![]() |
Quote:
CQ=51.75: Difference: 0.974991 CQ=51.75: Difference: 0.974991 ... m1v.Sample-filesize with 51.75-CQ: 2,392,064 Bytes m1v-filesize with 51.75-CQ: 3,973,120 Bytes Any idea :?: |
@krassi,
I have the same problem starting with a CQ of 60. Code:
CQMatic Versoin 1.0 Beta 1Fiz. |
Quote:
|
I'm having the same problem as Krassi and Fiz where after 2 prediction samples, CQMatic keeps sampling at the same CQ! I find that if I cancel and restart with a CQ closer to the "stuck" value, that prediction completes as normal. Very weird bug.
|
I'm having the same problem also with the resampling of the same cq after 2 tries.
David |
Hey! Same problem with repeating CQ here too!
|
Working on it ....
-kwag |
Please download this: www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-test.exe
Try to use the same starting CQ that continued in a loop. See if this fixes that. -kwag |
Quote:
|
Quote:
sorry :!: :oops: :imstupid: :x The condition shouldn't repeat :!: I'm updating the regular cqmatic.exe to the same version as that test file now ( BETA 2 ) -kwag |
I'm sorry to inform you that its still there. It only needed about 10 tries to find the same 51.75-value where it hangs. Sorry. :roll: :oops:
|
Quote:
Thanks :!: Priority #1 to fix today Stay tuned :!: -kwag |
Here it is. www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-1.0b3.exe
Please try it again :!: I believe that if you start with the CQ that always continued to loop from the start, that's the actual CQ to encode, because it's within the precision boundaries. But :imstupid: was running another iteration, instead of exiting at that point :imstupid: I can't test it, because I haven't seen that condition in my encodes 8O So please give us feedback :!: -kwag |
Quote:
Doing a test right now. Second CQ is 57.24, third 55.86...56.18...final 56.18. Have a beer, Kwag :drink: Well, i have to double-check the new CQ. Its a bit higher than before (56.18 instead of 51.01). Maybe its more accurate now 8) . Thanks Kwag :!: |
Quote:
I'll post BETA 3 now :) I think that bug was totally squashed ;) -kwag |
Quote:
It was coming back when encoding a long movie (not the one i encoded previously :evil: . Maybe this has something to do with start-CQ of 60 or with PAL :?: EDIT: This time Difference in log doesn't stay at the same value with the same CQ, it varies a little bit. |
Quote:
With BETA 3 :?: |
Quote:
|
|
Is it normal that one prediction cycle is taking almost 20 minutes to complete? This with a 140 min. movie. It's going real slooooow....
Using the same script in ToK only takes 3-4 minutes on the first cycle. This with a XP 2500 Barton. (Just upgraded) |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2026 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2026 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.