Quantcast Ultra power zoom digicams that can shoot .tiff? - digitalFAQ Forum
  #1  
06-19-2009, 10:24 PM
Sossity Sossity is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 434
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
In light of my sony camera problem, if I cannot get it fixed, I will have to get myself another camera, I have liked the ultra /power zoom cameras, because I do not have to carry around bulky removable lenses that DSLRs have, & I also like to shoot video, so the power zoom allowed me to have both in one product, where as a DSLR does not shoot video & I would have to lug around 2 different items for the these purposes.

If I get another power zoom, in I mean a digicam with a 10x or bigger optical zoom, I would like one that can shoot .tiffs & raw files as well as .jpgs, I shoot photos of my artwork & need something of reasonable quality. For artwork or other important items I need good documentary photos, I have used my film SLR & shot slides, & scanned the slides for .tiffs, but it would be nice to have a camera that could shoot better quality than just .jpgs.

Added to all this I am on a budget & cannot afford a $1000 + DSLR kit right now.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
06-22-2009, 11:07 AM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff | Web Development
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,341
Thanked 610 Times in 447 Posts
What is the maximum budget you have available to work with?

Would you be interested in a DSLR, if you only needed one lens? In essence, that would be the same as an advanced point-and-shoot.

- Did this site help you? Then upgrade to Premium Member and show your support!
- Also: Like Us on Facebook for special DVD/Blu-ray news and deals!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
06-22-2009, 05:29 PM
Sossity Sossity is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 434
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by admin View Post
What is the maximum budget you have available to work with?

Would you be interested in a DSLR, if you only needed one lens? In essence, that would be the same as an advanced point-and-shoot.
yes I would, but I dont have thousands of dollars to buy one, is it possible to get a good DSLR for under $800.00? I have seen the pentax K2000, I like its .dng universal format & use of AA batteries, I prefer AA batteries. I also have a film SLR with a Sears label, no name brand with a K mount & I learned pentax uses K mount lenses. It would be used mostly at home for things like artwork, but also wildlife,action low light/night shots too.

Does canon or Nikon make a AA battery DSLR? or a DSLR for my needs with a lens & body kit for under $800.00?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
06-30-2009, 01:32 AM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff | Web Development
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,341
Thanked 610 Times in 447 Posts
The budget of $800 is plenty -- in fact, it may be more than is needed. I'm currently hunting down some deals for you, as well as assembling a really nice "to buy" list, for one option you can look at. With a "grip", you can use AA batteries -- I do it too, when my rechargeables die on me, and I don't have time to recharge. While I use a much higher-end camera, with a budget of $800, you'll still walk away with a really nice DSLR setup. The Pentax DSLRs are nice, but with your budget, you can do better, not a problem. It's taken a few days to reply, but I've had this on my mind between other tasks.

With the sub-$800 DSLR setup I have in mind, you can take MUCH BETTER QUALITY still images, but video is not available. is that a deal breaker? If so, I'll have to look into advanced P&S options. I only re-visit the no-video option because of your mention of the Pentax, which also lacks video. In all honesty, even with a $2,000+ DSLR, you'll never get a really good video+still shooting experience. The best still images will come from a DSLR because of how the sensor and glass is made, whereas video can range from VHS-like decent quality on the most modern P&S (canon and Sony, for example) for $100-150 range, up to edit-quality from a sub-compact DV or even HD/AVCHD cameras.

I currently shoot a D200, and I was going to hunt down a great deal on a nice zoom (18-135 range) and a lower-end body such as D40, D40x or D60. I get a lot of e-mails from camera companies wanting to advertise, just need to browse through the current week's available sales/coupons/deals. So yes, Nikon was where I would look first. I'd give Canon a browse too, but I'm not too fond of their lower-end DSLR bodies (plastic and sometimes flimsy).

- Did this site help you? Then upgrade to Premium Member and show your support!
- Also: Like Us on Facebook for special DVD/Blu-ray news and deals!
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DVDO iScan Ultra Home cinema Video Processor review ? deter Capture, Record, Transfer 2 12-30-2011 01:08 PM
You shoot, they process - pilotimaging.com kpmedia Photo Processing, Scanning & Printing 2 07-05-2010 03:37 AM
Tutorial videos with zoom effect admin Encode, Convert for streaming 0 06-21-2010 03:31 AM
Point and shoot that takes the picture really fast ? admin Photo Cameras: Buying & Shooting 1 09-13-2009 01:58 PM
Best point-and-shoot camera on my list? admin Photo Cameras: Buying & Shooting 2 09-04-2009 11:14 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM