digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]

digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/)
-   Video Encoding and Conversion (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/)
-   -   CCE with DVD-REBUILDER does not support KVCD Notch Matrix! (http://www.digitalfaq.com/archives/encode/10662-cce-dvd-rebuilder.html)

The Untouchable 07-03-2004 06:33 PM

Jus did "A BUGS LIFE" gold edition: which is 95 mins long,
but also has the widescreen version on the same disc so its just over 3 hrs long. Basicly I did a 3hr & 10 minute movie with menus,extras & all english audio & all subtitles in 6 hrs (converted to VOB's & all)
All with DVD-Rebuilder 0.54 + CCE 2.67 & the "KVCD Notch Matrix"
let me tell u the quality is that unmatched by any transcoder i've ever seen ( & i've tryed em all)

I did a test on this movie with deen before undot & it looks worse that way
using a brand new flat screen 19 inch monitor & geforce 3 video card I came to this conclusion & I'll stick to my original findings & say to
all "Always put undot b4 deen"
try it you'll see.
this was script for DVD-Rebuilder ...

Undot()
Deen()
LetterBox(16, 16, 16, 16)

Did anyone else give rebuilder a shot??

jorel 07-03-2004 06:44 PM

OT in...!
bugs life gold edition with widescreen and 95 minutes long!?!? :o
i don't knew that...monday i will find it! :D i love "this type" of bugs!
OT out..!

The Untouchable,
like i wrote i don't saw differences in my short sample and long tests as you did, are always better.....if anyone more could do more tests will be great! :wink:
but tell us...what was worse using deen before undot? :?
hey, i need to test DVD-Rebuilder !

glent2k3 07-04-2004 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Untouchable
Quote:

I don't see the point to keep all extras as they often take half of the DVD :-(. Menu and audio, that's cool.
I don't mean extras as in previews for other movies, i mean extras as in hmmm example what was that new movie with the cartoon goldfish?
it had a game u could play lol thats cool !! finding nemo 8)
great present for a nephew/niece who r younger

SORRY BUT IT IS ILLEGAL TO BACKUP DVD AND DISTRIBUTE THEM.BACKUPS SHOULD BE ONLY MADE FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY.READ THE THREAD DISCLAIMER.

The Untouchable 07-04-2004 10:22 PM

In canada it's perfectly legal to make a backup for private viewing
(as long as you dont sell them) !!

Dialhot 07-05-2004 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Untouchable
In canada it's perfectly legal to make a backup for private viewing
(as long as you dont sell them) !!

But not to offer it to your nephew :!:
Private is private and generally stands for "inner family circle". But you have the right to backup them to let your nephew watch them AT YOUR HOME insteed of using the original DVD. That's what (and why) I started KVCD in fact :-)

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 04:28 AM

... :P 8)

Dialhot 07-05-2004 07:12 AM

BTW : I'm currently using DVDRebuilder and the results are promising.

I'm doing Titanic, that is the perfect "client" for that : 3h long, no extras on the DVD (so no space lost), a lot of underwater scenes (of course ;-)), a lovely naked lady.. hum... that's not important indeed :-p

The quality is below what I have with Q mode generally but if the tool can do all the job in one click, then I will live with that little loss in quality. Doing a DVD with 2 language an 1 subtitle takes me generally all day long (DVD2AVI + Subrip + AC3Machine + CCE + DVD-Lab) ! Here the job should be performed in 5-6 hours and the original menu is supposed to be still present :-)

Just have to wait :-)

Note: they are a lot of option to setup manually before to do the first encode. Be carrefull if you try it !

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 07:47 AM

Thing is it'll take about 5-6 hours on an "Athlon XP / P4"
But that is for a 3 hour movie
I did forrest which is 2 h & 15 mins i think & it took only 4 hrs & 45 mins
But the main idea is time & i step (click)
Besta luck to ya phil !!
C U in 5 hrs 8)

quality is beautiful for me ... better than alotta other encodes i have done in the past tho
But you aswell as I know it's actually CCE thats doing the encoding.

Dialhot 07-05-2004 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Untouchable
Thing is it'll take about 5-6 hours on an "Athlon XP / P4"

That will take a little longer as I encode at speed 0.70 and the job is performed in 2pass ( I forgot that :-))

Quote:

I did forrest which is 2 h & 15 mins i think & it took only 4 hrs & 45 mins
I hope you set these option correctly :
- uncheck "convertoToYUY2"
- check "disable deinterlace" (except if you DVD was really interlaced)
- used "advanced avs script" option to set "Deen()/Undot()" as filter to be used in all script

With that all seems to be correct. The only drawback is the encoding cell by cell that prevent to know of much time is still expected before the end :-)

Quote:

quality is beautiful for me ... better than alotta other encodes i have done in the past tho
You talked about recoder, that's not the same ! For sure with a need in compression about 49.5% like I need for this movie, no recoder can do the job (recoder = dvdshrink or DVD2One for instance).
But quality is clearly below Q mode in CCE. And that is mainly due to this "cell by cell" way of processing : the 2pass bitrate optimization can't be performed on the whole movie as it is supposed to be :-(.

I just hope that subtitles will be in synch as that is the part that give me real pain in the ass generally.

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 08:06 AM

I also do it at 2pass

But converttoyuv2 was left checked at default oops?
& I checked mpeg2source idct ect ect oops?

Dialhot 07-05-2004 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Untouchable
But converttoyuv2 was left checked at default oops?

That's not so important. There is an opened point to know if it's better to let the system to perform the space color conversion or if it's better to have avisynth to do it before to feed the encoder. Noone really had the time to perform complete tests on that :-)

Quote:

& I checked mpeg2source idct ect ect oops?
Lol. Also there is not importance : idct=7 speeds up things on P4 as it uses SSE2 intruction. No diff in quality, just speed. I use it also.

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 08:24 AM

Sh%t phil I screwed up man, I thought that once I turn "disable interlace" on that it would stay on. But now I messed up, it goes back to off by default automaticly, I failed to see that & backed up 3 of my movies already which aren't interlaced
SO NOW ... due to me ecoding a non interlaced source as interlaced ...
is this bad or make things slower or pic worse or does it make the dvd not play right on certain players? please do answer
thankx 8)

Also I dont have a p4 its an amd athlon xp so is this also bad if i use mpeg2source icdt?

Dialhot 07-05-2004 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Untouchable
SO NOW ... due to me ecoding a non interlaced source as interlaced ...

Not necessary : I thing that the tool trus DVD2AVI analisys. It's often wrong but not anytime. So with a little luck your DVD were encoded correctly.

Quote:

is this bad or make thing slower or pic worse or does it make the dvd not play right on certain players? please do answer
If there weren't interlaced, but encoded as if they were, the result is clearly unwatchable ! Any movement of the camera will make you sick !
That's how I saw that my current job was done interlaced : I checked the first m2v once it was encoded and... :puke:

Quote:

Also I dont have a p4 its an amd athlon xp so is this also bad?
No, you won't have the speed benefit of idct=7, that's all.

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 08:37 AM

hmmm well i've done 3 movies that were NOT interlaced
& encoded them as INTERLACED but they all look fine
why are your copys unwatchable & mine are clear ?

Dialhot 07-05-2004 08:42 AM

You are NTSC and am I PAL perhaps ?
I mean that NTSC has 2 fps that correspond generally to interlaced (29.970) or progressive (23.976). In Pal we use 25 for both and that surely make things a lot more noticiable.

(OT: for your widescreen DVD problem in other thread, DVDRebuild also indicate 4:3 in the main window when the DVD is not anamorphic, like the one I'm currently doing)

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 08:45 AM

so does this mean i should redo them?
do u think power dvd 4.0 automaticly deinterlaces & that i just havent sen it for that reason?
they looked fine on the tv

Dialhot 07-05-2004 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Untouchable
so does this mean i should redo them?
do u think power dvd 4.0 automaticly deinterlaces & that i just havent sen it for that reason?
they looked fine on the tv

TV are ALWAYS interlaced, even if the DVD is progressive (standalone does the interlacing).
If they look fine, why bother ?

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 08:55 AM

what part of dvd2avi shouldent be trusted?
here it says progressive (in dvd2avi)
but looks interlaced (in the pic from dvd2avi)

Dialhot 07-05-2004 09:02 AM

Trust your eyes.
In my case taht was the opposite (detected as interlaced but in reality progressive).
But VERY FEW DVD are interlaced. Generally they are material issued from TV (live performance or TV shows). But blockbuster movies are almost all progressive.

The Untouchable 07-05-2004 09:24 AM

in that case ... i only screwed up on 2 because bruce almighty turns out to be interlaces but detected in dvd2avi as progressive


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd

Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.