just filling 100MB of data that won't be used for anything :!: And the time spent to find CQ between 90 and 100, will cost a very long time :!: -kwag |
i know how you're "feeling"!
:lol: seems "stup" but i want it cos i'm thinking "strange ideas"... i can't explain it now...need tests. if this ideas works will be great for me. the very long time to find the CQ value isn't important for me, i can wait! :lol: Kwag, if is easy,please help me, if is hard for me(not for you) to make it, then forget! :wink: |
8)
Kwag send me a "very special CQMatic private version". is called: :arrow: CQMatic 1.2.00-Jorel and the best is: :arrow: Goes up to CQ=100 :wink: see the first log after find prediction for small sample: http://www.kvcd.net CQMatic Version 1.2.00-Jorel Copyright Softronex Corporation, 2003. All rights reserved. Time: 22:10:22 Date: 09/01/2003 Ready! Project: C:\CQMatic\la1.tpr Creating: CQMatic.tpr D:\La Luna\ToK\2\la1.m2v Project resolution: 480x480 Execute. Movie Time: 43 Average Bitrate: 2375 Prediction Only mode Executing Prediction Phase... Process started at 22:11:09 On 09/01/2003 Setting up initial sampling. Using CQ of 80.00 Prediction cycle #1 Encoder started... Process time: 5.98 minutes. Encoder end. File size difference = 1.410935 Low fence: 80.000000 High fence: 100.000000 Last CQ = 80.00 Current CQ = 90.00 CQ difference = 10.000000 Using CQ of 90.00 Prediction cycle #2 Encoder started... Process time: 5.80 minutes. Encoder end. File size difference = 1.115524 Low fence: 90.000000 High fence: 100.000000 Last CQ = 90.00 Current CQ = 95.00 CQ difference = 5.000000 Using CQ of 95.00 Prediction cycle #3 Encoder started... Process time: 5.55 minutes. Encoder end. File size difference = 1.011960 Low fence: 95.000000 High fence: 100.000000 Last CQ = 95.00 Current CQ = 96.14 CQ difference = 1.136154 Using CQ of 96.14 Prediction cycle #4 Encoder started... Process time: 5.52 minutes. Encoder end. Final CQ value is 96.14 CQMatic complete! Total minutes of process: 22.85 Process ended at 22:34:00 On 09/01/2003 :arrow: Final CQ value is 96.14 :D :D working perfect,of course! THANKS KWAG, YOU'RE THE BEST! :drunkard: :ole: :mrgreen: ps: if someone want this version, just send me pm with the e-mail! :wink: |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.