digitalFAQ.com Forum

digitalFAQ.com Forum (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/)
-   Capture, Record, Transfer (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/video-capture/)
-   -   Faulty TBC issue? AVT-8710 insert frames? (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/video-capture/8001-faulty-tbc-issue.html)

jt_retro 05-11-2017 10:47 PM

Faulty TBC issue? AVT-8710 insert frames?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi All

I've just received an AVT-8710. I've heard about some problems with these units.

I have a Panasonic VCR, and I went in to the menu system to see what the TBC did to it.

I've attached the result. The background artifacts (darker horizontal and vertical bars) seem to be difference each time I close and bring up the menu.

Is this a faulty unit? Should I send it back?

Thanks

sanlyn 05-13-2017 07:54 PM

Occasionally I saw the shown effect over the years, perhaps once in 100 captures, solved by rebooting the unit and making certain the correct "system" setting (PAL, NTSC, etc) was lighted in the LED panels. If those procedures don't allow your unit to lock into the signal completely, you have a defective unit.

jt_retro 05-22-2017 10:48 AM

My unit also loose sync and stays locked now after about 10 minutes of use - I hope it's just an overheating issue as I left it on overnight.....

It's also inserting some light moving noise in to the picture (although you don't really notice it with the usual VHS noise)

I'm also getting "Inserted frames" in virtualdub from time to time - usually about 10 at a time every 30-45 mins or so.

I might have to send mine back...

sanlyn 05-22-2017 11:44 AM

You don't normally get a notice about inserted frames from Virtualdub unless you enable that feature in the capture timing options setup. http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...html#post45242

sample dialog setup of various settings from section 5 linked above (this one is normally for AIW AGP cards with an external tbc in circuit). There are different recommendations discussed for USB devices.
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...capture-timing

jt_retro 05-22-2017 11:58 AM

Should I disable those top 2 options? In the link, it says I should avoid this by using a TBC (which I am, although it's currently faulty!), but I'm not sure I should still use these or not? I note that you say that even the best TBC will have a few errors.

sanlyn 05-22-2017 12:39 PM

Try a short capture with the options shown, then examine the results. All capture devices won't use exactly the same options, and some tapes will need special attention. I'm not up on which capture device or player you're using. By disabling most VDub options you'll be able to see how the TBC itself performs without VDub making adjustments. The options shown are what I use with an AVT-8710 and either the AIW 7500 or AIW 9600XT, also recommended for the AIW 9800. I use different options in Win7 for my Diamond VC500 USB, turning off all audio resync options.

jt_retro 05-22-2017 02:34 PM

Thanks, that's good advice :)

My VCR is a Panasonic NV-HS930 and my capture device is a Hauppauge USB-Live2.

I'd be grateful if you could explain to me why you think I am seeing Inserted frames? The thing is, is that if I simply re-play the tape, it will probably be fine the second time, so it's not a tape issue.

Do you think it's just the AVT being a little inaccurate with it's output signal timing, trigging Virtualdub's insert threshold (whatever that maybe) ?

I guess I should try without the AVT and see if the figures are worse/better...

BTW, call me crazy, but I think my AVT is working better (it hasn't locked up in 20 mins so far!) by placing is on a packet of frozen peas.... :D

sanlyn 05-22-2017 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49472)
I'd be grateful if you could explain to me why you think I am seeing Inserted frames?

Isn't that what you said in post #3?
Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49467)
I'm also getting "Inserted frames" in virtualdub from time to time - usually about 10 at a time every 30-45 mins or so.


jt_retro 05-22-2017 02:54 PM

But why am I seeing these on a random basis? At a scene that had some inserted frames, after simply rewinding and re-playing, it seems to be fine.

sanlyn 05-22-2017 03:28 PM

You should be rewinding anyway to tighten the windings in the feed reel for smoother feed across the video heads. That's been a stable trick for years. I'd also advise that you try some recommended settings from the settings guide to prevent certain problems mentioned in the section on timing options. Since you're suing a USB device, settings for a/v sync were also mentioned.

Since you think the AVT might be inserting frames (not likely), try what you suggested and leave it out of the circuit. If you do that but leave Virtualdub defaults enabled, you'll get inserted and/or dropped frames anyway more than likely because you're accepting what Virtualdub thinks is "perfect" a/v timing. What will give you perfect frame and field timing within accepted limits is a properly working tbc, not Virtualdub itself.

jt_retro 05-22-2017 04:51 PM

Sorry, perhaps I wasn't very clear in what I'm trying to say.

I don't think the AVT is inserting frames. By "seeing inserted frames", what I mean is that the inserted frames counter is increasing in VirtualDub, which leads to jumpy video at that moment when the counter increased.

What I am suspicious of, is that my AVT is faulty and causing a badly timed output sporadically, causing Virtualdub to insert frames. Why I am suspicious that it's the AVT (or something not tape related), is that I can't reproduce it by rewinding the tape a few seconds to try it again.

I'm assuming (and I could be wrong here) that with the inserted frames feature enabled in Virtualdub, this is an indicator of the quality of the signal coming from the AVT? If so, what are acceptable limits here?

What are the recommended settings for a USB device? I only see reference to your internal cards.

Thanks

sanlyn 05-22-2017 07:13 PM

As the documentation states in the link furnished, If you enable frame insertion or dropping frames to maintain a/v sync in VirtualDub, then inserted or dropped frames are an indication of what Virtualdub thinks of your incoming signal in terms of its own pre-set timing preferences, and not an indication of the absolute timing of the TBC's output. This information is contained in VirtualDub's own online capture help. If you don't want to disable the features that adjust frame rate by inserting extra frames or dropping them, and don't want to to try disconnecting your AVT, then I suppose you'll just have to keep guessing.

The setting differences for most USB devices are the audio re-sync features, which should be turned off. Most USB devices maintain their own audio sync. The two settings recommended specifically for USB audio sync are shwon in the image of the timing options dialog in the previous post:
- In the "resync mode" section, enable "Do not resync between audio and video streams"
- Below that section, disable the "correct video timing..." entry, and enable "Automatically disable resync when integrated audio/video capure is detected"

lordsmurf 05-23-2017 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49478)
I don't think the AVT is inserting frames. By "seeing inserted frames", what I mean is that the inserted frames counter is increasing in VirtualDub, which leads to jumpy video at that moment when the counter increased.
What I am suspicious of, is that my AVT is faulty and causing a badly timed output sporadically, causing Virtualdub to insert frames. Why I am suspicious that it's the AVT (or something not tape related), is that I can't reproduce it by rewinding the tape a few seconds to try it again.
I'm assuming (and I could be wrong here) that with the inserted frames feature enabled in Virtualdub, this is an indicator of the quality of the signal coming from the AVT? If so, what are acceptable limits here?

This is all correct. :congrats:

It's a simple matter of plastic color. Is the AVT-8710 green or black?
Green = good
Black = problems

See also: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vcr-...-8710-doa.html

sanlyn 05-23-2017 07:05 AM

Comparing results with the AVT in and out of circuit is one way of checking for different effects. But considering the other problems, such as overheating, I'd say that his particular sample is a dud. If you can't find a good working sample, you can always try the pass-thru workaround with recommended devices -- not a perfect solution, but better than nothing and certainly better than a defective unit.

jt_retro 05-24-2017 05:13 AM

So, I removed the TBC.

To be clear, when I was using the TBC, in Virtualdub, I had the following:
Drop/Insert frames enabled
Sync audio to video by resampling the audio to a faster or slower rate enabled

When I removed the TBC, I also disabled Drop/Insert frames and also the Sync audio option. So I admit, this wasn't a fair test.

But, the audio is terribly out of sync by about 1-2 seconds. This only seems to happy on long video clips, but what's weird, is that it affects the footage at the start too. It seems that taking short captures is fine, even for the same footage at the start.

Am I going crazy, or is this expected without a TBC?

Is the tl'dr that without a TBC and/or letting virtual dub insert frames or resample the audio/video, there is no way to get an in-sync capture?

What is the theory here on why this is the case? Is it because that audio is always recorded (even "blank audio") whereas a choppy tape will not produce detectable frames by the catpure device, thus no video recorded - hence, the audio track is longer than the video track. Is that correct? If this is correct, I'm not sure this accounts for the footage at the start being out of sync also during long catpures.

LS - Do you have any of the green TBCs for sale? These black AVT devices are all I can seem to find here

Thanks

lordsmurf 05-24-2017 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49491)
When I removed the TBC, I also disabled Drop/Insert frames and also the Sync audio option. So I admit, this wasn't a fair test.

Yes, bad procedure, you introduced triple variables. ;)

Quote:

But, the audio is terribly out of sync by about 1-2 seconds.
Am I going crazy, or is this expected without a TBC?
It is. Lack of TBC causes many issues. Among them are dropped frames. Dropped frames are usually what create audio skewing. So what you're seeing is expected.

Quote:

letting virtual dub insert frames or resample the audio/video
Just to be clear, audio is not stored in sync with video. There is always natural variances. VirtualDub always changes the kHz by tiny amounts to maintain sync. Other hardware and software usually does too, but just hides this fact from you. VirtualDub is transparent about many aspect of capture.

Quote:

there is no way to get an in-sync capture?
No, that's not correct.
Yes, you can get perfectly in-sync captures, I've done it for 15+ years now. :)

Quote:

What is the theory here on why this is the case? <snip>
Is that correct?
As per my replies above, no, not correct. :no2:

Quote:

LS - Do you have any of the green TBCs for sale? These black AVT devices are all I can seem to find here
I have several DataVideos available, which can be better anyway. PM me.

jt_retro 05-24-2017 07:13 AM

Ok, then why does a non-TBC capture cause audio sync issues? I'm not aware of the theory here. I just assumed that a TBC would keep the frame rate constant, so that audio+video are close to being at the same rate (thus the same "length" as each other in the final output). My understanding, is that dropped frames implies shorter video length, with audio still being recorded, thus sync issues, no?

Also, how do you get an in-sync capture without using a TBC? That was my question :) Is it simply just enabling Virtualdub's audio sync features so that it changes the pitch?

Thanks

sanlyn 05-24-2017 02:34 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49495)
Ok, then why does a non-TBC capture cause audio sync issues?

It doesn't always cause sync issues, but often does.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49495)
I'm not aware of the theory here. I just assumed that a TBC would keep the frame rate constant, so that audio+video are close to being at the same rate (thus the same "length" as each other in the final output).

That's true -- if the tbc is working the way it's supposed to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49495)
My understanding, is that dropped frames implies shorter video length, with audio still being recorded, thus sync issues, no?

No. If the incoming frame rate is too fast to maintain the desired frame rate, dropped frames restore the correct playing time.This might cause audio sync issues, or might not. The audio may or may not be complying. It depends on how you've set up your timing options. In your case, your USB capture device is maintaining the correct audio rate, unless you direct VirtualDub to take over that function. That's why different timing options are set up for most USB devices than for other types of devices.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49495)
Also, how do you get an in-sync capture without using a TBC? That was my question :) Is it simply just enabling Virtualdub's audio sync features so that it changes the pitch?

You shouldn't enable VDub's audio sync features if you're using that Live-2 USB device.

Without an external tbc or pass-thru device, you're taking a chance on wildly fluctuation frame rates, and thus possible loss of audio sync if audio timing doesn't match. The AVT doesn't maintain audio timing, it just maintains video timing (that is, if it's working correctly!). If tbc timing is off, and you direct VDub to insert or drop frames to maintain a close tolerance to the desired frame rate, you'll get dropped or inserted frames if the tbc is acting up.

This is the timing option setup I've used for my Diamond VC500 USB captures, in XP and Win7, with the AVT or a pass-thru device in circuit for frame sync and audio monitoring turned off elsewhere:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1495654821

jt_retro 05-24-2017 03:32 PM

Thanks for your reply.

Those were the settings I used (without a TBC, albeit) and got very bad timing. I don't think my Live2 is maintaining audio+video sync.

I misspoke with what I said above regarding dropped frame. Let me ask my question again correctly:

My understanding, is that dropped frames from the Live2 (e.g. due to bad tape), with the inserted frames setting in Virtualdub disabled, implies shorter video length, with audio still being recorded at the wall-clock length, thus sync issues (audio is longer than video). Is that correct?

sanlyn 05-24-2017 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49499)
Those were the settings I used (without a TBC, albeit) and got very bad timing.

No surprise, if your tape player timing is fluctuating wildly enough.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49499)
I don't think my Live2 is maintaining audio+video sync.

