![]() |
Opinions on Sony SLV-R1000 VCR?
I found a listing in the $500 range for a truly refurbished Sony SLV-R1000 by a highly rated seller. I'm not finding anything about the model in forum search. What's your experience?
|
I don't have an opinion on the unit, but if you're willing to spend that kind of money, I would strongly consider one of the approved VCR's from the VCR Buying Guide on this forum.
|
It's just not that good of a deck.
If you already have a quality with-TBC JVC, and a Panasonic AG-1980P as secondary, yet still feel the need to collect other-brand VCRs, then I say go for it. My recipe is: - 1st = JVC S-VHS with TBC, all-around best - 2nd = Panasonic AG-1980P, for EP, VHS-C, linear audio, etc -- noting JVC can be fine at EP/VHS-C/linear too - 3rd = another JVC S-VHS, but non-similar/different model - 4th = other high-end models, but mostly for fun/play more than serious use/work Jumping straight to a Sony like this would be a mistake, bad use of funds. Also don't trust eBay feedback. Negatives are quite easy to get removed, which most people do not realize. The system has been gamed for years. And anybody selling dozens/hundreds of "serviced" VCRs is full of crap. Don't fall for it. In the 2020s, it's not an easy task for one person to do more than 1-2 decks per week, if truly servicing everything. |
Thanks, that's the answer I was looking for!
|
Quote:
Most family/private VHS (large part of digitization projects)are recorded with linear sound, not Hi-Fi. I did not noticed difference between JVC HR-S7722/7711 and Panasonic NV-FS200. And test cassettes show about the same result (however I did not tested full audio spectrum, only basic 100hz 1000hz 10Khz). Where lie the problem of JVC? |
Quote:
Testing frequency response isnt enough. We have to test broadband noise performance in playback re the reference signal. This is a common test with solely audio tape gear, or should be. Quote:
These things can happen when people are recommended VCR's solely or mostly based on their picture playback, forgetting the equal importance of audio playback, especially linear/normal audio which as you say was commonly used on many valued recordings. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
-- merged -- If we compare the manufacturer specifications of the HR-S77xx and Panasonic NV-FS200, we see that Panasonic has specified only the parameters of Hi-Fi audio - dynamic range better than 90db, frequency range 20hz-20khz etc. JVC is more precise (or more honest?) - specifying SNR 45db (which does not go with Hi-Fi at all, and JVC's SNR is not 45 db at Hi-Fi of course, it is better) and Normal audio frequency range 70hz-10khz. I believe this worth a test. I have Panasonic linear audio test cassette 6khz/ 400hz-8khz-15khz. However not sure all frequencies are still up to specs. But at least it is possible to compare Panasonic & JVC. I am really curious :) Attachment 19851 |
Linear audio can be tweaked on JVC VCRs, I've done it. I was willing to tweak every tape if needed but when I adjusted it to the optimal position for few tapes it ended up staying that way as it didn't sound as bad as it used to be anymore, So I guess over time the head stack goes out of alignment due to fast forwarding and rewinding or it was never adjusted perfectly at the factory. Either way it plays all tapes satisfactorily now.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
We check it by adjusting it, which means misadjust it to sound worse, then rock it through the peak alignment point a few times then carefully narrow it down to the peak point, normally the sharpest, clearest sound. Just as we did when tuning video tracking for peak RF signal on older VCR's before auto tracking was introduced on later model VCR's. (Below picture of front panel tracking adjuster on old Betacord deck). To my knowledge, unfortunately automatic linear audio azimuth adjustment has never been offered on any VCR or VTR so I assume we have to adjust it manually on every deck. To explain a little more, unfortunately with video head tracking, the manufacturers could not tighten the tolerances enough, so they had to provide the consumer front panel manual Tracking Control. It's the same with linear audio azimuth especially at the very slow tape speeds. The production tolerances could not be made that tight. Hence the need to tweak azimuth. Again we cant be certain a deck's linear audio azimuth is peaked on a given unknown tape unless we adjust it for that peak. If on some tapes it turns out that the azimuth was correct before our adjusting, we now know that for certain. I suspect that if there was a manual linear audio azimuth adjuster knob on the front panel of every VCR, even better, on the VCR's remote, a whole lot more digitizing folk would be twiddling it, because it would be so safe and easy to twiddle it. Quote:
|
What I meant is JVC linear audio can be improved by adjustment as the factory position can't be relied on, Once adjusted to an optimal level on some pre-recorded tapes I found out that there is no need to do it again as most tapes exhibited an acceptable db level and noise floor compared to what it was before.
