![]() |
Best capture method for PAL, NTSC, upscale VHS?
Hello,
Iīm Gaston from Argentina. I read the forum for months now, but i still have a few questions. Iībeen digitizing all the family memories, and now itīs the time for tapes. We have about a hunred VHS-C tapes half of them in PAL and half in NTSC, for PAL i have a Panasonic AG-4700 (S-vhs out and field TBC), but for NTSC i could only find a JVC HR-ES8006UM (S-VHS out but no line TBC). 1. I read LordSmurf saying that JVC decks tends to jam the tapes on VHS-C adapters. How often that happens? It worth the risk? I have a JVC C-P6U adapter. 2. Do you recomend upscaling the analog signal (with a s-vhs to HDMI adapter for example)? Or itīs better doing it later in software? (or maybe wait to AI filters to improve)? 3. What capture device gives the best quality? (i could use an old computer if need it) 4. Where i can find that capture device? 5. All Datavideo TBC-100 or 1000 are PAL And NTSC? Someone has one for sale? 6. Someone has a NTSC S-VHS deck with TBC for sale? 7. Many, Many thanks!!! Gastón. |
I can provide answers to following questions.
Quote:
3. The best answer will be "it depends" :). In general DV and the component, devices will give you the "best quality" but I read a few posts where people claim that composite gives the best results for some of the cases. 4. Well unfortunately you can find it only in this forum and Online second-hand services like eBay, Amazon etc. (If you need something trusty then this forum is probably the best place). My advice for you will be ( like Matrix): Please stop trying to catch the rabbit :). We all want to get best possible quality from our VHS/analog cassettes but it's simply impossible to do from SD a 4K super picture. I saw these magic videos that show AI does all for you and makes SD a new 4k. I will tell you that it's just a bulls#*t. I played with Topaz and other AI software and ok in some of the cases they do the job but it's very specific scenes in the whole movie and the rest will have some kind of artefacts that just look stupid to me. For me getting the top lane external TBC is just over my budget so I get a nice VCR with TBC and then Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle to capture and to some extent I'm happy with the results but I still trying to get better gear. If you are from US you are lucky since there is a bigger market for this equipment I stuck with EU market since when I find some nice offer then there is no shipment to Poland :(. sorry for my crappy English but I hope you get my point. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The C-P6U is perfect, same as the C-P7U that I always suggest, and have for 20 years now. There are several Matsushita (then parent of both JVC and Panasonic) powered adapters, but the JVC/Victor are usually the best. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I may have an extra AGP card here (with TBSC), recently found two in a drawer, need to test. Not sure why those were there. I sort of think those were my personal AGP cards from over a decade ago, before I did some complex upgrades. Quote:
In this thread, this is trivia, as S-VHS decks with line TBC will be used... The auto-switching nature of DataVideo can get in the way when using VCRs without line TBCs. Bad spots on the tape, no line correction, can confuse the TBC into switching format. The Cypress are set manually, not automagic. Quote:
Quote:
And it's not just "no perfect method", but most are truly terrible and destructive, barfing artifacts everywhere. The problem with "upscaling" is that it blends simple upsize with sharpening, anti-aliasing (or alias adding, yuck!), and interpolation (the "creating data"). It can be a nightmare, with the output being unviewable trash, Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Overall lousy to watch, not enjoyable whatsoever, distracting artifacts. Quote:
But remember: buy it, use it, resell it, quality gear holds values. Crap gear is yours forever, no recoup of funds. Quote:
Not everybody is a xenophobe. I enjoyed making friend and contacts worldwide for decades now. |
Resizing in software is always better than hardware upscaling, Software does it at slow pace frame by frame, the high quality ones work at around 10 frames a second, Hardware upscaling is done in real time so compromises have to be made especially if the hardware is low quality like some cheap 4k TV's. Having said all that always keep the master files at their native interlaced resolution 720x480/576.
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.