digitalFAQ.com Forum

digitalFAQ.com Forum (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/)
-   Project Planning, Workflows (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/video-workflows/)
-   -   Please review my video capture setup! (https://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/video-workflows/7403-review-video-capture.html)

sanlyn 07-27-2016 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45080)
Thanks for your advice Sanlyn - I must admit that I was getting slightly confused with the AGP terminology.

So was I at first. I always knew it as "AGP 3.0". Times change.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45080)
I am nearly ready to install and set up the system now but only have 1gb of ram - will this cause an issue for some initial test captures?

1GB is adequate. 2GB would be more helpful for playback/checking captures, but back in 2004 I was using a 1.8GHz intel with 768MB of RAM. Had no problems.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45080)
Also how best should I capture multiple recordings that are recorded over each other leaving the noise bar between recordings?

I've gone through a boatload of those. Capture as much as you want, cut out the junk later.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45080)
Did you mention that I should install XP with SP2 and not SP3?

Lordsmurf recommends SP2. I use XP PC's with both. The newer XP does heavier processing and its antivirus requires SP3. My older captures PC's are SP2. If you're using video apps that require SP3 (my TMPGEnc and a few other apps demand it) you need SP3.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45080)
Do I install the drivers you have attached to your last post with virtualdub? Will I then be ready to capture? Is there a dummies guide for how I get started?

The download in my previous post is the AIW 9600 Pro user guide. Use that guide for AIW install instructions. Once you have the AIW working, there are guides in the forum for VDub that you can get to, but you need the AIW first.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45080)
Finally if you had a choice between those 2 motherboards, which one would you use?

Without the motherboard specks (bus speed, RAM speed, etc.) it's hard to say. It would appear that both are adequate. The AIW's most of us use were made for mainstream consumer PC's circa 2004, so you don't need a power-hungry PC for capture.

-- merged --

Forgot to mention, you might have overlooked the forum's basic VirtualDuib-AVI capture setup. http://www.digitalfaq.com/guides/vid...virtualdub.htm. If you have problems, post the details. Start with short captures, a few minutes, then look it over. When I started out I made 20-minute test captures to get the hang of things.

One of the first things you'll note about this old guide is that it discusses noise reduction and cropping/sizing. Don't even try it, those old filters are way out of date. You can do much better in post processing. A quick capture or two will tell you a great deal, and you can post samples here for evaluation.

willow5 08-03-2016 04:59 PM

Hi all -

I am finally typing this on my newly installed XP computer with SP2 although it has been a right pain to get it this far as MS have withdrawn support for XP and that means all previous Knowledge Base CAB files have also been removed from their site :mad4:

Anyways - now that I have XP running and ATI Catalyst installed, I need to do some basic captures - shall I go ahead and install VirtualDub too ?

Also, I know that this isn't a Windows support forum but I have bought a 3TB HDD but Windows can only see 746.5Gb of it making the rest rather useless - any advice on how I can get XP to recognise the larger amounts ? I read somewhere that XP only supports a maximum of 2TB so I might have to do a 2TB then a 1TB format but that would still be better than 746.5Gb ! Thanks for all your help in getting me this far - really looking forward to doing some cool captures !

edit- Sorry forgot to mention - what is HYDRAVISION and do I need to enable it ?

lordsmurf 08-04-2016 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45148)
Sorry forgot to mention - what is HYDRAVISION and do I need to enable it ?

Nope. Useless.
It's for multiple monitors. You don't need (or want) that on a capture box.

sanlyn 08-04-2016 07:13 AM

Well, last things first:

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45148)
Sorry forgot to mention - what is HYDRAVISION and do I need to enable it ?

I agree 1000% with lordsmurf on this:
Quote:

Originally Posted by lordsmurf (Post 45150)
Nope. Useless.
It's for multiple monitors. You don't need (or want) that on a capture box.

I installed it many years back, wasted a lot of time figuring out how to use it, found it mostly useless and a pain in the neck even for other projects, never installed it again, and never missed it on any of my PCs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45147)
now that I have XP running and ATI Catalyst installed, I need to do some basic captures - shall I go ahead and install VirtualDub too ?

Yes. And huffyuv. Meanwhile VDUb capture at default settings works with almost any ATI AGP card. Of course you'll have to adjust frame size and colorspace (720x480, YUY2), compression (huffyuv), frame rate, and video and audio source from the defaults. For a week now I've been working on an updated post about VDub capture for a thread recently provided by lordsmurf. I hope to post something there soon. As stated earlier, all you need for VDub capture are ATI's basic graphics driver, the capture drivers, and the Control Panel. You don't even need MMC or the video player: there are more advanced media players around today.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45147)
Also, I know that this isn't a Windows support forum but I have bought a 3TB HDD but Windows can only see 746.5Gb of it making the rest rather useless - any advice on how I can get XP to recognise the larger amounts ? I read somewhere that XP only supports a maximum of 2TB so I might have to do a 2TB then a 1TB format but that would still be better than 746.5Gb !

You should post questions about this in the "Computer" forum (http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/computers/) for more expert suggestions. The short answer is that many motherboards, including new ones for old and new Windows versions, won't support 3TB drives without updates to Intel's RST (Rapid Storage Technology) drivers. This happens on 64-bit systems as well. Inquire in the Computer forum so that this thread doesn't get completely hijacked with non-video matters.

