Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Jokes aside, I tried to contact you about a year ago, but IIRC you were not answering posts then. Quote:
And GPL does no provisions as to which reasons can I have to ask for the sources. I can even use them to develop a proprietary program that I’d never release. Although this is not in the spirit of GPL, it is perfectly allowed. And that’s probably one good reason why people like kwag don’t like GPL. But then, don’t use it. There may be better choices. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Slowly I came back to the forum and saw that many people were complaining about MovieStacker not been compatible with AviSynth2.5. I saw that MovieStacker was causing problems instead of helping, and that’s why I decided (and now I regret) to update MovieStacker. Quote:
Look r6d2, of course this is the fundamental difference we seem to have, and I think we are getting too repetitive here. I see no reason to continue with that as we will not get anywhere with it. At least 10 people have already told me this argument. I understand it and I already said that I accept it (even don't agreeing with it). That's why I removed MovieStacker from download. Quote:
|
Just two clarifications.
Quote:
Quote:
Now let's move on, we have some bugs to fix! :D |
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Just thought I should ask this, cos I've been wondering now for a while.
I'm one of the fortunate ones who downloaded MovieStacker 2.1 before it was withdrawn. My question is - where do I stand as to using it for my own use now that its unavailable and considering the ongoing dispute? I know that noone is gonna come knocking at my door demanding that I stop using it, but I just thought I'd ask from the point of view of shh and the licence thing. |
Hello fingerbob,
about your question, Quote:
If you have any problems or questions about the way it works, I'm sure the other guys in the forum and even muaddib himself will be more than happy to help you with anything. The license issue between muaddib and Shh is being solved, hence muaddib taking the program out of circulation for a while to solve that issue. Most of us in KVCD are just moving forward, to just keep helping the members that need it, as well as the other ongoing projects in KVCD. :wink: Our moderators are trying to lead people to move forward and forget all this commotion, that went on about the license, again we have other KVCD projects, the site is big and we are addressing other issues Ciao Glänzend |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.