Quantcast KVCD: DVD2AVI 1.76 and Not the Latest Version? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
01-27-2004, 07:57 PM
vdk_au vdk_au is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've being using 'KVCD From scratch ? A Users guide v1.1' a while for now and i'm wondering why it tells us to use dvd2avi 1.76 and not the latest version. I've being using v1.77.3 but don't know what the difference is, can someone tell me why the guide needs to use 1.76?
And one more thing, when i use version 1.77.3 instead of converting the audio to wav and then encoding it into mp2 with headache, i demux the audio and then i encode with headache which i find much quicker to do. Is there any difference in these two methods?

Thanks alot!
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
01-27-2004, 09:26 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdk_au
I've being using 'KVCD From scratch ? A Users guide v1.1' a while for now and i'm wondering why it tells us to use dvd2avi 1.76 and not the latest version. I've being using v1.77.3 but don't know what the difference is, can someone tell me why the guide needs to use 1.76?
Because the guide has not been updated in a while
Quote:
And one more thing, when i use version 1.77.3 instead of converting the audio to wav and then encoding it into mp2 with headache, i demux the audio and then i encode with headache which i find much quicker to do. Is there any difference in these two methods?
What you are doing, is the correct way to do it

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
01-27-2004, 09:43 PM
vdk_au vdk_au is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks alot for the reply. But i got one more question. Is the quality different when i resample the 48kHz audio down with dvd2avi with ultra high then when i do it with headac3he.

And when the admin said the method i was doing was right. Which method gives me the better sound, the wav to mp2, or the demux and then to mp2.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
01-27-2004, 11:27 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdk_au
Thanks alot for the reply. But i got one more question. Is the quality different when i resample the 48kHz audio down with dvd2avi with ultra high then when i do it with headac3he.
Don't resample
Just demux.
Quote:

And when the admin said the method i was doing was right. Which method gives me the better sound, the wav to mp2, or the demux and then to mp2.
Demux (which means extract the AC3 audio) and then encode to mp2, is better than extracting to WAV, and then encoding to .mp2, because you're actually converting from AC3->WAV and then to mp2 instead of just converting AC3->MP2.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New version DVD2AVI 1.77 andybno1 Video Encoding and Conversion 21 04-08-2004 08:11 AM
Versión DVD2AVI ? leocant Convertir y Codificar Video (Español) 4 07-09-2003 11:52 AM
Does anyone have the latest freeware version of VCDEasy? audioslave Authoring VCD, DVD, Blu-ray 3 06-25-2003 10:23 AM
New version DVD2AVI 1.83 ovg64 Video Encoding and Conversion 0 05-13-2003 09:20 PM
Latest version of KVCD Predictor nicksteel Avisynth Scripting 1 02-26-2003 10:23 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd