Quantcast digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] - Search Results
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Ask Question   FAQ     Today's Posts
Showing results 1 to 12 of 12
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: Dialhot
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 06-05-2004, 09:39 PM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
I don't see what is your problem : CQMatic does...

I don't see what is your problem : CQMatic does its job, find the CQ (79.52) and laucnh the real encode.

Where is your problem :?:
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 06-05-2004, 06:35 PM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
English please :!:

English please :!:
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 06-05-2004, 02:59 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
Nothing; Only experience and experiment are...

Nothing; Only experience and experiment are talking there.
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-03-2004, 05:50 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
You surely have an audio source defined in your...

You surely have an audio source defined in your tmpgenc project; You must let this field empty for CQM to work.
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-02-2004, 05:42 PM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
Okay, so you have to stay in 29.97.

Okay, so you have to stay in 29.97.
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-02-2004, 05:24 PM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
No you don't have to do that has using 23.976...

No you don't have to do that has using 23.976 with 3:2 pulldown won't change the length (in minute) of your video, so the length of the audio shouldn't be modifeid either, and in other words, you...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-02-2004, 09:11 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
Never is a big word. But "it is not a very good...

Never is a big word. But "it is not a very good thing to process like this" is better.

DVD2AVI is very bad at downmixing (going from 5.1 to stero WAV). Headac3che or besweet do that a lot better....
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-02-2004, 08:57 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
Nothing but the CQ result is very unpredictable. ...

Nothing but the CQ result is very unpredictable.
Try CQMAtic, it will perhaps find a CQ more accurate for your work.

NOTE : WHY DO YOU USE 29.97 ? You should better do 23.976 MPEG2 with "3:2...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-01-2004, 11:03 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
Right. 164/192*112 = 95 Mb ! For 167...

Right.


164/192*112 = 95 Mb !

For 167 min audio file size is :

- 140 MB at 112 Kbps
- 160 MB at 128 Kbps
- 200 MB at 160 Kpbs
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-01-2004, 07:46 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
1200 starts to be low indeed. Try to lower your...

1200 starts to be low indeed. Try to lower your min to 64 and see if your standalone can support that (make a test on a 10 min sample taht's enought).


???
From 224 to 112 ? Are you sure you...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-01-2004, 07:26 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
That is known as "manual prediction" and it's far...

That is known as "manual prediction" and it's far more accurate than Tok. But if you want to use an automatic tool for that, better than tok, you can try CQMAtic (see the related section of the...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 03-01-2004, 06:02 AM
Replies: 34
Views: 2,174
Posted By Dialhot
GO in the SSRC tab and put 44100 as resample...

GO in the SSRC tab and put 44100 as resample frequencies, then return back to besweet tab(hte main one) and check the box "SSRC".


You use 224 as bitrate for audio. You can go down to 112 with no...
Showing results 1 to 12 of 12

 

 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Top of Page  -  Site Home  -  Forum Home  -  Archive  -  Forum Policies