SansGrip,
Finished "The Green Mile". The predicted file size was 595,860KB and the final size is 578,176KB. So 595,860 * 0.98 = 583,942.8 which is very close to the final size. -kwag |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
If telecide/decimate is always safe to use, one less thing I have to remember when using dvd2avi :) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
SansGrip,
Since you are master of the filters, I'm curious on your opinions on filter usage when going from SVCD -> KVCD. Your Signs sample looks excellent, but I'm curious if such smoothing would help or hinder on a source that has already been processed. Even without TemporalSoften()/Cnr2() in the equation... is Blockbuster noise still appropriate (var=.3)? FluxSmooth()? Anything else not normally needed with DVD->KVCD processing? I know, I know, I need to go do some testing myself. Lack of time plus slow CPU makes that a long process. Much quicker to hit 'Refresh' on this thread ;) |
Quote:
|
Sansgrip Wrote :
Quote:
No, seriously, i tried the sound in 64, 80, 96, 112, in the kvcd LBR, when kwag put it on the oven by the first time. I totally agree with you, 112 it's just like 128, i do my VCD-MP3 with 112, so it can fit more music on a 80 min CD. I've just used 128 cos i was wondering if the DTX from episode 2 DVD would get better somehow, but it didn't. I think you'll find that the audio sounds just fine at 112kbps if you resample to 44.1khz (there are noticible artifacts at that bitrate if you leave it at 48khz). That gives you a bit more room for video. I recommend using HeadAC3he for audio encoding. Quote: Also i'll see if Gripfit can do something about this pioneer issue, so, will encode and cross my fingers. Quote:
M0rdant wrote Quote:
Well, back to work. See ya Pacodoni 8) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Signs
Desired size: 723,540,206 Actual size: 711,133,314 Difference: 1.74% Factor: 1.0 Hmmm. |
motion search precision
How big of a difference is there between normal and high quality? |
Quote:
That's closer to actual. Maybe the .98 is a better "average" factor? -kwag |
Hi SansGrip,
The sample you posted, did you use "High quality" or "estimated motion search" or "Normal". Does it really make such a big difference in quality between "High quality" and "estimated motion search", high quality takes so long! |
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have found this also help with audio if I burn as svcd I can use min 300 otherwise I need to use min 750 (Pioneer dv344), I have however noticed a sort of shimmering in some scenes when I use this method that does not exist if I burn as vcd, have you experienced the same? |
Yep I just did a 90 min movie with normal and high quality with the same CQ settings and normal ended up being over 10 megs larger. I'm sure the difference will vary per movie...
How about highest quality? anyone willing to wait that long? Does it save even more space? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
I'd still like to know what algorithm it's using for "motion estimate", whether it's PMVFAST or another tried-and-tested algorithm or some home-grown version. |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.