Quantcast KVCD Templates - Best of the Best? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
09-05-2002, 01:26 AM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kwag,
Correct me if I'm wrong, KVCD-Plus and KVCDx3 use the same Q. Matrix, GOP are also the same, the only difference is the resolution. So, what makes KVCDx3 better than KVCD-Plus (Best of the best)? Do KVCD-Plus (704x480) and KVCDx3 have the same qaulity?
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
09-05-2002, 09:14 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk2c11
Kwag,
Correct me if I'm wrong, KVCD-Plus and KVCDx3 use the same Q. Matrix, GOP are also the same, the only difference is the resolution. So, what makes KVCDx3 better than KVCD-Plus (Best of the best)? Do KVCD-Plus (704x480) and KVCDx3 have the same qaulity?
KVCD 704x480 PLUS is higher in resolution, but it's not so good for very high action scenes, because there's not enough bit rate to make blockless scenes on very fast motion. If you compare both on a regular TV, there's no visual difference. Only on a HDTV you can see the 704x480 slighlty sharper. But then the file size is also much larger on the 704x480. I prefer the KVCDx3, because it's the best balance between resolution and bit rate for a greater visual experience.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
09-11-2002, 08:11 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kwag,
Having mentioned the high bitrate in KVCDx3, the latest KVCD-Plus (704x480) template also has the same Max. bitrate as KVCDx3. Does it mean that they both perform well in high action sences? Also, I have tried to set the "Blocks--TV overscan" to 2 when using KVCD-Plus (704x480), the output looks good in TV, both sides are filled up. The file size is much smaller than before (without Blocks--TV overscan=2).

I have a Sony 29" flat-trinitron (only 2 years old), I don't know if it is a HDTV (or sort of)? but I see blocks in dark scene, especially those scenes with a complete black background (I tried both KVCDx3 and KVCD-plus 704x480).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
09-11-2002, 08:19 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk2c11
Kwag,
Having mentioned the high bitrate in KVCDx3, the latest KVCD-Plus (704x480) template also has the same Max. bitrate as KVCDx3. Does it mean that they both perform well in high action sences? Also, I have tried to set the "Blocks--TV overscan" to 2 when using KVCD-Plus (704x480), the output looks good in TV, both sides are filled up. The file size is much smaller than before (without Blocks--TV overscan=2).

I have a Sony 29" flat-trinitron (only 2 years old), I don't know if it is a HDTV (or sort of)? but I see blocks in dark scene, especially those scenes with a complete black background (I tried both KVCDx3 and KVCD-plus 704x480).
Hi syk2c11,
Do you see blocks on the x3 sample on your TV?
Also, the MAX bit rate in the x3 is higher, It's set to 2,500Kbps. In the x2, it's 2,300Kbps.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #5  
09-11-2002, 08:27 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kwag,
The KVCDx3 sample was made with bright scene, it was very good. I used the KVCDx3 template without a change, I see blocks in dark scene.

Do you remember that you amended the KVCD-plus (704x480) by changing the max bitrate from 2300 to 2500 and changing the CQ from 15 to 12? This is the one I am talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
09-11-2002, 09:39 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi syk2c11,
Something is wrong
I haven't seen any blocks on the x3 movies I've done. Specially "The Matrix", which is a pretty dark movie. And that's on my HDTV. Not even in the computer monitor. Are you processing from a .d2v file? If you are, check that you are setting TV scale and not PC scale in DVD2AVI. Then in TMPEG, you "uncheck" the "Output data as basic Y...." etc.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #7  
09-11-2002, 09:50 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Got it. I will give it a shot and let you know the result. Many thanks, Kwag.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
09-11-2002, 10:32 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Kwag (and everyone),
I have double checked it and found that my settings in DVD2AVI and Tmpeg are exactly the same as you suggested. My source is VOB ripped from DVD, I processed VOBs by DVD2AVI (I did select "TV scale"). In Tmpeg, I did uncheck "Output data as basic Y....".

In fact, when Tmpeg is encoding, I can see blocks (in dark area) on that tiny window (from TV monitor, while it was encoding). What else can I try?

