#1  
01-12-2025, 02:03 PM
illicit1 illicit1 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 16
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When using a DV device to transfer raw data over firewire, does the device make a difference in the picture/quality of that raw data in the dv file?

For instance, should I expect any difference between sending a VHS tape through a Canon HV40 Camcorder vs a Sony HVR-M35U recorder?
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
01-12-2025, 02:44 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,462
Thanked 2,624 Times in 2,233 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by illicit1 View Post
When using a DV device to transfer raw data over firewire, does the device make a difference in the picture/quality of that raw data in the dv file?
For instance, should I expect any difference between sending a VHS tape through a Canon HV40 Camcorder vs a Sony HVR-M35U recorder?
Yes, it compresses the color to 4:1:1 (NTSC) or 4:2:0 (PAL).
- For PAL, it's lossy like DVD-Video.
- For NTSC, it's unacceptably noticeably lossy, to the point where colors get tint shifted (grandma gets a sunburn in Christmas videos, etc).

Most DV devices also lack any TBCs, and will thus bake-in wiggly image errors, dropouts, or audio sync errors.

DV is 1990s technology, and pre-dates 2000s lossless methods still used in the 2020s. In tech terms, it's not just old, but damned old/ancient.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
01-12-2025, 03:14 PM
illicit1 illicit1 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 16
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordsmurf View Post
Yes, it compresses the color to 4:1:1 (NTSC) or 4:2:0 (PAL).
- For PAL, it's lossy like DVD-Video.
- For NTSC, it's unacceptably noticeably lossy, to the point where colors get tint shifted (grandma gets a sunburn in Christmas videos, etc).

Most DV devices also lack any TBCs, and will thus bake-in wiggly image errors, dropouts, or audio sync errors.

DV is 1990s technology, and pre-dates 2000s lossless methods still used in the 2020s. In tech terms, it's not just old, but damned old/ancient.

I understand that, I'm specifically asking if the passthrough devices themselves make any difference. Or would video through each device look the same.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
01-12-2025, 06:01 PM
latreche34 latreche34 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,668
Thanked 636 Times in 584 Posts
He just explained to you that, VHS is analog, there is no such lossless passthrough, The DV device has to convert the analog video to digital then encode it to DV and output it over firewire, The problem is not in the conversion to digital, but rather in the encoding to DV, If you want to just convert VHS to digital without the DV encoding step you will need to use an analog capture device that can spit out digital YUV 4:2:2 into AVI files. Hope this helps.

https://www.youtube.com/@Capturing-Memories/videos
Reply With Quote
  #5  
01-12-2025, 06:16 PM
illicit1 illicit1 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 16
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seems like I wasn’t being very clear. I’m just inquiring if there is some standard being used here during encoding or if different devices used as a pass through provide different video output when viewing the raw video. Still not clear on that.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
01-12-2025, 06:47 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,462
Thanked 2,624 Times in 2,233 Posts
"passthrough" has two meanings

1. The signal passes through with zero changes. Nothing does this. Everything is always processed in some way. At best, it's passed with minimal changes (and that's NOT a good thing).

2. The signal passes through with use of on-device filters/TBCs/whatever. This is a rare feature, as most passthrough devices "bypass" the features (aka "passed with minimal changes). So, for example, not all DVD recorders have passthrough, only specific models like Panasonic ES10/15.

DV cameras used to "transfer" are outputting compressed DV, period.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
  #7  
01-12-2025, 06:53 PM
illicit1 illicit1 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 16
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So is the compressed video vastly different between 2 different devices? Such as the two mentioned in the OP? Does seem like it’s probably best at this point to just try it and find out.

Thanks for all your help, always appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
01-12-2025, 06:56 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,462
Thanked 2,624 Times in 2,233 Posts
For NTSC, yes, noticeably different, even to half-blind grandmas (literally). Color tends to be desaturated, tint shifts, etc. The color is compressed down to 25%. It's harsh.

For PAL, it mostly appears a bit soft, like a DVD-Video on a modern display.

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
  #9  
01-12-2025, 07:12 PM
latreche34 latreche34 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,668
Thanked 636 Times in 584 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by illicit1 View Post
Seems like I wasn’t being very clear. I’m just inquiring if there is some standard being used here during encoding or if different devices used as a pass through provide different video output when viewing the raw video. Still not clear on that.

Thanks
That is a design question, Even though DV devices and camcorders output legal DV AVI, I've seen differences in the way the analog video gets processed, Some are known to produce brighter images with blown out whites, some have darker look, Some have chroma shift, some even have weird artifacts like horizontal lines and color bands, So the short answer to your question is yes, there are differences in those claimed "passthrough" devices. But mostly consumer camcorders, I've seen good images from pro devices and DV boxes, albeit DV compressed.
Reply With Quote
The following users thank latreche34 for this useful post: illicit1 (01-13-2025), lordsmurf (01-12-2025)
  #10  
01-12-2025, 08:16 PM
aramkolt aramkolt is online now
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 687
Thanked 109 Times in 101 Posts
There are quite a variety of DV hardware encoders I know of:

Standalone Sony DV converters like the Sony DVMC-DA2
MiniDV/Digital8 players with screens - they are probably similar to camcorders, but can't say for sure.
Canopus products like the ADVC100/110
MiniDV/D8 camera encoding via line in - a few brands can likely do that such as Sony, Sharp, Canon, Panasonic
Datavideo standalone DV capture devices that have analog inputs.
Professional DV playback decks - I've seen these from panasonic, JVC, and Sony - I'm sure there are others.


As for which is best, I've never seen much of a direct comparison to show if one is any better than the others. What you'd be looking for is color accuracy and if they like to clip high or low values. The Canopus can be set to not clip at low IRE levels by setting the black level to 0IRE instead of the usual 7.5 for NTSC. I haven't seen more than maybe two devices compared together at once which isn't going to tell you a whole lot as to which is "best".
Reply With Quote
The following users thank aramkolt for this useful post: illicit1 (01-13-2025)
  #11  
01-13-2025, 11:33 AM
illicit1 illicit1 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 16
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by latreche34 View Post
That is a design question, Even though DV devices and camcorders output legal DV AVI, I've seen differences in the way the analog video gets processed, Some are known to produce brighter images with blown out whites, some have darker look, Some have chroma shift, some even have weird artifacts like horizontal lines and color bands, So the short answer to your question is yes, there are differences in those claimed "passthrough" devices. But mostly consumer camcorders, I've seen good images from pro devices and DV boxes, albeit DV compressed.
Ahh, thank you! This answers my question. I meant to give this a shot last night between a few devices I have but of course, can't find a power cable for one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aramkolt View Post
There are quite a variety of DV hardware encoders I know of:

Standalone Sony DV converters like the Sony DVMC-DA2
MiniDV/Digital8 players with screens - they are probably similar to camcorders, but can't say for sure.
Canopus products like the ADVC100/110
MiniDV/D8 camera encoding via line in - a few brands can likely do that such as Sony, Sharp, Canon, Panasonic
Datavideo standalone DV capture devices that have analog inputs.
Professional DV playback decks - I've seen these from panasonic, JVC, and Sony - I'm sure there are others.


As for which is best, I've never seen much of a direct comparison to show if one is any better than the others. What you'd be looking for is color accuracy and if they like to clip high or low values. The Canopus can be set to not clip at low IRE levels by setting the black level to 0IRE instead of the usual 7.5 for NTSC. I haven't seen more than maybe two devices compared together at once which isn't going to tell you a whole lot as to which is "best".
Thank you! For now, I'm sending video through a Sony DV device from a AG-1960(I know, no tbc) and the color slider has been very helpful in at least toning down the apparent heightened reds/purples.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DV vs. lossless differences in colorspace? Aya_Rei Capture, Record, Transfer 14 10-07-2024 04:44 PM
JVC VCR EK, EG, and E differences? FrodoGuy85 General Discussion 2 04-02-2023 05:19 AM
TBC differences on DVHS decks? AndyO6322 Capture, Record, Transfer 3 04-22-2013 12:14 AM
BVP-4 vs. BVP-4 Plus major differences? Tuco Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 14 05-23-2011 08:27 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM