![]() |
PAL aspect, resolution correct on this file?
1 Attachment(s)
It's a PAL SD capture from VHS
Does the pixel aspect and resolution look to be OK given it's PAL SD? Thanks! |
Looks like nightmare. I believe pixel aspect and resolution has no attention to this. Sorry, it is my opinion only :)
|
Something seems a bit off - usually the capture resolution would be 720x576 and PAL generally should look quite a bit better than NTSC because it has quite a bit more vertical resolution (576 vs 480). Also appears that black borders were added, possibly to maybe mask uneven edges? Was this an S-Video or Composite capture? Image itself seems pretty noisy, but that could
What is the full capture chain used? Is this a original commercially produced tape (in other words, not a copy of an original tape)? What is the tape speed (SP vs LP/SLP/EP)? |
Welcome back. :)
Quote:
- There was clearly no line TBC used on capture, no NR. - It appears that a deinterlace has caused jaggies in the text, though that may also be a side effect of the TBC-less capture (as even QTGMC cannot overcome all issues). The frame rate is 24.763, which is wrong for anything. Use MediaInfo to confirm. Resolution is a wrong 702x576 -- not the correct 720x576 zero-two vs. two-zero It's impossible to ascertain aspect ratio (AR) from this sample. But my instinct is "no", because there is a glaring offset on the left side, likely even some stretching. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
The frame rate of slightly less than 25 fps suggests that the capture device was dropping frames -- typical of cheap devices that try to shove uncompressed video through USB 2.0.
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.