digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)
-   -   KDVD: The Matrix Trilogy (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/13742-kdvd-matrix-trilogy.html)

Zyphon 08-13-2005 10:53 AM

@gamma

Thank you for your detailed reply.

I shall run some tests using the script that you posed here thanks. :)

Btw those pics with the fingerprints look good also. :)

Prodater64 08-13-2005 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gamma
Prodater64 wrote:
Quote:

Could you take a snapshot to the scene when Smith strike Neo in his face and we can see the finger marks in the Neo's face?
I found the stills where Neo strikes Smith and we see the marks in Smith's face... (thus the other way around :wink: )

Oh, sorry I was confused and thanks.
Very nice.

gamma 08-13-2005 11:25 AM

You're welcome, and thanks.

Dialhot 08-13-2005 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gamma
You're welcome, and thanks.

Okay now stop kidding and tell us you are posting snapshot from the source :lol:

Honnestly I'm quite sure that I would have never try to compile the three movies on a single disc, even if I know what can be done with KDVD. The only thing that does not please my tastes in what you did is that you had to use the 2.0 audio track to accomplish that.

Prodater64 08-13-2005 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Honnestly I'm quite sure that I would have never try to compile the three movies on a single disc, even if I know what can be done with KDVD. The only thing that does not please my tastes in what you did is that you had to use the 2.0 audio track to accomplish that.

As myself.

One of my favourite "audio scenes" is first movie, begin, when Trinity is running across the metal roof, and when she meets the truck.
Surely it is not the same with 2.0 audio at 128 kbps, but anyway gamma's work is very nice.

Zyphon 08-13-2005 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Okay now stop kidding and tell us you are posting snapshot from the source :lol:

Lmao. Nice one Phil I nearly fell off my chair I was laughing so hard when I read this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Honnestly I'm quite sure that I would have never try to compile the three movies on a single disc, even if I know what can be done with KDVD. The only thing that does not please my tastes in what you did is that you had to use the 2.0 audio track to accomplish that.

It is certainly an achievment to get all those movies onto one DVD as they all go 2 hours each

The matrix is 2hr 16min, Matrix Reloaded is 2hr 18min & Matrix Revolutions is 2hr 9min.

That is a total of 6hr 43min total. This for one DVD is a hellava lot which is why I never attempted it in the past for fear of bad quality video.

I don't personally feel I could sacrifice the AC3 5.1 audio in favour of the AC3 2.0 as this renders my 5.1 surround system more or less redundant and I love to hear all the effects as if it were in the cinema. :)

Having said that it is still great that gamma has made these films fit onto one DVDR.

I have been thinking of buying a DVD9 burner then I might attempt to back these 3 up to one DVD. :)

gamma 08-13-2005 03:59 PM

Dialhot wrote:
Quote:

Okay now stop kidding and tell us you are posting snapshot from the source
LOL! It's REALLY the kdvd :D

Dialhot wrote:
Quote:

The only thing that does not please my tastes in what you did is that you had to use the 2.0 audio track to accomplish that
Yeah, I don't like that either. I haven't got a surround-set so I don't need the 5.1, yet. When I get a surround-set, I definitely make 1:1 backups of these movies!

Zyphon wrote:
Quote:

The matrix is 2hr 16min, Matrix Reloaded is 2hr 18min & Matrix Revolutions is 2hr 9min.
As I said, I've cut the credits!

Zyphon wrote:
Quote:

Having said that it is still great that gamma has made these films fit onto one DVDR
Thanks.

kwag 08-13-2005 04:48 PM

Hey gamma,

Those screenshots are superb :D
Can I post (link) some of them on the main page, so that some people at "the other sites" can see the truth :?: :lol:

Great work!,
-kwag

Zyphon 08-13-2005 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
Hey gamma,

Those screenshots are superb :D
Can I post (link) some of them on the main page, so that some people at "the other sites" can see the truth :?: :lol:

Great work!,
-kwag

Amen to that. :D :lol:

Zyphon 08-14-2005 02:18 AM

If memory serves, is the fact that The Matrix series is a pretty dark movie that enables it to compress well?

I have always wanted to put 3 Alien movies onto one DVD. I know what you are going to say: 'There are 4 Alien movies', but lets be honest Alien 3 sucked and I am not including that one.

This post has given me the insperation to try a project with Alien 1,2 & 4.

Those movies should compress well because they are dark as it add to the atmosphere of the movies so hopefully they should compress well. :)

gamma 08-14-2005 07:15 AM

Kwag wrote
Quote:

Hey gamma,
Those screenshots are superb :D
Thanks! :D

Quote:

Can I post (link) some of them on the main page, so that some people at "the other sites" can see the truth :?: :lol:

Great work!,
-kwag
Absolutely! That would be great! :D

If you want/need any other specific screenshots, let me know!

Dialhot 08-14-2005 07:40 AM

Alien should compress a lot better. Matrix movies are dark, right, but also a lot more complex (in terms of video encoding) than Alien ones. Much more action and encoder nightmare like rain, flashes, explosions, dust...

Zyphon 08-14-2005 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dialhot
Alien should compress a lot better. Matrix movies are dark, right, but also a lot more complex (in terms of video encoding) than Alien ones. Much more action and encoder nightmare like rain, flashes, explosions, dust...

Thanks for that info Phil, I shall give it a try then. :)

kwag 08-14-2005 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gamma
Absolutely! That would be great! :D

If you want/need any other specific screenshots, let me know!

Thanks gamma :)
I just posted it :!:
Some people "Can't handle the truth" :mrgreen:

-kwag

gamma 08-14-2005 04:02 PM

kwag wrote:
Quote:

Thanks gamma :)
You're welcome! :D

Quote:

I just posted it :!:
Cool! Looks very nice! 8)

Quote:

Some people "Can't handle the truth" :mrgreen:
I agree.....they need to "grow up" :)

Zyphon 08-14-2005 04:23 PM

@kwag

Hi Karl,

I just looked at the main portal to this site and those pics of gamma's encodes look awesome. :)

That should hopefully silence a few critics. :D

Nice work gamma. ;)

Prodater64 08-14-2005 04:36 PM

@kwag:

A little bit exagerated, don't think so.
Maybe one under another would be better, or imageshack pics pointing to big pictures.
Well, you are the boss.
8)

kwag 08-14-2005 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prodater64
@kwag:

A little bit exagerated, don't think so.

Not at all Pro :)
You should see the comments on other sites (***help.com, etc.) related to KVCD/KDVD, where they say it's trash and S***!
Well, we just keep proving them wrong :mrgreen:

EDIT: I guess you meant the picture sizes? :oops:
I thought you were refering to the comments/post :lol:

-kwag

Prodater64 08-14-2005 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwag
EDIT: I guess you meant the picture sizes? :oops:
I thought you were refering to the comments/post :lol:
-kwag

Of course.

:rotf:

supermule 09-06-2005 06:02 AM

hmmm this post is really interesting and definitely proves that KDVD works.

BTW, how much time did it take to encode!!!! (if you remember by now).

PS: I tried doing it using MC MPEG encoder(cos of its speed) with KVCD notch matrices and failed miserably, have to give TMPEGEnc a go.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.