Personally I never use a drive or partition larger than 500MB, although I have some external 1TB drives for storage. For capture and even for many post processing/encoding projects, I wouldn't advise using an active, frequently used drive for that much storage. The thought of losing 1 to 3 TB of video work due to hard drive blips from daily operational stress would force me to choose either a quick poison or several years of post traumatic therapy.

willow5 08-05-2016 05:54 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Hi all - thanks for all your replies. I have now set up the card to the best of my abilities following the instructions given and I have got partially there but only have a BW screen with half and half of the picture visible (see attachment). I am connected with composite source but the results are the same with S-Video so I am now not sure where else I am going wrong...any advice on what I should check further ?

Also forgot to mention that the tape I am playing is LP and I don't yet have a TBC - could this be the reason ?

Edit - I have just tried a SP tape and the same is happening so not sure what I am doing wrong...do I need to do something special for PAL ?

sanlyn 08-05-2016 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45156)
Hi all - thanks for all your replies. I have now set up the card to the best of my abilities following the instructions given and I have got partially there but only have a BW screen with half and half of the picture visible (see attachment). I am connected with composite source but the results are the same with S-Video so I am now not sure where else I am going wrong...any advice on what I should check further ?

Haven't you heard that s-video is usually superior to composite?

Try checking the film speed. Your capture is 15 frames per second.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45156)
Also forgot to mention that the tape I am playing is LP and I don't yet have a TBC - could this be the reason ?

LP/SP is not the reason. The tape is a movie. If it's retail, it looks like Macrovision. You need a TBC. And, again, the frame rate is incorrect.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45156)
Edit - I have just tried a SP tape and the same is happening so not sure what I am doing wrong...do I need to do something special for PAL ?

We don't know if your tape is NTSC or PAL. I'm afraid you'll have to tell us. Yes indeed you most certainly must do something different for NTSC or PAL.

[EDIT] If you're thinking of deintelacing this tape later, forget it. The movie is telecined. It looks like hard-coded 3:2 pulldown, so likely it's NTSC.

willow5 08-06-2016 03:08 AM

Hi Sanlyn,

Apologies for not providing all the information. This movie is in PAL and recorded from terrestrial TV (most of my content is this way but most is in SP not LP).

Yes I knew that S-video is better than composite. I was only trying different inputs to see whether composite was behaving the same as S-Video and it seems that it is.

I have also tried increasing the frame rate to 30fps and tried varying screen size/resolution but this hasn't improved the situation.

Could there be a fault with the card?

sanlyn 08-06-2016 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45159)
Yes I knew that S-video is better than composite. I was only trying different inputs to see whether composite was behaving the same as S-Video and it seems that it is.

True, it's not a bad idea to check. With a few tape players, s-video is actually worse.

in VDub capture, under the "Device" top menu, the ATI chip should be the selected capture device.

Under the "Video" top menu use "Preview" mode, not overlay. If you're capturing at 640x480 you can use Overlay if you want, but it's slower than "Preview".

Click "Video" -> "Capture pin...." and see what's in the "Stream format" window. The "Video standard" for the UK and Ireland is "PAL_I". You might also see the choices listed as "PAL_BDHIG" or similar. In any case, choose the PAL format that has the letter "I" in it. If there is no PAL listing with an alpha letter in it, just choose "PAL" if it's there.

PAL is 25fps.

Your Mitsubishi player is hopefully not set to play and output SVHS automatically. If it is, either turn off SVHS output or set output to VHS, or whatever you have for settings on the Mitsubishi player to play and output plain vanilla VHS.

A note about your 640x480 frame size: If you ever want to make shareable DVD or BluRay, 640x480 is not allowed. Just wanted you to be aware that you'll be limited in that regard. The usual 720x576 PAL frame gives you more pixels to work with, more leeway in post processing (did you notice the thick border on the left?), and can always be encoded for 4:3 or 16:9 display aspect ratio by any encoder anywhere.

[ADDED] Which reminds me...

"Video" -> "Capture pin" -"Video standard" entry space refers to the TV tuner, not specifically to composite/s-video input. If the Video Standard reads "NTSC_M" and has no other choices, it means the card has an NTSC TV tuner. If it says some version of "PAL", it has a PAL TV tuner. You should still be able to change the frame rate to 25fps and the frame size to 640x480 (or 720x576) in the other dialog windows. The TV tuner isn't used from VCR composite or s-video.

Ensure that your external capture wiring is secure. After a little use, that purple ATI junction box's connectors can get a little loose, so make sure everything is shoved in tight and secured to the back of the card. Your AVI sample didn't have any audio, either, just noise. Your audio source should be the sound card, not the ATI card.

willow5 08-06-2016 08:28 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Thanks Sanlyn - for some reason in the VirtualDub package there are two exe files - VirtualDubMod.exe and Virtualdub.exe - I was running VirtualDubMod.exe which runs v1.5.10.2 of VirtualDub instead of 1.9.11 so I could not find Capture Pin under the Video menu.

Anyways - I am now running the correct version and have done another capture checking all settings but I still get the same output (see attached running on S-Video output).

I also do not get any PAL option under Capture Pin (see second attachment) - I am not sure whether the card is incorrectly identifying the stream as NTSC ?

I think I am nearly there but need some help to get me across the line :) Thanks for all your help and expert advice

msgohan 08-06-2016 08:47 AM

The video standard is actually set under Capture Filter, not Capture Pin.

