Quantcast Errors on the edges of converted VHS tapes? - digitalFAQ.com Support Forum
Go Back   digitalFAQ.com Support Forum > Digital Video > DVD Project Help > Capture, Record, Transfer

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
11-15-2008, 09:38 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff / Media Project and Technical Adviser
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,890
Thanks: 109
Thanked 405 Times in 353 Posts
There's been some concern lately from a few folks, both customers and otherwise, regarding "tracking noise" and "odd edges" on VHS tapes that they (or I) have converted. So I wanted to address this issue, shed some light on what it is, what means, and how it can be removed (if required).

The issue is that of "overscan" on an analog signal. Some of this has been explained on the site, currently located on this page, but I want to re-explain it again, a little differently.

Let us begin...

Analog video is a very chaotic mechanism, compared to the relatively variable-free or variable-controlled digital realm. Once upon a time, some many decades ago, broadcasters and television makers decided that it was acceptable to have noise in the video signal.

For example: (You must be logged in as a Free Member or Premium Member to view images and download attachments.)

You must be logged in to view this content; either login or register for the forum. The attached screen shots, before/after images, photos and graphics are created/posted for the benefit of site members. And you are invited to join our digital media community.


Notice the errors on all sides of the image. These were present on the original video tape. It's a mix of closed-caption noise, head-switching noise, and a simple lack of image for the black areas. Processing the tape through a proc amp (a device that can tweak and improve color, contrast and brightness) has added more errors to the edges, because it also does not cover 100% of the image, just most of it. The proc amp boundaries, an Elite BVP-4 Plus in this case, made nasty rainbow effects and added a hard border just a few pixels off the left and right screen edges.

What is seen on a television set is maybe 93% (on average) of the image, starting from the center. The outer edges are never seen aside from special monitors designed to show edge-to-edge information. There have been a few cheaply-made HDTV sets that show the overscan area, but it is a small minority, mostly confined to early-version screens. A good television, be it traditional, SDTV, EDTV or HDTV, will properly crop down your image.

If you really, really want to hide this noise, because you or somebody else is likely to view it on an edge-to-edge device (most likely a computer screen), then yes, it can be masked in most video editors and some video encoders. TMPGEnc Plus, Adobe Premiere, VirtualDub and Sony Vegas Video come to mind. Note that I said "mask" and not "crop". Rarely would you want to chop off part of your image, covering it over with black is the best option. Just cover it enough to hide what is bad. If you cover too much, the black borders may shown on screen!

You would only crop if the video is not intended for tv anymore, such as uploading to Youtube, or for other web-style distribution.

This is what a mask would look like. Please note that I've masked about 7% of the image, just to show what the entire overscan area would look like, in comparison to the edge-to-edge data.

You must be logged in to view this content; either login or register for the forum. The attached screen shots, before/after images, photos and graphics are created/posted for the benefit of site members. And you are invited to join our digital media community.


This is the real image that was shot in the consumer camera, or created in the professional editor (and displayed on your television). It was created knowing that the excess edge data would never be shown - or so they thought. Few folks could have foreseen the way digital video and computers have developed so fast, and become so mainstream. It wasn't too many years ago that folks like Bill Gates were telling us that computers wouldn't need to go faster or have more memory, it was "more than anybody would ever need".

This is what you'll see on your tv screen:

You must be logged in to view this content; either login or register for the forum. The attached screen shots, before/after images, photos and graphics are created/posted for the benefit of site members. And you are invited to join our digital media community.


Was fixing the image worth adding more noise to the edge area? You bet! Just check out how bad the original image was, before the proc amp improved it:

You must be logged in to view this content; either login or register for the forum. The attached screen shots, before/after images, photos and graphics are created/posted for the benefit of site members. And you are invited to join our digital media community.


Hopefully this will explain what you're seeing, and put aside any concerns. I would imagine the only aspect not covered here is software-specific methods to mask, should it really be needed.


__________________
If this site has been as helpful as a book or magazine, then donate a few dollars or consider upgrading your membership.
Don't forget to Like Us on Facebook or Follow Us on Twitter for special news and deals. Thanks!
You must be logged in to view images and download attachments.
Reply With Quote


Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help Ep Tapes Pepeart Home Entertainment and Videography 3 07-25-2006 03:17 AM
Audio video sync errors 777sp2 Capture, Record, Transfer 9 11-18-2005 03:33 PM
Voltage Errors - Pioneer DVD-r tobal2 Computers 4 08-29-2005 03:32 PM
Virtual Memory errors when authoring tobal2 Computers 3 08-16-2005 12:52 PM
DVD Burning Errors, Cyclic Redundancy Check and burning freezes rmehta2 Copy DVDs, Duplicate, Replicate 7 07-13-2005 12:34 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM  —  vBulletin Copyright © 2011 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd  —  SEO by vBSEO