Quote:
No problem with discussions based on samples visually compared like just above concerning therora/x264. |
Quote:
All people has right to give its opinion, while that doesn't be an ofense. If you don't want such discussions, simply, don't answer (neither read) those topics. |
Quote:
And we already have concrete conclussion, that avcodec is a piece of trash, as far as compliancy. I may very well be the best encoder, as far as "quality" produced on low bitrates compared to other commercial MPEG-1/2 encoders, but it's useless for SAP and other applications because compliancy issues. -kwag |
Quote:
I already told that not reading something is not like not having them be written. I won't associate my "image" to such ********* that's all. Everything has been said about stupidity of metrics, and no word needs to be added. Metrics can be easily fooled (for instance, all TV broadcasters will tell you the volume of adds is not louder than the remainder of the programms - and the metrics show they are right -, but everyone jumps on his remote to lower the volume as soon as advertising start). If people want to be stupid, they can be such elsewhere (doom9 for instance). There I won't read them or if I do, I won't be upsetted if they write something I don't want to be associated with. |
1) Speak about metric with video codec dev and not with me. They can speak about capacity and limit of metric very better than me (or you). For example Metric can detect easyest that H264 will be visually very better than Ogg Theora in previous post (useless for me to see the encoding ... I see difference for OPSNR ... but it's certainely only a coincidence ... lol). But it's not the subject here : quality can be for me pure subjective visual quality too ... :twisted:
2) MPEG2 challenge could be: - Visual quality between q6 and q8 encoding (low bitrate like KDVD profil) - Target bitrate for encoder - DVD Compliance Verification Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think that Zhou Wang, Ligang Lu and Alan C. Bovik are not stupid people too http://www.cns.nyu.edu/~zwang/files/papers/vssim.pdf Syskin, Skal (XviD Dev), Bobololo, Babayaga, Manao (Nero dev), pengvado (x264 dev), karl_lillevold (RV10 dev), One2Tech (VPX dev), sh0dan (AviSynth Developer), hank315 (HC encoder) ... and more and more ... are stupid people ... ??? |
Excuse me you are right. They are not stupids. Go continue read them. Elsewhere. Far. Thanks.
|
Quote:
Noone said that! Its clear that H264 based ones at the moment are the hottest codecs around, no doubt at all. And you showed some people in here the "visual" quality via samples where those people had'nt make their experiences on THAT codec till now as they made their encodings using mpeg2 for DVD SAP purposes. Now again you took your 1928374746th attempt to say that Mencoder or libavcodec in general for mpeg2 is the "best" (a word you like in general) which resulted in a 193736347th "Please not again" from here. That sadly forced you to mix up the subject by saying that we could take great developers for fools (see your quote above). THAT "statement" where you do count names had no! relation to the words being said in here about the mpeg2 compilancy-capabilities in total of libavodec! BTW: At any serious board I know, the words "whats the best" and also "being the best" are not accepted at all. |
Quote:
1) Visual quality between q6 and q8 encoding (low bitrate like KDVD profil) 2) Target bitrate for encoder 3) DVD Compliance Verification I have a very good source for test that (extra high quality source, extra low compressibility, extra high difficulty for RC, extra high difficulty for VBV ... etc etc etc) |
|
Quote:
I not speak about metric for next challenge: 1) Visual quality between q6 and q8 encoding (low bitrate like KDVD profil) 2) Target bitrate for encoder 3) DVD Compliance Verification |
Quote:
-kwag |
Well I don't speak about only Libavcodec : if LAVC MPEG2 don't produce compliant stream ... we not include LAVC stream in Challenge. There are other MPEG2 encoder like CCE, ProCoder, Mainconcept, HCEnc ... etc etc etc
Challenge will be open only for MPEG2 encoder with certified compliant stream. But little question : how do you check MPEG2 DVD compliant stream ... ??? |
I remember I did intensive testing with mencoder a year and a half ago. I had problems with bitrate spikes when encoding for KDVD (with maxbitrate 5000 I got spikes around 11000, that my SAP didn't play).
I tried every moded version I came across, but still the same. Even those streams that didn't show spikes, also didn't play well. I kept testing it even after mencoder forum went on hold. But finally I dropped it. I want my KDVD to be played in my SAP, and if possible, with the garantee they'll be playable in my future SAP. So mencoder wasn't useful for my purpose. I don't mind to test anything claimed to be good, to improve further my encodings. But I want to play them later on a SAP, not just my PC. If not, I just find it a toy, but not a tool for backing up my DVDs. Well, just my opinion. If nothing changed in mencoder (or lavc) related to MPEG2 or ratecontrol, if mencoder keeps noncompliant, I don't see the point to test it again. Just to play again, not serious encoding. (I don't mind to play, I enjoyed it a lot when playing with command-line and so... but keeping in mind it won't be useful to be played on SAP). Again, just a personal opinion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
10 people on one hand that knows about mencoder, you on the other hand with this "No need to discuss with me... I'm always right" signature. Grow up (anyone) BTW, this toppic is not the one of the current thread. |
Quote:
and I repeat my question : you say encoder X or encoder Y don't produce MPEG2 DVD compliant stream but how do you check MPEG2 DVD compliant stream ... ??? |
Quote:
-kwag |
yes ... not really practical and easy for quick check ... :wink:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.