Quote:
Originally Posted by ckdexterhn
PyRoMaNiA, why do you encourage this guy?
|
I don't know, I just like testing things...
...although I very much doubt these templates are anything better than KVCD, but I'll try to keep an open mind anyway.
@"Encoder Master"
Wow,
thats a big selection of Q-matrices...although they look a bit basic to me compared to the
KVCD Notch. I compared the
AVCD 120 minute NTSC template to the
KVCDx2 352x240 NTSC and
KVCDx2 352x480 NTSC templates, as they are both rated at 120 minutes average.
But based on my results.... no offence meant but your templates do
suck ....120 minutes a CD better than VCD quality? Doesn't look like it to me...standard VCD would look nicer. Mosquitos all over the place, the KVCD 352x240 version was
much cleaner. The 352x480 encode I did looked a bit sharper at least, and in most places looked better than the AVCD one, there were a few more DCT blocks because of the higher res though...but I would still favour it over the AVCD version.
I tried to make it a fair test, so I made sure all the files were around 1.03MBs, as the AVCD one was. The default settings on the KVCD templates still looked quite a bit better than AVCD......I only raised the CQ to try and make it a fairer test...I used the same AviSynth script on all tests, although it seems to me that you never used an AVS script with your AVCD templates before, but the KVCD versions were
still superior.
Did you actually try the KVCD templates yourself? I recomend you do.
If you want to stick with your AVCD thats fine with me, but I think I'll carry on using KVCD, as I have been.