Quote:
Of course "Anamorphic" DVD are anamorphic (so source_anamorphic=true). As I said previously in the thread : Quote:
|
Ok, thanks.
-Maurus |
Let's go again! :D
I need to know when to set 16:9 or 4:3 or what else (please do an extended answer) in TMPGEncoder, HC Encoder, NuEnc, QuEnc, CCE, and in general in any encoder that supports this option. i.e.: NuEnc have option checks for 16:9, 4:3, 2:21 and 1:1, HC Encoder 16:9, 4:3 and don't know if any more. I encoded 2 movies in 16:9 but dvd2avi show sources as 4:3. I play they in BSPlayer and, when select 16:9 they are not proportioned, but yes when select 4:3. Avicodec info 4:3 as 16:9 and 16:9 as 2:21. So I don't understand nothing. Can anybody here make me understand it from here and for ever. :lol: Thank you very much. BTW: Can I keep those encoded files or I must to reencode it again? |
You set 16:9 if you want something anamorphic. And that is for source from 1.77 to 2.35.
For the same sources you set 4:3 is you want them letterboxed. Note1: even in anamorphic all these sources will have borders; but smaller than if 4:3 is choosed. Note2: anamorphic is allowed only in MPEG2 and in res upper to 352*480(576) Note3: forget about 2.21 that all encoder propose because THIS IS NOT SUPPORTED BY ANY STANDALONE ! Note4: selecting "16:9" or "4:3" in the encoder does not change ANYTHING to the A/R of the picture that is inside the box. And for the last time remember that all these fucking stupid encoders are using 16:9 to say anamorphic AND all anamorphic streams ARE 4:3 (I say that differently ? Ok : when you select 16:9 in any encoder you want, it produces something that is 4:3. Funny isn't it ? I say funny because when I call that stupid, it seems to hurt some eyes) Trust me, there is really nothing hard to understand. All is in the part in big letters above. The day all this developpers will call things their real name (I mean anamorphic and not 16:9) we will stop to have this kind of sentence : Quote:
when you say : Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/i...2005/07/10.png I encoded it with anamorphic flag (16:9). Source is not anamorphic. avs line is GripCrop(704, 576, overscan=2, source_anamorphic=false) Is it ok? |
Quote:
Note: with this mistake you can see that the word "16:9" put on the box (the stream) does not tell anything about what is inside the box (the movie itself). That's why is should be so much better to use "anamorphic" and "flat" (the official cinematographic words, where all this came from I remind you) in the encoders insteed of "16:9" and "4:3". |
Sure, I agree.
Can I keep my work or I need to reencode it? |
Quote:
I hope in future versions maybe the developers can use the proper name but I wouldn't hold my breath. :lol: |
Quote:
|
Can I to encode a source no anamorphic as anamorphic with a good result?
|
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.