![]() |
How different are JVC and Panasonic units?
I've seen this statement come up numerous times by LS and many other members, that JVC and Panasonic players differ from each other, but how exactly? Is it the mechanics? Picture differences? Not owning a Panasonic unit myself, I can't really compare them on my own.
Also, is it true that for the VHS-C tapes it's better to use a Panny VCR? I recall a mention that the JVC decks may eat your tapes. |
@sunk, see LS' answer here
Quote:
|
Yeah, I saw it. Looks informative, but I still have questions regarding VHS-C tapes.
|
The difference in PAL is not huge based on my very limited experience ( a couple of VCRs from each brand).
I did put vhs-c tapes (using an adapter) in both, never encountered an issue. I know others who always use JVC for VHS-C. I personally think (but I am not sure), the information about JVC may eat your vhs-c tape is more like "there is a much lower chance" it will happen with a panny, but JVC will not always surely eat your tape. State of the VCR matters a lot in this particular use-case. Here is what I would do if was you: I have a JVC, vhs-c tapes, not panny, no adapter. I will ask myself, is finding the answer worth 200-300€ to buy a Panasonic? No. I will just buy a good adapter, try with my JVC, if it works, I am happy. If it doesn't now I am sure there is a reason to pay money. This is not advice, I am not saying you should do like me, but just sharing what I would do. |
Certain EOL JVCs do decent at EP/VHS-C tapes. It depends on factors, and gets very model specific, not just generic. The generics are accurate, the exceptions are exceptions.
|
Quote:
|
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.