|
Quote:
I've said for for years. These decks are are all 20-30 years old now. Gravity takes a toll. I realign everything for that reason. It's time consuming. But once done, it tends to be done for years. Although, yes, FF/REW/PLAY can have some nuanced affects, forcing premature re-realignment. |
I'm not sure if static gravity can play any role here, the parts are way too light to have enough force to move the adjusting screws, If throwing the VCR from the 10th floor than yes gravity is devastating here. It's usually brutal force resulting from damaged tapes, mis alignment or broken parts that turn the electric motor force into self destructing force and also without forgetting the human force from abuse and misuse.
|
VCRs get misadjusted by mere millimeters. Gravity can definitely affect mm over decades.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There's this line in The Big Short, where Steve Carell (based on real-life Steve Eisman) puts his hand in the air, and says "0%" That's how I feel here. 0% chance it will be the same client to client. Does not happen. At best -- and this is what I do -- you can have multiple decks with multiple offset presets. That way, you're not tweaking endlessly inside a deck guts, you just swap out to another unit. Odds of a deck working immediately is vastly more than 0% now. |
Quote:
For tapes recorded on mis aligned VCRs, I have a VCR ready for tweaking but I rarely have to do that, As I said they all play crisp audio with good audio level and very low noise floor. and I'm not a super fanatic to readjust the audio head for every tape, that's insane, but I don't question people who do it, you can be fanatic about any hobby. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 19862 |
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
You did not also mention the other equally important variable here which is linear tape speed. The slower the tape speed, the less forgiving of azimuth error. Standard VHS SP tape speed is 1.313ips (NTSC) or 0.921ips (PAL). That's slower than the standard Compact Cassette (1.875ips) and of course it gets slower. LP halves those speeds and then even slower, SLP and EP. From Wiki: "... This speed is quite slow: for SP it is about 2/3s that of an audio cassette, and for EP it is slower than the slowest microcassette speed. This is widely considered inadequate for anything but basic voice playback, and was a major liability for VHS-C camcorders that encouraged the use of the EP speed."... Unfortunately the Wiki article makes no mention of the added problems of azimuth misalignment the slower the tape speed. A given misalignment at SP speed might just make speech and music a little dull and more hissy, but at LP it will be worse, and EP even worse still. Speech can become not only dull but barely intelligible, with even more background noise. This is the same set of problems encountered with audio magnetic tape well before Beta or VHS were invented. Nothing new here. That's why getting the best results out of economical consumer formats can be actually harder than the more expensive and robust pro formats. It takes more expertise! Getting good, consistent results can involve more than just buying "the best" gear, banging in a tape in and pressing play. Quote:
So I dont have to: 1. open up the VCR, 2. find the correct azimuth screw (there is only one correct azimuth screw in each machine), 3. locate the correct non magnetic screwdriver for that screw, 4. adjust azimuth with the machine open and nothing to steady the screwdriver but my own hopefully steady hand, careful not to accidentally touch or damage parts inside the VCR especially the delicate spinning video head drum or the moving tape, and avoid to electrocuting myself by touching exposed high voltage components. I dont have those problems or risks. There's just one external knob to adjust. In making a simple mod, I made it easier, quicker and safer, and at less than 30 seconds per tape, adjusting audio azimuth for each tape takes only a tiny fraction of the maximum playing time of the average tape, say 180 mins for SP and 360 minutes for LP. I'm not saying that everyone should or could make this sort of mod. Maybe most cant. I'm just showing it can be done by those with the skills and it makes adjusting azimuth a lot quicker easier and safer. Pictured a TOTL Nakamichi cassette deck with a front panel azimuth adjuster built in from the factory. Pictured also is a professional Studer tape machine used in the record production business. Note the professional azimuth adjuster knob and matching scale, acting on the play head azimuth. Most pro studio tape recordings are more forgiving for a given azimuth error than SP VHS yet still these pro's have the adjuster fitted. Also pro recorded tapes often have alignment tones recorded including for azimuth. This makes it easier. You could be stone deaf and still get the azimuth right just looking at meters rather than listening. No such luck with most amateur recordings. All we have is listening to whatever was recorded on the tape and align azimuth to that as best we can. (At least when using a mono track ACE head which is the most common). Another example where getting the best results from non pro audio recordings is actually harder. For here we have nothing but our listening skills to guide us. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not digitizing standard alignment/calibration tapes. They make rather boring listening and so far nobody has asked me to digitize one. Of course if I ever sold a machine I would first adjust azimuth to standard. Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.