You should be capturing any PAL source with a frame height of 576, not 480, by the way. Most (all?) capture devices lock the frame height selection to the video standard, so you likely have no choice once PAL is chosen. Capturing 480 when the source is 576 will either crop the image, as you have seen, or corrupt the interlace structure by skipping lines or resizing.

willow5 08-06-2016 08:54 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I can capture audio now - just changed the audio input setting :)

msgohan 08-06-2016 08:58 AM

Did you get the video capture working? I'm on mobile so I can't check the sample.

I edited post #90 a couple times so you may not have seen the up-to-date version.

willow5 08-06-2016 09:11 AM

1 Attachment(s)
YES - you were right @msgohen - I set it to PAL-I and it works but the colours seem a bit rich...see attached

msgohan 08-06-2016 09:17 AM

The second tab of Capture Filter should be Video Proc Amp, with various options for you to adjust, including Saturation.

willow5 08-06-2016 09:32 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Thanks @Msgohen - I modified the saturation but still not happy with the grainy quality of the colour / general picture quality. Please see attached when you get a chance....is there anything I can do to improve bearing in mind that I do not currently have a TBC...

lordsmurf 08-06-2016 01:20 PM

Don't waste time trying to make anything over 2tb work in XP. Learn to live with a 2tb limit. Best case is the drive works crappily, worst case is it loses its formatting (thus destroying all data on the drive). Don't risk it.

I need to update the VirtualDub guide. Trying to set all NTSC/PAL settings, in all 3 locations, can be easy to overlook -- even when you've been using it for 15 years like I have! (Oops.)

In that last sample, color seems fine. It's standard VHS quality. It just needs mild restoration in Avisynth or VirtualDub.

What VCR was used?

I'm actually more concerned by what appears to be dropped frames. Was that sample from the front of a test capture, or after a few seconds in the middle of the capture?

VirtualDubMod is in our zip/install because it has a narrow usefulness for some types MPEG restoration work.

willow5 08-06-2016 02:03 PM

Thanks for the advice lordsmurf. Will take note of the 2Tb limit and format accordingly. Can I just ask how other members manage with the enormous file sizes? Are the lossless files stored temporarily then deleted after restoration or are they archived permanently? If they are archived permanently then how are they stored? I would guess you would need lots of PB's if you had say 100 odd tapes?

It would be good to update the VDub guide and explain what the various files are in the rar package and when to use each one or perhaps include a readme within the rar?

How do I use VDub to restore? The brightness is lacking and the general quality is grainy - can this be cleaned up? Are there any instructions or beginners guides?

The VCR was a Mitsubishi HS-M1000 (SVHS compatible but the tapes are standard non SVHS). Also please note that I do not yet have a TBC, would this improve the missing dropped frames?

Not sure what you mean by front of a test capture or after a few seconds in the middle of the capture? I simply hit capture while the tape was continuously playing and then hit stop capture afterwards. How can you tell that there are dropped frames?

sanlyn 08-06-2016 03:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by msgohan (Post 45166)
The video standard is actually set under Capture Filter, not Capture Pin.

msgohan, You're absolutely right, and beat me to the punch in posting the bit about Capture Pin. I was making an image of the Capture pin dialog when our local 'net service was interrupted before I could get back to edit the original post. While our 'net was on the blitz I made more pics of other menus for posting later. Just got back our internet a few minutes ago.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45176)
Can I just ask how other members manage with the enormous file sizes? Are the lossless files stored temporarily then deleted after restoration or are they archived permanently? If they are archived permanently then how are they stored? I would guess you would need lots of PB's if you had say 100 odd tapes?

Lossless SD captures don't seem that huge to me. I transfer captures to external USB drives for storage and draw off what I need during processing on my main PC. Everything isn't archived: parts of captures are deleted in processing, some are encoded to high bitrate (15mbps) MPEG2, while more priceless stuff usually stays lossless. I don't know of anyone who keeps intermediate lossless work files. My archives are the many DVD's I made and a few external hard drives.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45176)
It would be good to update the VDub guide and explain what the various files are in the rar package and when to use each one or perhaps include a readme within the rar?

True, but who will write up detailed usage for each of 100-plus filters, most of which a user would never touch. Descriptions of those extras are elsewhere on the 'net, and many are discussed in digitalfaq threads. Those VDUb filters aren't all that are available and don't include over 200 more frequently used Avisynth plugins.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45176)
How do I use VDub to restore? The brightness is lacking and the general quality is grainy - can this be cleaned up? Are there any instructions or beginners guides?

Yes, but they're even more dated than those you saw earlier. Most users learn the details of filtering and cleanup from examples of their use in restoration threads. Many VDub advanced filters such as gradation curves have websites and extensive help and examples. And lots of us just read the filter name or description, pop it into the chain, and watch what happens or doesn't happen.

Below is an image of the original Test3.avi frame 30 (left) -vs- an after-filter version of the same frame (right).
http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/atta...1&d=1470534529

I did very little color correction, but gamma and highlight extension required work with the gradation curve and ColorMill filters in VirtualDub, and I did some edge cleaning and mild sharpening in Avisynth. Raising the midtones and highlights without major changes in black level did a lot to improve perception of the original brightness levels and hues -- a trick that many learned from free internet photo/video correction tutorials for Adobe and Vegas. Much of the noise you mention, however, is due to the dropped and inserted frames mentioned below.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45176)
. Also please note that I do not yet have a TBC, would this improve the missing dropped frames?

Yes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45176)
Not sure what you mean by front of a test capture or after a few seconds in the middle of the capture?

I think LS means, is your sample the entire original capture, or did you capture for a longer period and take your sample from the beginning, middle, or end of the longer capture?

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45176)
How can you tell that there are dropped frames?

During play, look at the motion noise which occurs intermittently, and mild motion stutter. It's easier to see if you open the video in VirtualDub and view it one frame at a time with the single-frame advance buttons. Viewed frame by frame, you'll see that dropped frames were replaced with copies of previous frames. If you want some numbers from Test3.avi, there are duplicate frames in frame pairs 4/5, 20/21, 31/32, 37/38, 47/48, 54/55, 60/61, 67/68, 74/75, 78/79, 83/84, and 89/90, all of which are pairs of duplicate frames.

Otherwise, frankly, it was pretty good for a first workable capture. I'd stay away from strong denoisers with this tape, however, as dnr or other filtering in your player (it has dnr?) looks as if it's causing some posterizing or motion smear. But more normal frame flow might clear that up.

skippy 08-07-2016 05:27 AM

g;day all,new here.[edit] i hope this is the right place to post] i have been following this thread with much interest as i also have been converting my vhs tapes to digital via sony hi8 video camera .i;ve been trying to capture losslessly with vdub and have come to the [my]conclusion that what goes through the hi 8 can only come out as dv video is this correct?. so one of my ?,is how do i capture [lossless] from my old analogue panasonic vid camera that still amazingly works after 5-6 years of no use and no charge..i have a adapter cartridge which in can play in vhs player [panasonic] if it still works and a panasonic dvd recorder. i did a backup of tapes years ago by playing from video camera onto tv and recording tv onto dvd recorder then burnt to discs,ripped these to computer to cut and trim with nero then burn back to dvd for archiving . lots of losses, i know ! . what is the best way for me to capture with what i have or should i buy a capture card.. this seems to be a very helpful forum so i have made a small donation for your troubles...thanks

Admin edit: Answered here: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/vide...-digital8.html

willow5 08-07-2016 11:46 AM

@Sanlyn - thanks again.

I must be doing something wrong then because last night I attempted a capture for approximately 16 minutes and it turned out to be 21Gb - why is it so large and how can I reduce the file size ? If this is the case then extrapolating this data would mean a 3 hour tape would be approx 236Gb, does that sound right?

Thanks for editing my example, it looks better with your filters - please could you provide some brief instructions on how you achieved this ? Should I download Avisynth ? I am a complete novice on this :smack:

Also can I ask what is permanently saved when choosing filters during capture ? For example, are the settings in the Video Proc Amp permanently saved with the capture or can they be changed post capture ? Are there any other settings permanently saved during capture ?

On LS's question, the sample was the entire capture I simply hit capture then quickly hit stop to ensure the size was under 99Mb :)

On the duplicate frames, yes I can see that now - I am getting approx 10% dropped frames, is this too many ? Based on that 16 minute file last night, I had approx 2000 dropped frames.
When you are watching the file back though it is not noticeable - why do they need to be present if they are not noticable when watching the file back ?

msgohan 08-07-2016 12:01 PM

The sample you posted (test3.avi) is uncompressed YUY2. You should be using a lossless compressor.

10% dropped frames is crazy high. It's possible your hard drive isn't keeping up with your uncompressed capture, in which case using Huffyuv etc. could solve this. Even uncompressed SD isn't very taxing for modern HDDs, though.

willow5 08-07-2016 12:19 PM

Thanks msgohen - I installed the lossless compressor from this forum but not sure I activated it. How do I do this in Vdub?

msgohan 08-07-2016 02:15 PM

Go to Video -> Compression while in the Capture mode.

willow5 08-07-2016 03:39 PM

Thanks - I have enabled Huffyuv v2.1.1 in the compression settings and whilst it has significantly reduced a 16 minute file to 8.3Gb, it has introduced some other problems; namely audio sync issues and a slow speed - I would attach it here but I need to know how to edit a 16 minute capture to reduce the file size to less than 99Mb to enable me to upload ?

Also, I am still dropping around 13% of frames so out of 22461 frames, I dropped 2930 - does it matter if the drive I am capturing to is not the OS drive but another SATA drive connected to the same motherboard ? Just going back to the previous issue with audio sync and slow speed, could it be because 2500 frames were inserted ?

Looking around at my settings, does it matter if the "Capture PIN" menu properties show YUY2 but in the "compression" menu, Huffyuv is enabled? Do they both need to be the same ?

msgohan 08-07-2016 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45190)
it has introduced some other problems; namely audio sync issues and a slow speed

Hmm. Not sure what "slow speed" means.

Quote:

does it matter if the drive I am capturing to is not the OS drive but another SATA drive connected to the same motherboard ?
Capturing to a secondary drive is the recommended setup and is much preferred over capturing to the OS drive, so it sounds like you are doing this properly.

Quote:

Also, just going back to the previous issue with audio sync and slow speed, could it be because 2500 frames were inserted ?
If I'm to understand that "slow speed" means motion is jerky, dropped and inserted frames will both cause that. The inserted frames are actually VirtualDub's attempt to keep the audio in sync by adding frames.

Quote:

Also, does it matter if in "Capture PIN" properties, I am capturing as YUY2 but in compression, I enable Huffyuv ?
That is the correct setup. The hardware outputs uncompressed YUY2, which is compressed to lossless via software.

Try a Test video capture (F7) instead of a real capture, during a portion of a tape that contains only normal signals: no starts/stops/blank unrecorded sections. This will capture the video & audio but discard it rather than writing it to disk, to help troubleshooting. Do the stats still show the same number of drops and inserts with Huffyuv? What about with uncompressed?

sanlyn 08-07-2016 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45190)
Thanks - I have enabled Huffyuv v2.1.1 in the compression settings and whilst it has significantly reduced a 16 minute file to 8.3Gb, it has introduced some other problems; namely audio sync issues and a slow speed - I would attach it here but I need to know how to edit a 16 minute capture to reduce the file size to less than 99Mb so I can upload ?

We won't need 16 minutes to spot problems. A few seconds of lossless huffyuv YUY2 would do it, taken from the end of the capture where the audio is definitely out of sync by a noticeable amount.

You can cut out short edits from longer captures and create samples without recompressing or reprocessing the edit, by changing "full processing mode" to "direct stream copy" in VirtualDub before saving your edited sample. Those mode settings are in VDub's "Video" top menu.

Your test3.avi sample was a 3-second uncompressed YUY2 video in 75MB. If it had been lossslessly compressed with huffyuv or Lagarith, the same 3-second file would be 29MB. Typically, YUY2 compressed with huffyuv will fit about 10 seconds of PAL 720x576 YUY2 video into 90MB.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45190)
Also, I am still dropping around 13% of frames so out of 22461 frames, I dropped 2930 - does it matter if the drive I am capturing to is not the OS drive but another SATA drive connected to the same motherboard ?

You have bad audio sync and unstable frame speed and dropped frames because you need a frame-level TBC. You risk slower disk i/o and more dropped frames by capturing to the OS drive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45190)
Also, does it matter if in "Capture PIN" properties, I am capturing as YUY2 but in compression, I enable Huffyuv ? Do they both need to be the same ?

By default, VirtualDub captures to very large uncompressed RGB unless you specify (a) a different colorspace, such as YUY2, and (b) a lossless compressor such as Huffyuv or Lagarith, either of which can compress your YUY2 capture losslessly. If you specify YUY2 but do not specify a compressor, your capture will be uncompressed YUY2 and will be about 2.5X to 3X the size of the same video losslessly compressed with huffyuv. A YUY2 video after lossless compression is still YUY2.

willow5 08-07-2016 04:56 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Thanks both - here is a small clip :)

Attachment 6439

I should clarify what I mean by slow speed - by this I mean Slow Motion i.e. the video is running at what seems to be <1x speed but still smooth and no jerkiness and the audio is out of sync but also has slow motion speed.

Also, stats are bad in uncompressed and compressed mode

I should also mention that it starts fine but 15-20 seconds in and all the problems begin

msgohan 08-07-2016 05:22 PM

For the Direct Stream Copy sample:

Assign the start frame of your sample by hitting HOME on the keyboard.
Assign the end frame by hitting END.
F7 to save your sample clip.

willow5 08-07-2016 05:31 PM

Thanks - uploaded to post #108 :)

msgohan 08-07-2016 05:43 PM

The low-pitched voice is caused by VirtualDub's resampling function trying to correct the sync and badly over-correcting.

See whether sanlyn's Timing Options are any better.*

*EDIT: Umm. The frame rate of the clip is 30.00 fps. Test3.avi was 29.970. You need to set 25 fps in the capture options for PAL. Either Capture Pin or Capture -> Settings. Don't touch the Timing Options until you do another test capture and see whether the correct frame rate is enough to fix things.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45193)
I should clarify what I mean by slow speed - by this I mean Slow Motion i.e. the video is running at what seems to be <1x speed but still smooth and no jerkiness and the audio is out of sync but also has slow motion speed.

The motion is not smooth at all. Many duplicate frames.

willow5 08-07-2016 06:42 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Yes that is MUCH better thanks - it even helps with the dropped frames, now only dropped 6 frames out of 21198 - do I even need a TBC with this low number of dropped frames ?

See below for the capture - any further advice or am I good to go now ?

msgohan 08-07-2016 07:01 PM

Hanover bars are visible, but I don't think you can do anything about this on the capture side. You would deal with them as part of restoration filtering.

willow5 08-08-2016 09:25 AM

Thanks msgohen - how do I process hanover bars with VDub ? Where can I find suitable filters for this noise ? Other than that does it look ok to you ? Do I need a TBC if it only dropped 6 frames out of 21198 ? Should I wait until I have a TBC before I start mass capture ?

sanlyn 08-08-2016 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45201)
Thanks msgohen - how do I process hanover bars with VDub ? Where can I find suitable filters for this noise ?

I'm not aware of a VirtualDub filter for that. I never tried it with VirtualDub, only with Avisynth. Any such filter will soften somewhat, more or less. Others might have a suggestion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45201)
Other than that does it look ok to you ?

Black levels are too high. Color and luma values are compressed into a very small area of the spectrum and the video looks fogged out. For some reason, facial highlights and contours look as if they're being posterized. Does that video have built-in DNR, or did you apply any denoiser during capture??

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45201)
Do I need a TBC if it only dropped 6 frames out of 21198 ? Should I wait until I have a TBC before I start mass capture ?

