Video conversion vs forklifts - another weird email
Today this was waiting in my inbox:
Quote:
Most of the weird ones are people who get all pissy and whiny about the usage of certain words, or have taken offense to a reference or analogy. I'm instantly reminded of two comparable situations, to help illustrate:
I honestly think some people look for ways to be offended. So let me address the topic of forklifts vs video conversion... For starters, I have no idea which article or page this person is referring to. Between the forum and main site, there are thousands of pages at digitalFAQ.com. Why is it that complaints are always vague? Furthermore, quality video work requires a deep understanding of video theory and technology, mixed with an ability to apply it. Sure, anybody can "attempt" to convert video, but most of them do a poor job. At any given moment, dozens of factors have to be considered, weighed, and decisions based on those unique factors. No two videos are ever the same. It takes many months, sometimes years, to fully comprehend video conversion. Anybody could attempt to drive a forklift, too, but that doesn't mean they'll do it correctly. But the difference between a forklift and video, is that operating a forklift is a manual task that requires just a few hours of instruction (at most), and is largely repetitive work. It requires no deep knowledge of theory and science, and is not a task riddled with variables. So regardless of where that text appears, it seems like a fair contrast comparison to me. I usually don't reply to emails like this. As of a couple of months ago, I'll just share them here for community amusement, with some commentary. So on that note, enjoy. :thumb: |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.