Quantcast Avisynth: Which one is Better, Normal or Motion Adaptive? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Avisynth Scripting

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
09-07-2003, 12:50 AM
CheronAph CheronAph is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to CheronAph
So, which one is better normal or motion adaptive?
And another question, dvd2avi says my source is interlaced, what does it mean and do I have to do something to it?

And hello to all, long time no seeing!
__________________
¨¨°º©©º°¨¨°º©CHERONAPH©º°¨¨°º©©º°¨¨
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
09-07-2003, 08:01 AM
Dialhot Dialhot is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Motion adaptative is always better on DVD sources.
For Divx we use an other static script that is not reported there but in the AVI/MPEG4 forum (according to forum rules).
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avisynth: Motion adaptive? tengo6dedos Avisynth Scripting 3 07-08-2008 02:59 PM
Avisynth: Help with Linear Motion Adaptive Filtering pitoman Avisynth Scripting 2 08-05-2003 12:51 PM
Avisynth: Motion adaptive green? CheronAph Avisynth Scripting 24 06-25-2003 01:17 AM
Avisynth: Motion adaptive filtering now possible? sbin Avisynth Scripting 494 06-13-2003 06:43 PM
Avisynth: Motion Adaptive Asharp? ovg64 Avisynth Scripting 0 06-07-2003 04:07 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd