![]() |
Hybrid (Avisynth) resize methods, fast vs. faster?
I want to know which interpolation is best used when resizing DVD video to 540p. Lanczos? Spline64?
|
It fully depend on content.
You can put most things into 3 buckets: - bad - not bad, but not great (passable) - good, excellent Right now, you're discussing things in that last/best bucket. At this stage, it starts to be nuanced, situation based, even preference. |
The source material I'm converting is good quality. Mainstream DVDs. What's the best method for that situation? Also I want to know what QTGMC preset I should use for deinterlacing. Should I use Faster or Fast? I'm kinda torn between the two.
|
For this decision, I'd suggest learning more about QTGMC.
QTGMC is not "a filter", but more like a controller for multiple filters being called up. Which filter is called, and those settings, determines quality. You can manually enable via switches, or you can choose presets. Look at the actual script: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/re...0up/QTGMC.avsi In particular, this part: Code:
# Very Very Super Ultrahttp://avisynth.nl/index.php/QTGMC There's really not much different between "fast" and "faster" presets, mostly some housekeeping to the motion search refinement, and increased radius to TR0. BTW, you can call up a preset, then add switches/syntax to alter or add the variable. So, for example, you could call up "faster" and then chase it with a TR0=2 to match the slower "fast" preset, and leave other fast vs. faster changes alone. Does this all make sense? Given your source, faster is probably fine. It's what I'd normally do in this situation. |
It's beggining to make more sense to me. This deinterlacer is complicated. I noticed that Lanczos leave a larger file than bilinear. Does it mean more detail retention?
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.