VHS to DVD conversion: My way doesn't look very good!
Okay maybe Mr. Sinatra inspired me to try my VHS conversion my way instead listening to the advice posted on this forum. Or, maybe it was just me being stubborn. In any case I kept telling myself that the people on this forum just take things too far and most of the discussion is just hyperbole. Well, I guess the bottom line is I'm many hours into the process and I'm disappointed in the finished result of my VHS to DVD conversion. I'm hoping that if I eat a little crow I won't get lambasted too much.
This is what I did and what I used. I'm converting VHS home movies. I used a retail consumer Panasonic VCR (model PV-V4022-A), a Avermedia M116D capture card with Conexant CX23416-22 MPEG II Encoder and AVS4YOU capture software. The AVS4YOU software captured in MPEG II at 720 x 480 at 6,000 kbps. I then converted to DVD using AVS4YOU. Watched the DVD on Hitachi 42" Plasma TV. I don't think the finished product looks very good. What I would like to know if anyone would care to answer... What should my expectations be for a good finished product? I watched the original VHS tape after watching my newly created DVD and I was shocked at the contrasting quality. (I did watch the VHS tape on a newer CRT TV if that makes any difference). The original VHS tape had much better color and sharpness. My main question is this. How close quality wise will a DVD/VHS conversion look as compared to the original VHS tape? Almost the same or will there always be some quality loss? Given my list of sub-par equipment, what one change would net the most quality improvement? I guess I don't fully understand why getting a better VCR helps. If I'm happy with the picture quality when the VCR is showing the tape on the TV wouldn't that mean that the VCR should be showing the same quality when the image is being captured? I'm leaning toward getting a ATI 9600 video card. If I only change the capture card will I notice any quality improvements? On a side note, I did try using the Avermedia software instead of the AVS4YOU to capture at 720 x 480 7,000 kbps and I didn't think it looked much better. Thanks, and please go easy on me. |
Quote:
As a side note, I don't understand why people continue to use encoders like AVS4YOU when even casual reading on web should steer one away from them. Ok, since you asked and aside from the fact that any better equipment is always desirable, if you can use virtualdub to capture with, installing huffyuv, then encode to mpeg later on with a better choice. It isn't clear to me either whether you actually encoded to mpeg once or twice, if twice, that would cause a big drop in quality. Either way ditch AVS4YOU. Not sure about your capture device either, you may need to replace it either with a better capture device or get a good dvd recorder. In any event, it would be in your best interest to read through as many guides here as possible so that you will learn why things are the way they are. Hope I didn't come across too strongly, others here are more knowledgeable that I and can help you better. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So to answer your question, the one change that would net the most quality improvement would be a good VCR with line TBC. This will help clean and stabilize your tapes for a smoother and nicer capture. Quote:
Anyway, do yourself a favor and have a thorough read of this site. There is no better friend to have for VHS conversion than a firm understanding of the process. Otherwise you're just guessing your way through the test. Hope this has helped. |
you MUST use a good JVC or Panasonic Super-VHS vcr.
anything less will yield sub-par results here is LordSmurfs good VCR list: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...ing-guide.html |
CRT TV is very forgiving to VHS compared to 42" plasma. Apples and oranges. It's possible to have 'what you see is what you get' capture from your sub-par VCR but you need a) better capture device b) lossless capture. Not very practical. Heed the advice of previous commenters and LordSmurfs FAQs.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You do need to pay attention to the "recording modes" and equivalent resolution:bitrate ratios, when using DVD recorders. :2cents: It's easy to make a lousy DVD than it is to make a good quality one. However, you can easily make a DVD that looks better than the tape, if the right hardware (and software, as needed) is used. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The issue is that VHS is noisy. A cheap VCR makes it worse. MPEG compression does poorly on noisy video sources. The only way to capture a 1:1 quality version of a noisy source is to capture it losslessly (or uncompressed). Of course, that's a bit silly, as the goal should be to make it look better. Unless you're working in some sort of law enforcement situation, there's no reason to continue maintaining videos in crappy quality. Improvement should be the goal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I suppose you are also going to say that the AVS4YOU is not good for converting the miniDVD's to play on my AppleTV? I'm not really that big of a tool even though the evidence is mounting against me. |
OT: Even if you needed to convert the MiniDVDs to DVD-spec compliant stream, many of the best tools are FREE.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Editing is optional, not required. And then re-authoring can be done with freeware like Simple DVD Creator (menu-less). See this for freeware authoring discussion: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/dvd-...ee-frills.html Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
When I play the captured file using MediaPlayer it was choppy. Is this normal? |
- Uncompressed 8-bit 4:2:2 YUY2 video is about 75GB/hour.
- Lossless Huffyuv 4:2:2 video is about 35-40GB/hour. - High bitrate 4:2:2 Matrox MPEG-2 is about 20GB/hour, +/- depending on exact bitrate. - DV 4:1:1 is about 13GB/hour. Playback of uncompressed video is lousy. It's not a distribution format (meaning it's not meant to be watched). It's intended for editing and specific archival scenarios. Dropped frames, when dealing with uncompressed video, is usually an I/O issue. Your hard drive is too slow. Even a 7200rpm IDE drive is pushing your luck. With a SATA drive, it's not quite as bad. Uncompressed video more comfortably operates on a RAID array, though you then have all the downsides of using RAID. When capturing Huffyuv or MPEG-2, I almost never drop frames. The exception is VHS frames that are simply shot, and the encoder is fed absolutely garbage signal off the tape. The signal is so screwed up that the TBC can't even make heads or tails of it. That cascades across several parts of the workflow, and that includes dropped frames. The computer needs more time than is allowed to process the mess, so it's just dumped for the next frame. This is an acceptable reason to drop frames (or duplicate them). And when you start working for MS, please let somebody know that Windows 8 looks ridiculous. :p |
As a side note, I've noticed that making VirtulDub's write buffer larger removes the occasional drop I got. Default is 512kB. I've multiplied it with 16 or 32.
When my capture disk can write >100MB/s and has 64MB cache, dropping frames with 5-7MB/s capture was ridiculous. 512kB is not enough for everyone. :) |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I forget this quite often myself. (This and several other settings in VirtualDub. Easy to overlook stuff.) EDIT: I just check the deployed local copies of VirtualDub: Attachment 2895 I think audio buffers should be left low. Not sure how this could potentially affect skew, if at all. Need to read up on it sometime. CPU and disk I/O is still going to be the primary bottleneck. The RAM less so. And when your system has 4GB of RAM, not much need to be stingy with Pentium III type RAM settings! Remember the age of VDub! |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.