digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)
-   -   KVCD: KVCDx2 vs KVCD x3 (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/2018-kvcd-kvcdx2-vs.html)

Reno 01-03-2003 01:49 AM

KVCDx2 vs KVCD x3
 
I have really good results with the x2 704x480 template, but I have seen several comments that the x3 template is just as good (or better) when viewed on the TV. My question is this: why would a reduced resolution produce identical results? When I viewed samples from both templates on my monitor, the x2 output looked better.

I haven't put any XVCD's together with x3, but I will be more than willing to give it, a try (with the proper convincing).

So, convince me! Is the advantage to be found in a shorter encoding time, reduced block noise, smaller file size, what's the appeal?

Thanks in advance for this; I'm still a hopeless Noob :lol:

SansGrip 01-03-2003 09:43 AM

Re: KVCDx2 vs KVCD x3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reno
So, convince me!

Less mosquito noise, fewer macroblocks, less overall blockiness, shorter encoding time, higher CQ/CQ_VBR level, longer playing time.

:)

Reno 01-03-2003 04:09 PM

Holy smokes!! :oops:

Yep, that did it. All further projects will be x3.

Thanks, Sansgrip!!

Gaudi 01-03-2003 06:40 PM

Mine too. Have just finished Spiderman. Over two hours, almost fullscreen and the quality is very acceptable.

(eventhou the final quality was 7.77)

Very nice job the gurus in here!!!


Keep on going.


Gaudi

Reno 01-03-2003 11:28 PM

I can now testify that I was a complete fool using the x2 template. The quality on 'Super Troopers' is nothing short of gorgeous!! Granted, since I am still mostly a complete fool, I chose to activate Tempgenc's color-correct AND noise reduction filters, and I am now looking at a 25-hour encoding time for a 98 min movie... :D

I can be VERY patient when it comes to better results....

Thanks to Sansgrip and Kwag, and all the rest of you merciless, unstoppable video gods!! :twisted:

SansGrip 01-03-2003 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reno
I chose to activate Tempgenc's color-correct AND noise reduction filters

Colour-correction and noise reduction can both be done as easily and more effectively through a variety of Avisynth filters. Personally I like FluxSmooth. Did I mention that already? :mrgreen:

SansGrip 01-03-2003 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reno
Thanks to Sansgrip and Kwag, and all the rest of you merciless, unstoppable video gods!! :twisted:

Btw, you should probably put kwag's name (and the names of others) before mine. Just take a look at the date I joined the forum... ;)

kwag 01-04-2003 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SansGrip
Btw, you should probably put kwag's name (and the names of others) before mine. Just take a look at the date I joined the forum... ;)

No way SansGrip :D . I started a little snowball and you and many others have made it into a huge avalanche :flip:

-kwag

Reno 01-04-2003 12:19 AM

Very well....

ALL HAIL THE GRAND HIGH POOBAH OF VIDEO - KWAG! KWAG! KWAG!

Prostrate yourselves before the man who started it all!!!

Seriously, Kwag, you are a life saver!! I am so happy I found out about you and your disciples....

TWO! FOUR! SIX! EIGHT! WHO DO WE APPRECIATE!? KWAG!!!! KWAG!!!! KWAAAAAAAAG!!!! :lol:

SansGrip 01-04-2003 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
No way SansGrip :D . I started a little snowball

I just got a 2h20m movie on one disc at 528x480 with very good quality. I wouldn't call that a little snowball :mrgreen:.

Reno 01-04-2003 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SansGrip
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reno
I chose to activate Tempgenc's color-correct AND noise reduction filters

Colour-correction and noise reduction can both be done as easily and more effectively through a variety of Avisynth filters. Personally I like FluxSmooth. Did I mention that already? :mrgreen:

I know, I know....

But I am loath to learn an all new program just yet. If you can steer me in the direction of a good thread based on this technology, I'd be grateful.

Did I mention I was a complete idiot? :D

SansGrip 01-04-2003 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reno
But I am loath to learn an all new program just yet.

Once you get used to it Avisynth is so easy you'll be amazed you ever felt intimidated. Go here and download 2.07 and install it as per the instructions, then read some of The Giant Threads(tm) for good scripts to use.

If you need help, and it's about Avisynth in general, shout in the Avisynth forum. If it's about one of my filters specifically (Blockbuster, FluxSmooth, Sampler, etc.) shout in SansGrip's Filters forum and I'll see what I can do.

Quote:

Did I mention I was a complete idiot? :D
You did, but I don't believe it :).

Reno 01-04-2003 01:05 AM

All right, SansGrip, I downloaded the scary new software addition to my desktop, per your instructions. I have no doubt that you are right in recommending this, but I fear you've overestimated my end-user skills :D

I'll work at it, and I hope to deliver good news soon...

Reno 01-04-2003 01:14 AM

SansGrip,

BTW, thanks for offering your help. Hope I don't need it (I probably will LOL), but nice to know it's there....

KingTuk 01-08-2003 11:57 PM

CQ setting
 
on the KVCD X3...

What is the lowest CQ setting you would goto before you split it up on more CD's?

I've used 11 for my lowest and it looks great on a normal 32" Television.

kwag 01-09-2003 12:30 AM

Hi KingTuk,

The best thing to do is to look at your encoded prediction sample. If it looks good for one CD, leave it. If not, then go for 2 CDs :D

-kwag

Reno 01-09-2003 01:47 AM

I'm encoding K-19 right now, at 15 (lowest I've had it). I may have to run it through again, It's almost done and the file size (video only) is Over 700 megs. Hopefully I can add the audio and keep it small enough to burn!

I'll keep that 11 minimum in mind if it comes to that!

SansGrip 01-09-2003 08:19 AM

Re: CQ setting
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KingTuk
What is the lowest CQ setting you would goto before you split it up on more CD's?

I've never had to go to more discs. I usually just drop the resolution. But if you don't want to do that, I'd say base your decision on how the sample looks, not what the number is. If you see too many artifacts then go to two discs.

The only way of knowing what is "too many" is to encode lots and lots of samples at different quality levels, then play them on your TV. You'll soon pick up a feeling for what is acceptable and what isn't.

Quote:

I've used 11 for my lowest and it looks great on a normal 32" Television.
I assume you mean CQ_VBR. I've gone as low as 8-9, but that's pushing it. I'd rather stay in the teens.

Yoda 01-09-2003 09:37 AM

@Reno
I encoded K19 with the latest 704x480 template using clip borders in Tmpgenc. Here's the template.

LoadPlugin("D:\Downloads\FitCD\MPEG2DEC.dll")
LoadPlugin("d:\downloads\fluxsmooth\fluxsmooth.dll ")
LoadPlugin("d:\downloads\sampler\sampler.dll")
LoadPlugin("d:\downloads\legalclip\legalclip.dll")
mpeg2source("D:\Movies\Vob\K19\K19.d2v")
LegalClip()
BilinearResize(672,352,0,0,720,480)
FluxSmooth()
AddBorders(16,64,16,64)
LegalClip()

Got it on 1 disk with excellent quality.

-Yoda

Reno 01-09-2003 03:19 PM

Mucho thanks Yoda!!

I'll try that out.

Oh, one more (really dumb noob) question; you appear to have loaded some of Sansgrip's filters in Tempgenc. I thought those where written for Avisynth! They're supported? Argghh...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.