Quote:
|
took now a 53 min, wanted it to have it (for tests) on 300mb ;
calculated avg bitrate , with 631. here the log using cq 60 encoder started... encoder end... difference=-5439988.500000 using cq 90 encoder started encoder end differnce=-5439988.500000 cq above watermark , cq set to 90 using cq 90 cqmatic complete hmm strange :) |
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
-kwag |
?
don´t know exactly what you mean ? when i hit start he starts encoding ... got another test running now, so can´t do another one... what i wanted to say : cqmatic is getting information on cdsize, nr of cds...about the average bitrate , i think? so why does it take cq 90 , when i like to have the movie on 300mb ? but thats not the most important thing,its more important that it runs stable, finds the cq as fast as possible, so that everybody can use it :) |
Kwag, tigger , please:
i have doubts ... tigger wrote: "took now a 53 min, wanted it to have it (for tests) on 300mb ; calculated avg bitrate , with 631." this size (300mb) is not too low for 53 minutes? and the average is not too low? :? maybe i misunderstand....seems strange for me! :? |
you´re right of course, would never do that :)
but for 1 test, i chose such values... i thougt that cqmatic would calqulate the cq very low...perhaps 20-30 as cq or sth, but it chose 90 and thats strange for me :) |
Quote:
Source was 104 min. 576 x 304 PAL AVI movie. Using the same script for both tests, and destination was MPEG2 - 480 x 576 PAL. One prediction cycle with CQMatic took 16 min 40 sec, with a source range of 1 min 39 sec. One prediction cycle with ToK took 6 min 17 sec, with a source range of 1 min 44 sec. I have checked the project file over and over again, and as far as I can see, everything looks ok. This really puzzles me.... |
Quote:
This WILL be fixed today on BETA 8 :!: as I'm duplicating the problem now. Until later today, no more BETAS :!: -kwag |
If somebody want beta 7 here the right link:
http://www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-1.0b7.exe Kwag forgot the "-" ... |
Quote:
|
|
hope beta8 will be there soon :)
|
Kwag I'm still getting CQ prediction loops with beta 7. It starts at CQ 60, then 50.25, 40.83, 40.66, 40.57, 40.53, 40.51, 40.50, 40.50, 40.49...
And that's where it gets stuck. The value for Difference = also doesn't change. It also SEEMS like prediction samples take a longer time to encode than with ToK, but I haven't done a direct comparison. I'm encoding a widescreen avi, 640x272, 152 min long, avg bitrate 608, into a KVCDx3. |
avg 608 @ KVCDx3???
Is the quality still good at these settings? |
Oh... CQMatic calculated CQ is wrong... I want to encode a 100 min movie... but the CQ is 100MB too big... :cry:
|
Quote:
post big details.... wanted size,CQ found,average,etc. :) |
Quote:
-kwag |
Quote:
Only final prediction accuracy tweaks "might" be needed :cool: Here's the link, in case some of you haven't noticed it: www.kvcd.net/cqmatic-1.0RC1.exe -kwag |
Hello Kwag:
Cqmatic is now working for me. The video stream error message that I was receiving, as well as the strehed screen, were corrected following krassis and your answer to previous posts. On Cqmatic v6 I was seeing up to 2 hours of CQ checking, prior to encoding. I am presently running v RC-1, and so far is in its third pass. It takes about 12 minutes per pass, for an 80 minutes dvd. Will let you know how many passes it takes prior to the actual encoding, which in this oicture is about 13.5 hours..... Question: What is the shortest film, in minutes, that can I test with no problems? On previous versions I have used 4 minutes, but Moviestacker was given me erroneous numbers for the average kbs. ( anywhere from 8,000 to over 240,000- Theshortest the film, the higher the number. Obviously I am doing something wrong here, perhaps I should do this manually no?) Thanks again for your help Totonho03 |
Site design, images and content © 2002-2024 The Digital FAQ, www.digitalFAQ.com
Forum Software by vBulletin · Copyright © 2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.