Yes. Why would want to purposely insure dropped frames? That rate of 6 drops for 14 minutes, if it continued at that rate, would throw audio out of sync by about 1 second after an hour. If you want, you could get by on the cheap by using a used DVd player such as a Panasonic Es10 o ES15 for pass-thru with decent frame sync (it won't defeat Macrovision, though, if that's a concern).

I recorded a couple of VHS tapes off cable that had so much signal noise, I was getting Macrovision effects and image distortion during capture. Cured only by using a full-frame TBC.

willow5 08-08-2016 05:27 PM

Thanks Sanlyn -

Are there any Avisynth tutorials for hanover bars ? I have done a few searches but it seems that you need to be clued up in scripting, is that right ?

To answer your question on DNR, yes there is something called "Intelligent Picture" on this machine which I can disable or set to manual where I adjust the sharpness myself. Shall I disable this permanently ? How do I change the black levels and Colour/Luma values ? Do I do this at capture or post capture ?

Thanks for your advice on TBC - I tried a full 3 hour tape and while the frames dropped were around 25, the audio still seemed to be in sync so it wasn't noticeable but I will try to secure a TBC - they seem to be quite rare especially the DataVideo ones.

Other than that, is there any other advice that I should take note of before I start capturing en masse :)

sanlyn 08-10-2016 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45211)
Are there any Avisynth tutorials for hanover bars ? I have done a few searches but it seems that you need to be clued up in scripting, is that right ?

That's right. Hanover bars usually affect chroma, not luma. Cleanup is best done in a YUV colorspace, which stores chroma data separately from luma. In this case the YUV matrix would be YUY2 or YV12. Low-pass and other filtering techniques have been used, requiring Avisynth.

Frankly I don't think the Hanover effects are enough here to lose sleep about. A more visible problem is false contouring and rough edges instead of smoother gradients or transitions (looks like overly aggressive degraining). Highlights seem a little hot, even when they're not bright. Some annoyances: open your sample "David Bowie interview 25fps sample.avi" in VirtualDub, advance until you get to frame 173, and look at the top of the frame. Besides the thick cyan bar at the top border, all other frames have a line of yellow "dashes" across the top. Quick deinterlace with yadif in VirtualDub shows that these dashes appear only on even-numbered fields. The same pattern is in your other samples.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45211)
Thanks for your advice on TBC - I tried a full 3 hour tape and while the frames dropped were around 25, the audio still seemed to be in sync so it wasn't noticeable but I will try to secure a TBC - they seem to be quite rare especially the DataVideo ones.

25 PAL frames is 1 scond of video -- not disastrous, but not a good sign either. If you were dropping just as many audio frames, which normally happens, you'd be out of sync. You might have missed the comment about tbc pass-through alternatives near the bottom of post #115.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45211)
To answer your question on DNR, yes there is something called "Intelligent Picture" on this machine which I can disable or set to manual where I adjust the sharpness myself. Shall I disable this permanently ?

DNR and sharpening are different things. You can try sharpening less, as VCR sharpeners also sharpen noise. Disable Intelligent Picture for a short capture and see what you get. Post processing is more advanced than most VCR sharpeners or DNR.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45211)
How do I change the black levels and Colour/Luma values ? Do I do this at capture or post capture ?

How did you make the dark "test3.avi" in post #95 to be so much brighter when you captured "David Bowie interview 25fps sample.avi" in post #112?

More importantly If you have clipped darks or brights, it's too late to repair it later. Valid RGB 16-235 levels are checked before capture with the VirtualDub capture histogram. This is especially important since you appear to be using an uncalibrated monitor. Using the histogram are covered in several recent threads. Here's one of them: Using a capture histogram to check proper levels.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45211)
Other than that, is there any other advice that I should take note of before I start capturing en masse

There's a learning to curve to this VHS capture and restoration stuff. Capturing en masse will be very overpowering. I'd start with one or two caps and use them to learn the ropes. Later it gets easier and faster.

willow5 08-19-2016 07:41 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Sorry for the radio silence again - been trying out different things recently and have come to the conclusion that there is a fault with my VCR as it has colour bleed/smearing issues. See attached clip for what I mean (also sorry for the general poor quality of UK TV - I can't be responsible for this output :))

If you look on the lady's multicoloured top, you will see that there are black horizontal lines going onto the dark part of the jumper...can anyone confirm if this can be cleaned up or whether there is indeed a problem with the video player ? I should point out that the tape itself is nearly 20 years old so that may be part of the problem here

Also on a second clip I will attach to another post, there are black flashes at the top of the screen - again would appreciate any advice on this i.e. whether it is hardware related or the age of the tape (similar age to the first clip)....(note if you cannot see the flashes at the top of the screen, please adjust your brightness on your monitor - it was only when I viewed this clip on a full TV that I saw the flashes of bright light)

By the way I have also been playing around with the histogram feature and there is a big difference between what my eyes thinks are good images compared to what is actually a good RGB spread on the histogram !