I personally prefer KVCD-plus (704x480), although it has blocks in dark area too (may be it is only my problem). This template also enables me to use the "time-search" function while KVCDx3 cannot be time searched.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
09-12-2002, 12:46 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk2c11
In fact, when Tmpeg is encoding, I can see blocks (in dark area) on that tiny window (from TV monitor, while it was encoding). What else can I try?
You got me on this one syk2c11 . I've never seen blocks on TMPEG's monitor window. Maybe you have a CODEC problem. Do you process the .d2v directly, or with an .avs script?
If you use AviSynth, try installing the latest version 2.05. You may also check your MPEG2DEC.dll version. Try to get the latest.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #10  
09-12-2002, 01:16 AM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Kwag, I will keep tracking it down. If I find the "trouble maker", I will post it for everyone then.

By the way, here is the flow: Smartripper-->DVD2AVI-->FitCD-->Vdub-->Tmpeg.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
09-13-2002, 08:18 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OK, I removed the old version of avisynth.dll from the folder of system32, i re-intalled a new version of avisynth 2.05, I have also re-installed the newest version of FitCD. The only thing that I didn't change was DVD2AVI, I am still using 1.76. I still see blocks in Tmpeg's monitor window (only in black area)!!

I select "IEEE 1180...", TV scale, "YUY..." in DVD2AVI, is it the correct setting? If so, what to try next? By the way, I placed avisynth.dll in BOTH folders of "system" and "system 32", is that a problem? Thanks in advance for anyone who can help (or try to help).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
09-13-2002, 09:20 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi syk2c11,

It's not a good practice to have the .dll in two folders. Remove the one under \system.
My settings on DVD2AVI under IDCT 32 bit MMX, TV scale and YUY.
I am also using version 1.76.
Again, what happens if you open the .d2v directly with TMPEG instead of the .avs? Do you still see the blocks? If you don't, the problem is either MPEG2DEC.dll or AviSynth.
Try that!,

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #13  
09-13-2002, 10:12 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Kwag! I will try it. I believe you suggested to IEEE-1180... somewhere in the forum before. What is the diffference between IDCT 32 bit MMX and IEEE-1180? Thanks anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
09-13-2002, 10:59 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk2c11
Thanks Kwag! I will try it. I believe you suggested to IEEE-1180... somewhere in the forum before. What is the diffference between IDCT 32 bit MMX and IEEE-1180? Thanks anyway.
I read in the documentation, or on DVD2AVI's site but I don't remember now, where the author explains the differences. Mathematically, IEEE-1180 is the highest presicion. Visually, there's no difference if you use either. So use 32 bit MMX, which is the fastest mode. That's his suggestion.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #15  
09-15-2002, 10:18 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi everyone,
I have tried to load the d2v file directly into Tmpeg, NO BLOCKS! (in Tmpeg's monitor window) But after using FitCD and frameserving through Virtual Dub, I see blocks in Tmpeg's monitor window (of course, the final output also has blocks in black area when viewing in TV). I have checked the screenshot of FitCD provided by Kwag, I found one difference between my own setting and Kwag's one, that is the slider right above "interlaced resizing" (at the very bottom of the screen), mine is set to "position centre", but Kwag's is set to "position marcoblock aligned". What this little setting does?

I have re-installed the newest version of FitCD and Avisynth, and I have to use VDub to add subtitle. Any suggestions, please! Also, in Virtual Dub, there is a setting called "Compression" under the Video tap, should we select "uncompressed RGB"?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
09-15-2002, 10:49 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi syk2c11,

Did you try another version of MPEG2DEC.dll

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #17  
09-15-2002, 10:51 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Kwag,
What is the lasest version? I downloaded it from doom9.org
Reply With Quote
  #18  
09-15-2002, 11:32 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mine is dated 4/4/2002, and file size is 184KB.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #19  
09-15-2002, 11:40 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Where can I get it? Mine is dated 16-Aug-2001, 184k.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
09-15-2002, 11:42 PM
syk2c11 syk2c11 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Where can I get it? Mine is dated 16-Aug-2001, 184k.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old kvcd templates? buzz86 Video Encoding and Conversion 1 07-27-2004 04:54 PM
KVCD: Which templates are best? FedEx Video Encoding and Conversion 2 05-14-2003 08:11 PM
KVCD: Is cq value always the same with all templates? big Video Encoding and Conversion 1 04-23-2003 04:46 PM
KDVD: Which templates are DVD Compliant templates? Racer99 Video Encoding and Conversion 1 02-13-2003 11:27 AM
KVCD: Which templates to use ? miksmith Video Encoding and Conversion 0 12-09-2002 07:17 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd