Falcon Media (FTI) DVD+R DL outstanding scan quality
 

Dear Friends. Im New Here . I Saw A Chart Of Digitalfaq Rated Blank Medias
I Saw That FTI Was In The Second Class .
I Think It Is Unfair . I Believe For Now And Future The Falcon Media Products Are The Best And We Cant Find The Products Like Them. I Dont Have Bias On Anything I Test MySelf IF That Was Good I Will Raise It And If Was Bad I'll Punish It . I Am A Wholesaler And Duplication Man . Used Over Mitsubishi Ritek MBI FTI China Taiwan Products ..... .

I Have Some Tests That Put Here:

Maxtec DVD+R DL Tested 2.4X Overburned 4X and 6X
Falcon Media Pro DVD-R Glossy Inkjet Written 16X And Tested 16X

Falcon Media Pro DVD-R Written 16X Tested 16X
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1408516498

Maxtec DVD+R DL Third Class Falcon Product Overburned 8334MB Writen 2.4X tested 8X
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1408516498

Maxtec DVD+R DL Written 4X Tested 12X
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1408516498

Maxtec DVD+R DL Written 6X Tested 12X
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1408516498

Scans alone are NOT how discs are judged. :wink2:

FTI media has
- a higher coaster count
- inconsistent production quality
- reflectivity issues -aka- compatibility with readers/players and burners

It's very good media, yes. But it does not belong in that top tier of 95%+ near-perfect media.

Dear Sir,
Im Duplication Man Duplicated Over 100K DVD+R DL Not Even One Returned Product
inconsistent is somehow Acceptable in 1000 only 10 pcs may be fail to burn

Returned products is NOT a proper test. :no2:

Be Sure In MY Country When A Thing Wont Work IT Will Be Returned .
Im Not Here TO Show Any Bias. I'dont Have Bias On This Products I Use The Best . I Believe This.
One OF Lesson In Business Is If You Make Good Quality Products With Their Brand Make Better Quality For Your Own Brand Like Verbatim Made By FTI

Dear Sir Would You Please Tell Me When Was The Last Time You Put Under Test?

Do Have Any Beatable Result Of Worldwide Media ? Show Me.

Written Sony AD-5280S-CB-Plus 4X Tested 16X

http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1409212111


Written Sony AD-5280S-CB-Plus 8X Tested 16X

http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1409212111

I'm not sure than a OptiArc is going to give you reliable scans. :hmm:

And Here With Honorable Mention Test

http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1409297556

Is that an FTI with TTH02 "fake" media ID? :hmm:

no sir . FTI Owned TDK Code And All Of CD DVD BD Standard And Pro Line WIll Be TDK Media Codes.
FTI Media Code Will Be Use For DVD+R DL.

Thats Better TO Say Thats A FTI DISC With Licensed TDK Media Code.
The Scan Proof It Can Perform Better Than Other Discs

Hi all,

First post here but many of you will know me from other similar forums elsewhere on the web. I have recently acquired some "FalconMedia Pro" CD and DVD media and can honestly say that this media is some of the best I have EVER used, no ifs, no buts. The discs physically look to be of a very high quality construction with smooth edges, a wonderful inkjet surface (if specified) and the dye looks consistent and without blemishes. Falcon Technologies International (FTI) uses TDK and Mitsubishi stampers, ATIP/MID and dye technologies under license. Falcon CD-Rs have ATIP = 97m15s05f and DVD-Rs have MID = TTH02. In both cases, the quality of the product exceeds that of what previously came out of the Japan, USA and Luxembourg plants based on my very own testing methodology. That having said, I also have some packs of Falcon "Corporate" DVD-R that returns results similar to that of Taiyo Yuden's "OEM" or "ValuLine" range - not bad but not great either, but at least they're being passed off as a lower grade product. A testament to the quality of FTI media is the fact that even Verbatim are using their services to produce their "UltraLife" range of CD-R media.

Hope that helps.

Another Unbeatable Honorable Mention Test.
Falcon Media Pro DVD-R TTH02
Written 16X Tested 6X :-o
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1410801426

What is your "very own testing methodology"?

I purchase a quantity of any given media and write two pieces - one at rated speed and one at maximum CLV speed (usually 6X) on each of my main writers (currently includes the Pioneer BDR-209, Pioneer BDC-S02, Sony Optiarc AD-7240S, Plextor PX-755SA, LiteON LH-20A4P and BenQ DW1640). I then run a TRT on at least one of my drives with poorer error correction capabilities and then parity testing is performed with the abovementioned Plextor, LiteON and BenQ drives using recommended standards (e.g. 4X/1ECC for LiteON, 8X/8ECC BenQ, QPxTool defaults for Plextor). Is that thorough enough for you? :)

Thank you. Have any studies (like China Lake) been conducted where Falcon Media DVDs were used?

Honestly, I don't believe that many optical media-related studies have been carried out over the past decade or so, since optical storage is more or less a known quality. I've been involved with optical storage since the late-1990s when CD recordable technology became popular in my country and have a vast collection of media as well as drives, both old and new. Many of my long-term results contradict the results from 'official' performance tests (e.g. cyanine CD-Rs not lasting as long as phthalocyanine CD-Rs is a myth IMO) but generally, I have found that the longevity of optical storage media depends on the manufacturer and its tolerances more so than the dye type used, and of course also long-term storage conditions. One of my earliest-recorded CD-Rs, a Sony CDQ-74BN from 1997 made by Taiyo Yuden (gold reflective layer, cyanine dye), is still not only fully readable on today's high-speed readers, but has very low parity errors, as if it had just been written today.