Quantcast digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] - Search Results
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Ask Question   FAQ     Today's Posts
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Showing results 1 to 25 of 28
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: muaddib
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-23-2002, 09:35 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
:?: what's happen my friend? 8O[/quote] Too...

:?: what's happen my friend? 8O[/quote]

Too much beer :?: :roll:[/quote]

or the beer is over?
8O :lol:[/quote]

8O 8O 8O
Hey! Beer can NEVER be over!!!!!
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-23-2002, 01:40 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
No I don't :!: . I've never seen it :o ...

No I don't :!: . I've never seen it :o

-kwag[/quote]

Anyway I can't wait any longer.
I have to sleep a little.
See you all tomorrow. :D
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-23-2002, 01:33 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
:lol: :lol: :lol: Do you know how long is...

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Do you know how long is American Pie movie? :wink:
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-23-2002, 01:31 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
From what I can gather from that Dolby document,...

From what I can gather from that Dolby document, they also differ in that ProLogic needs to be specially encoded, whereas ProLogic II doesn't. They must have some damn clever people there.[/quote]
...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-23-2002, 12:49 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Well, I was talking about 3/2 prologic II! So...

Well, I was talking about 3/2 prologic II! So they sure have rear stereo separation. That's exactly what differs prologic and prologic II (the rear stereo separation).
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-23-2002, 12:24 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Well, as 5.1 Dolby Digital is a discrete system...

Well, as 5.1 Dolby Digital is a discrete system that keeps the multiple channels fully separated, I think that what we (headac3he) are doing is to encode a 3/2 Prologic II from a 5.1 Dolby Digital....
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 11:56 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
8O 8O 8O 8O Now you are answering question...

8O 8O 8O 8O
Now you are answering question before I ask them!!!!

edit: it is just missing DTS... :wink:
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 11:55 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
I would like to know the difference between...

I would like to know the difference between Pro-Logic, Pro-Logic II, Dolby Digital, and DTS...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 11:46 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
I think that too...

I think that too...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 11:44 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Yes, I know that 5.1 is better, but we can't have...

Yes, I know that 5.1 is better, but we can't have 5.1 with .mp2, can we?
So, if my DVD has both 5.1 and 3/2... Which should I choose to convert to mp2 with surround 2 downmix?
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 11:35 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Are you saying that a 3/2 channel is better for...

Are you saying that a 3/2 channel is better for mp2 than 5.1 channel?
It is something that I always feel… but never knew. :mrgreen:
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 12:46 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
8O Don't do that! 8O We need you right here!...

8O Don't do that! 8O
We need you right here! :D
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 12:41 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Yep! Right on target! :D And I just thought...

Yep! Right on target! :D

And I just thought that this "supposed" missing frame would be the "information" frame that we talk on the other thread. :mrgreen:
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 12:05 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
But I think that we should start to use the...

But I think that we should start to use the Sampler from SansGrip.
It IS more accurate.
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 12:01 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Yep... they are both the same, and are both...

Yep... they are both the same, and are both wrong. :wink: :D

If you use IL=107 (your red planet example) and SL=24, them you are getting 24 frames of every 107!! This would result in an HUGE...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 11:51 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
And more accurate to! :wink: For my test...

And more accurate to! :wink:

For my test I'm using an 86min film, so I'm using an 86:24 sample.
The sample with Sampler has 2063 frames, and the sample with avs has 2087. The exact value should...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 10:55 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Re: Sampler?

:lol: We posted at the same time Racer99.

Try this and you'll get what you want:
MI = (Framecount/Framerate)/60
IL = round(Framecount/MI)
SL = round(Framerate)
SelectRangeEvery(IL,SL)
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 10:51 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Hi Kwag, I believe that it's not right. ...

Hi Kwag,

I believe that it's not right.
Remember... IL = Interval Length, not the quantity of samples.
If you want the number of samples to be equal the movie time in minutes, you have to do...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 09:42 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
It's ok... I got it. :D It would be easier to...

It's ok... I got it. :D
It would be easier to understand if it was:
MPEG size = ((Total frames/Framerate)/MovieTimeInMinutes) * (sample file size * .98 )

Or even easier (just for my...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 08:55 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Wow, that's weird... Total...

Wow, that's weird... Total frames/MovieTimeInMinutes? Can you explain it a little bit?
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 02:48 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Come on guys, give us something... I have a...

Come on guys, give us something...
I have a movie here that is willing to be predicted! :D
What should I use?
I made some samples with these strange settings (512:6, 128:24, 25:96) and all came...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-22-2002, 01:33 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Hey! Of course we are tracking it! Well, at...

Hey! Of course we are tracking it!
Well, at least we are trying... :wink:
Just hope that you guys don't get lost in the middle of all this variation of granularity and window/sample length. :D
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-21-2002, 06:55 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
The file prediction formula must have changed: ...

The file prediction formula must have changed:

Old = ((movie length / 100) * (test file size * .95)) = Total Video file Size

New = ((movie lenght / 256) * (test file size * .98 )) = Total Video...
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-21-2002, 06:44 PM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
Yep... I think that you are right. LancosResize...

Yep... I think that you are right.
LancosResize gives more sharpness, and that increase the file size.
Forum: Video Encoding and Conversion 12-20-2002, 01:27 AM
Replies: 462
Views: 27,820
Posted By muaddib
I would love to stay and see the results! But...

I would love to stay and see the results!
But it's 4:20am and it's the second time my wife gets in here... you could guess her temper... :x
So, I’m going to sleep.
Hope that tomorrow I'll read...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 28
Page 1 of 2 1 2

 

 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Top of Page  -  Site Home  -  Forum Home  -  Archive  -  Forum Policies