digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] - Encoders cannot recognize audio data in AVS script?

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)

- Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)

- - Encoders cannot recognize audio data in AVS script? (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/8316-encoders-cannot-recognize.html)

Just downloaded HeadAC3he, it doesn't support AVI files unfortunately. It'll be more convenient if there is AVI support and batch processing so i don't have to extract WAV from my AVIs and I have too many short clips.

Use besweet and BesweetGui : you will have a batch support, and it can handle directly avi (you have to load a dll called VOBinput for that - I know the name is weird :-))

I don't know if u don't have a problem anymore about audio file but i have the same than you. I didn't success to work it but i find a solution : demux the audio from your file and get in audio source in TMPGEnc. In audio source you get the avs and it works.

In other words, what I suggested to you by mail works. Good news :-)

My problem is solved, TMPGEnc and Mainconcept now recognizes the audio data of AVS scripts. Not very sure but the solution is but I did reinstall several MPEG-4 codecs and a software call Advanced Encode Decode tools.

From now I won't answer any questions that are splitted into more than one post. We asked you twice to make an effort for that and you didn't. This way you would perhaps try.

Sorry.

Can a moderator join all my posts into one? Actually these post have different topics. I thought it would be better to seperate them so when people do SEARCH, they don't have to look through 5-8 pages of a single topic title to find the question and answer they needed since SEARCH does not single out the specific page.
Like when I do SEARCH on a few keywords and SEARCH report the results, one of the result has a topic title irrelevant to my keywords and has 5 pages of replies. It kinna scares people away if they have to read a whole log of several days of conversation to find the question they're asking and they don't always find the question. If the topics are seperated and keywords appear in the topic title/1st reply, it's like hitting a bull's eye. This is how I first thought.
The fact is people rather post their questions than do their own RE-SEARCH. If the results are organized badly or if there is too much irrelevant information, people tend to give up and just wait for a reply to their posts.

I have deleted the question. It's a different topic now. It's about besweet, I'll transfer it to the right forum.