Thanks for all your help

sanlyn 08-22-2016 07:20 AM

Sorry for the delay. Busy with health matters of elderly relative.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45333)
Sorry for the radio silence again - been trying out different things recently and have come to the conclusion that there is a fault with my VCR as it has colour bleed/smearing issues. See attached clip for what I mean (also sorry for the general poor quality of UK TV - I can't be responsible for this output :))

If you look on the lady's multicoloured top, you will see that there are black horizontal lines going onto the dark part of the jumper...can anyone confirm if this can be cleaned up or whether there is indeed a problem with the video player ? I should point out that the tape itself is nearly 20 years old so that may be part of the problem here

Also on a second clip I will attach to another post, there are black flashes at the top of the screen - again would appreciate any advice on this i.e. whether it is hardware related or the age of the tape (similar age to the first clip)....(note if you cannot see the flashes at the top of the screen, please adjust your brightness on your monitor - it was only when I viewed this clip on a full TV that I saw the flashes of bright light)

Part of the dark lines is in the jumper itself, but the evenly spaced bright/dark pattern is ghosting from the bright contrasting cloth on the arm. This is common with older cable broadcasts and was likely broadcast that way. No effective fix without making things look worse. Also caused by smearing from dnr circuits in many VCR's, but this looks like a defect in the original transmission.

The flicker across the top of the frames is in both samples. On a properly calibrated monitor you don't have to increase brightness to see it. It looks like mistracking or improper tape alignment. Your VCR likely has a tracking adjustment control that could mitigate it. The original tape might have been misaligned during original recording. If you view the brighter flicker frame by frame in VirtualDub you'll see that shapes of objects subtly shift position and shift back again. I don't see much color bleed, but an Avisynth technique used in the original YUV colorspace can make it barely visible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45333)
By the way I have also been playing around with the histogram feature and there is a big difference between what my eyes thinks are good images compared to what is actually a good RGB spread on the histogram !

The capture histogram is a valuable tool, glad to see you're getting the hang of it.

The samples are appreciated, but if you're concerned about file size you should know that both samples are uncompressed RGB, which increases file size. I compressed your samples to what I hope was the original lossless huff/YUY2 and get the following results:

test colour bleed edit.avi: uncompressed RGB = 75.8MB, huffyuv/YUY2 = 41.9MB
white flashes.avi: uncompressed RGB = 99/MB, huffyuv/YUY2 = 37.3MB

willow5 10-02-2016 04:07 PM

Hi Sanlyn,

Apologies for the long silence, I have had other priorities recently so this has taken a bit of a back seat for now.

Thanks for your input, have taken note but please could you elaborate on the Avisynth technique you refer to in your post for further information ?

Also, now I have had a chance to make a few captures, I want to know how best to copy to convert from an avi file into an mpg or other format? I have seen a guide on this very useful forum to download something called Avidemux and configure in the audio and video formats (here: http://www.digitalfaq.com/guides/video/encode-mpeg2-avidemux-pt2.htm) but I have no idea how to tell whether my source is interlaced or not and furthermore what the optimised settings are given my input source. Furthermore, there is a tool called Gspot which identifies whether your source is interlaced or not but when I run it, it doesn't tell me whether my sources are interlaced or not.

Also, on this thread here: http://www.digitalfaq.com/forum/video-editing/6848-merging-avi-dvds.html both you and Lordsmurf refer to the steps to convert to a DVD but I have no DVD authoring software - could you point me in the right direction for this and also what is meant by "MPEG-2 to DVD-Video compliant specs" mentioned in post #5 by Lordsmurf.

Finally, when converting the AVI files into MPG format, is there a quicker way of doing this as it seems to take a very long time to convert i.e. it seems to play it back one second at a time to do the conversion which could take several hours if it is a very long file. Is there any other way? Also, as part of this question, how could I shorten the video down beforehand to make the conversion specific to the start time and stop time I want to capture from and to ? For example, if I have a 20 minute clip but I only wish to convert from 10:00 to 12:05 (down to specific frame number) then how should I go about shortening the file first then converting or do I convert the entire 20 minute file then shorten it ?

Thank you for all your help in getting me this far.

P.S as an unrelated question, I have some MPEG.TS files that I want to edit (i.e. remove adverts from) - which software should I be using and what are the steps?

sanlyn 10-03-2016 07:42 AM

Suggested workflow:

1 - Make a nominally workable lossless capture, attaining proper video levels and tuning player settings for optimal playback. You are still in this stage and learning.

2 - Lossless Cleanup, denoising and repair of common analog defects, color correction, chroma cleanup, saving the results as lossless intermediate working files. Tools: Avisynth and VirtualDub. Along the way, use Avisynth and VirtualDub edit features to discard material you don't expect to keep in the final version.

3 - Lossless input into timeline and/or encoding editors for joining, transitions, special effects and further edits using lossless media, and outputting encoded final delivery formats (DVD, BluRay. AVCHD, MPEG, h.264, etc.) and eventual burning to disc or web posting. Possible choices: Corel (formerly SONY) Movie Studio Platinum, Premiere Elements, or TMPGenc Video Mastering Works, all of which can join losssless input, apply various effects such as transitions, can author for burning, and can burn to disc. You can use freebies like AviDemux if you want but it's basically an encoder -- there are dozens of such freebies, but all of them are more limited than a good NLE package.

4 - For burning to DVD or BluRay disc, most NLE packages that can encode to those formats will also burn to disc. The exceptions are some freebies that are encoders but not authoring or burning apps. An excellent free disc burning app is Imgburn, which some freebies implement internally.