Most USB devices cointrol audiop timing, not a/v sync. There is no frame tbc in the Live-2.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49499)
My understanding, is that dropped frames from the Live2 (e.g. due to bad tape), with the inserted frames setting in Virtualdub disabled, implies shorter video length, with audio still being recorded at the wall-clock length, thus sync issues (audio is longer than video). Is that correct?

Now the point has gone from the AVT dropping frames to the Live-2 dropping frames. At this point you're working with what seems to be a dud TBC, which likely is the source of most of these problems. Frames are dropped or inserted (if the features are turned on) to correct frame timing. That would maintain a 29.97 or 25 fps frame rate. In itself that won't correct audio timing. You can't adjust frame timing with the Live-2.

It's also possible that your player's timing is off, which is what a tbc is supposed to correct -- that is, if the tbc works and is powerful enough. With the gear I've used for 15 years I never had a/v sync problems and never had to insert or drop frames, and I've watched an awful lot of captures in scrupulous, repetitious detail during years of restoration procedures from both good and bad tapes. The only time I had a/v sync problems was some years ago when I started a capture with the F5 key instead of F6.

Something in your capture chain is misbehaving. Have you considered something like an ES10 or ES15 for pass-thru and not use the dud AVT at all? Many people do it successfully (including myself). My practice with the ES10/ES15 is to connect both audio and video through the the unit and let the pass-thru manage both.

You could also have operating system inteference, which is equally possible. Two other popular capture software possibilities are VirtualVCR and AmarecTV.

lordsmurf 05-24-2017 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sanlyn (Post 49500)
Have you considered something like an ES10 or ES15

I don't think that will help in this specific situation.

Remember that the ES10/15 is not a 100% true TBC, and dropped frames issues almost always need an external frame sync TBC (DataVideo, Cypress/AVT, Kramer, etc). The ES10/15 can still drop frames. Source can have issues, and capture hardware can be touchy, making it a bad fit. In those cases, you have to run the ES10 into an external TBC still.

sanlyn 05-24-2017 06:01 PM

I strongly disagree. I'll bet a working Es1o against a dud AVT-8710 any time. Or the O.P. needs a better external tbc that actually works without placing it on a bag of ice cubes to prevent over-heating.

jt_retro 05-24-2017 06:06 PM

Quote:

Now the point has gone from the AVT dropping frames to the Live-2 dropping frames.
Actually i don't mean to comment so specifically. I just mean missing frames going in to the computer.

I'm just trying to understand why audio goes out of sync when there are frames coming in too slow/too fast, and no correction in Virtualdub. I'm trying to conceptualise that when no correction is enabled in Virtualdub (i.e. Virtualdub will do not inserting or dropping frames), the video goes out of sync with the audio as the "lengths" of the video and audio are different.

One things that is really interesting, is that it's still better with my dud AVT, than no AVT at all. We're talking hundreds of dropped frames vs maybe 20 over an hour.

Still though, I'd like to see none, and the locking up of the AVT during recording transitions/really bad parts of the tape is unacceptable - right? Or am I being too harsh on a £200 device?

sanlyn 05-24-2017 09:42 PM

Locking up? Hundreds of dropped frames? Are you playing a tape, or gift wrap ribbon? That's a literally destroyed cassette, or your player simply can't track it, or only a shop grade tbc would have the power to keep things straight (Be prepared to spend 20 times what you spent on the AVT, or more). I've had some pretty bad tapes myself, and some that mistracked even in my AG-1980 (but no dropped frames, btw). I'm even starting to suspect PC-based difficulties (I capture with the internet disconnected and anti-virus turned off). Seriously, that's very poor performance. At that rate I'd be looking to replace everything in sight, including the player, the capture card, and the PC itself. So I definitely appreciate your distress.

Other than the suggestions already made, including using other software beyond VDub, I can only wonder at all this. Legions of users worldwide have no problem with VirtualDub capture, yet occasional mysteries keep popping up. I can only conclude that something in a specific setup just doesn't mate properly, and that "something" never seems to get resolved except by changing some major factor in the total capture setup.

lordsmurf 05-24-2017 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt_retro (Post 49503)
I'm just trying to understand why audio goes out of sync

There are several ways it can happen, but the most common at capture time is loss of frames. Video drops/inserts, audio does not. It's that easy. You end up with more audio runtime than video.

Quote:

One things that is really interesting, is that it's still better with my dud AVT, than no AVT at all.
Classic sign of bad TBC. Without will guaranteed drop. With a bad unit will still drop and have other problems (freezing frames, repeat frames, offset frames, etc).

Quote:

We're talking hundreds of dropped frames vs maybe 20 over an hour.
Correct. That's what will happen.

Quote:

Or am I being too harsh on a £200 device?
It would be a deserved complaint if it was a £2 device. It promises something that does not work. Once upon a time, when the unit was green, it was fine. Some earlier black units were also fine. Then chipsets changed around 2010/2011, and it was a waste of money. I tested new 2015/2016 units earlier this year, and they still suck.

Just FYI, given your problem reports, I've been able to entirely eliminated or mostly eliminate other potential problems. Faulty TBC is extremely likely your issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sanlyn (Post 49509)
Hundreds of dropped frames?
That's a literally destroyed cassette, or your player simply can't track it,

Nope. TBC can cause this easy.

Quote:

or only a shop grade tbc
Nope. Broadcast-grade TBCs would do worse, not better. Those expect better master/1st-gen sources, like BetacamSP, U-matic and S-VHS. Home sources like VHS tend to confuse them entirely. I have ample samples of how "pro" TBCs compare to the ones suggested on this site. I've just not had time to post it.

Quote:

I'm even starting to suspect PC-based difficulties
That prospect is eliminated for now because of how the with-TBC vs. without-TBC behaves, and given that the TBC he's using is a known-flawed unit. The correct course of action is to get a known-good TBC. Only then, if the problem persists, can other troubleshooting begin. And I'm betting it won't get that far. I've seen this exact issue. I still have a bad 2015 AVToolbox TBC right here, for testing.

Quote:

At that rate I'd be looking to replace everything
including the player, the capture card, and the PC itself.
Not yet.

Quote:

Other than the suggestions already made, including using other software beyond VDub,
I never suggest this. It just gets worse with others.

jt_retro 05-25-2017 02:56 AM

There is nothing wrong with my VCR, or even the tape for that matter. The visible output of the tape and VCR is of an extremely high quality. The "hundreds" of dropped frames (where Virtualdub inserts frames) occurs during recording transitions (or a few seconds of very bad tracking due to the camcorder is was made with), when tracking is off etc.

There is also nothing wrong with the PC. It's a vanilla install of Windows 10 on a Core i7 laptop :)

As for the capture card, it's probably fine, given the improved performance with the TBC, albeit not perfect, due to the TBC most likely being faulty. The locking up I refer to is the TBC locking up during the bad tracking.

All in all, everything is working well, except for the TBC locking up during bad transitions, and also giving badly timed output at random points (causing about 20 dropped frames every hour or so).

Quote:

You end up with more audio runtime than video.
Thank you LS, that's the answer I was looking for as to why audio goes out of sync due to bad video timing, and it makes sense to me :)

FWIW, my VCR has a built in TBC as well which I've been using all along. It's a Panasonic 930 SVHS machine. I'm really impressed by it as you can visibly see the "wobble" being fixed :)

It's like the built in TBC fixes the wobble, and the AVT (when working!) keeps the frame rate constant and fixes any remaining tape judder, especially at the top.

lordsmurf 05-25-2017 03:26 AM

- What is the card?
- Windows 10 is not advised, as it does stuff in the background, like a kid with ADD. Terrible OS for video. It for sure should not be allowed to connect to the internet.

However, the TBC is probably still likely.

Your issue is not "timing". That's a reserved jargon for something else. Your issue is dropped frames, liekly caused by the known-faulty TBC. which also leads to audio skew.

"Wobble" is "horizontal jitter". It's an image issue, and is indeed fixed internal line TBCs in a VCR. However, said VCR does nothing for dropped frames and signal integrity, which is what the external frame sync TBC is for.

"Judder" is also a reserved jargon, and almost always is used for IVTC/TC situations. VHS should never have this. I'm betting you observations are falsely observed as judder, but in reality you're seeing visual dropped frames. The net effect is similar, but with judder being correctable, and NOT causing sync issues.

msgohan 05-25-2017 09:06 AM

I would capture a stable source (DVD player, TV box) with audio to make sure you can do that without the 20 random drops per hour.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 PM

Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.