Best Windows OS for Hybrid, Avisynth, QTGMC?
I'm getting to more of the processing stage of my capture process. I know for capture that XP is often ideal, but when it comes to processing videos with AviSynth or Hybrid (mainly for QTGMC deinterlacing), what windows operating system gives the best performance in terms of video processing speed/deinterlacing?
My current machine I am choosing an OS for is a Dell OptiPlex 7010 with a Quad Core i7 3rd Gen 3.2GHz and I have Windows XP 32bit running on it right now. Currently it just is using onboard/integrated HD4000 graphics without a separate graphics card. It has 8GB of ram installed, but I believe that can be upgrade all the way to 64GB. So question is whether that is a decent machine for QTGMC deinterlacing and whether say windows 7 64bit would give a significant processing time boost to Avisynth/rendering over 32 bit XP. I know XP can only see something like 3.5GB of ram, but I'm also not sure how much of a factor RAM or a dedicated graphics card are when it comes to using Avisynth. Thanks in advance for any advice! |
Using 64bit Avisynth will give some speed increase, as will switching to 64bit Vapoursynth.
side note: Hybrid stopped supporting Windows 7 for quite a while In general: The more threads are used and the higher the resolution, the more RAM you need. Just using QTGMC on SD and HD content, 8 GB is fine. |
Quote:
|
Personally, I use Hybrid (but I'm obviously biased), but avspmod is probably easier for editing scripts on your own.
|
Quote:
|
I use Windows 11 and mainly develop Hybrid on Windows 11.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Got no problem here playing avi files. Depending on the format you use, using a player like MPC-HC or VLC might work, even if the system has no decoders, since they come with their own decoders. Cu Selur |
Quote:
Quote:
What are you capturing to? You should be using Huffyuv -- and not MT, 64, hacked CCE, etc. Just plain/official Huffyuv. |
Quote:
Thanks for your time Joel Quote:
|
3 Attachment(s)
Lagarith plays fine here on Windows 11 (in MPC-HC), do the attached samples play fine for you?
Cu Selur |
Lagarith has a known byte error that was never fixed.
See this: https://www.digitalFAQ.com/forum/vid...-lagarith.html I rarely see it, but some folks have had worse luck in the past. Most just swapped back to Huffyuv, since Lagarith was just a fork of Huffyuv anyway. The Lagarith fork has more compression, but at cost of more CPU use. And some colorspace wants (not really needs). |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.