Capture, restoration/repair/correction, joining, applying effects, encoding, and burning to disc are all separate steps. There is no single package that can do it all, even if they advertise that they can. In particular, editors are a very poor choice for restoration and cleanup.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45787)
I have no idea how to tell whether my source is interlaced or not and furthermore what the optimised settings are given my input source

I'm not sure what you mean by optimized settings based on source structure. Analog tape is captured straight through from player to capture device to capture file. Optimal capture settings are directed at valid and workable luma and chroma input levels to avoid clipping brights or crushing darks. If you're thinking of doing something wild such as deintelacing on the fly during capture, all bets are off -- few users in any forum would be willing to help fix video that's purposely damaged during capture. PAL and NTSC analog tapes are almost always interlaced or telecined, and so are tapes made from TV shows. Tapes made from movies are usually telecined, tapes from home movie cameras are interlaced. Some PAL movies are telecined, some use pure interlace, some are speeded up from 24fps to 25fps for PAL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45787)
Furthermore, there is a tool called Gspot which identifies whether your source is interlaced or not but when I run it, it doesn't tell me whether my sources are interlaced or not.

GSpot hasn't been updated in a decade, even if you can get info such as GOP size and whatnot from pre-encoded material. Use MediaInfoXP (http://www.afterdawn.com/software/au...ediainfoxp.cfm or http://muldersoft.com/#mixp). Don't depend 100% on media utilities for the full story. Specifically, many telecined films are listed as "progressive" and often as "interlaced", when in fact many could be progressive with hard-coded pulldown. Learn to determine these things for yourself: Neuron2_How To Analyze Video Frame Structure.zip .

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45787)
Finally, when converting the AVI files into MPG format, is there a quicker way of doing this as it seems to take a very long time to convert i.e. it seems to play it back one second at a time to do the conversion which could take several hours if it is a very long file. Is there any other way? Also, as part of this question, how could I shorten the video down beforehand to make the conversion specific to the start time and stop time I want to capture from and to ? For example, if I have a 20 minute clip but I only wish to convert from 10:00 to 12:05 (down to specific frame number) then how should I go about shortening the file first then converting or do I convert the entire 20 minute file then shorten it ?

You'll either be embarrassed or amazed by the answers to those questions. No one would encode an entire capture to a lossy format and then start chopping away at it, unless they have no understanding of what they're doing. Capture your tape to a lossless file. Then cut the losssless capture as desired with VirtualDub or avisynth. Then make fixes or corrections to your lossless cuts. Then join the pieces in an editor, and encode as the last step.

If it looks as if your encoder is encoding twice, it isn't. It just looks that way, maybe because you don't understand two-pass encoding, which is preferred for most standard formats. The first pass determines the best way to utilize the bitrate you've set up. The second pass is the actual encode. Best for efficient use of bitrate, best for cleanest output and optimal file size. Encoders are slow because they're encoders, not players or simple copying apps.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45787)
I have no DVD authoring software

Then by all means, get some. TMPGenc Authoring Works, Movie Studio Platinum, Premiere Elements, can all work with lossless media input and can output to multiple formats. The one to avoid is cyberlink. You can go for freebies like DVDStyler, AVStoDVD, DVDauthorGUI, etc., but be warned that freebies are generally more difficult to learn, have format limitations, and have fewer features than paid software.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45787)
what is meant by "MPEG-2 to DVD-Video compliant specs" mentioned in post #5 by Lordsmurf.

common PAL specs for valid DVD encoding:

Code:

Video:
Up to 9.8 Mbit/s* (9800 Kbit/s*) MPEG2 video

720x576 pixels MPEG2 (Called Full-D1), usually interlaced or telecined
704x576 pixels MPEG2                  usually interlaced or telecined
352x576 pixels MPEG2 (Called Half-D1), usually interlaced or telecined
352x288 pixels MPEG2

frame rate:
constant 25 fps only, usually interlaced or with pulldown (telecine) applied

Encoded display aspect ratios allowed: anamorphic 4:3 or anamorphic 16:9
16:9 Anamorphic is suppported only by 720x576

GOP Size: 18 frames max, 12 frames min. Commonly encoded as closed GOP's.

Audio:
48000 Hz, 16-bit sampling
32 - 1536 Kbit/s bitrate
Up to 8 audio tracks containing Dolby Digital Ac3, DTS, PCM(uncompressed audio), MPEG-1 Layer2.
One audio track must have MPEG-1, DD/AC3 or PCM Audio.

Total:
Total bitrate including video, audio and subs can be max 10.08 Mbit/s (10080 Kbit/s)

DVD disc folder and file structure are built and formatted by authoring programs for DVD authoring/burning:
http://www.videohelp.com/dvd#struct .

Quote:

Originally Posted by willow5 (Post 45787)
could you elaborate on the Avisynth technique you refer to in your post for further information ?

Avisynth corrections are used with lossless capture in their original captured colorspace after capture, and not used on encoded video. For what it's worth, some of the techniques used to correct levels, chroma bleed and color shift, and defects such as dot crawl or occasional Hanover bars are: the ColorYUV and SmoothAdjust filter for lume and chroma levels, low-pass filters (targeted resizing) and masking of Chroma channels with filters such as FixChromaBleeding() and awarpsharp2(), and smoothing/deblocking filters such as GradFun2DBmod or Gradfun3 for handling posterizing and hard gradient affects. The latter effects are due to overly strong denoising during capture. To get an idea of how these are used we would need some lossless samples that exhibit those problems.

At this point I'd say you're still learning to capture for optimal results that can save a lot of work later. It's good to plan ahead, but don't jump the gun by getting into a rush with troublesome captures.
:wink2:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM

Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.