04-27-2004, 04:31 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
hello, I have read all the thread written from incredible:
I have created a avi of 30m in order making of the tests.
I have used:
slicer (2,15,0,2,1) for ping
slicer (2,15,30,2,1) for pong
with ping I have 4274 kb
with pong I have 4358 kb
medium value is of 4316 kb
previewed filesize 4311*100/2 = 215,800 kb
final resulting has been of 196.172 kb (less of the 9,09 %).
I would want to know if all this is right and that precision has the method ping-pong.
thanks
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
04-27-2004, 05:10 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
medium value is of 4316 kb
previewed filesize 4311*100/2 = 215,800 kb
final resulting has been of 196.172 kb (less of the 9,09 %).
|
Maybe I cant follow but ...
In your case 4316kb would end in 215800 kb, ok ... how do you come to 4311?
Maybe you should try:
Ping : Slicer(2,15,05,2,0)
Pong: Slicer(2,15,30,2,0)
As by this you can avoid predictionning the first 5 Mins where almost every Movie in its "intro" got very much dark.
Maybe even Ping-Pong did not catch a very dynamic scene in your movie, ... so you can assume what would happen if you would have predicted the "regular" way
|
04-27-2004, 05:11 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Palma de Mallorca - España
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Your difference in 800 MB file, it woul be about 60MB. It is to much difference.
Do you run a safe ping test?
Could you run ping pong prediction with slicer function Prodater64Mod (look at end of the pingpong thread) and compare with your results?
|
04-28-2004, 03:26 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@prodator64
I would want to understand the incredible method's and then using your modified ruotine, otherwise I risk not to understand nothing.
@incredible
you can explain in way simple and schematic all the passages to me in order to apply your method?
thanks
|
05-04-2004, 03:13 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
hello incredible, I would want to know some things:
1. If I use a percentage of 5% instead of 2% for the prediction, I will have a best prediction?
2. the recommendation in order to find the offset one to parity of gop and gl depends by sa, that is if I use 5% offset will be always 12, right?
3. You can tell me, large way, that error percentage you have, as an example
I have: sampler(15) ---> 6025 kb
previewed Kb 602500
real Kb 551399 kb
error with normal prediction (+8,48%)
error with ping pong (2%): (+4,11%)
error with ping pong (5%): (+2,43%)
are in the average?
by
|
05-04-2004, 04:40 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
1) if using 5% at ping-pong you in real do predict 10%!! of the movie as you do predict using 2 offsets ... means for example 05 and 35.
A prediction using ping pong of 2% is TOTALLY enough
2) Quote:
the recommendation in order to find the offset one to parity of gop and gl depends by sa, that is if I use 5% offset will be always 12, right?
|
Waht do you mean?? I didnt understand.
The internal calculator does its calcualtion in a way that the samples of the 2nd offset (pong) always will be almost in the middle between the ping samples (see my green graphic in the link of the "long-short vs. ping pong" thread)
3) Again I didn't understand.
I do always use 2% and sometimes a gl of 1 and sometimes a gl of 2 , so try a goplenght multiplicator (gl) of just 1 (offset decreases automatically) and tell me what results.
As told I got everytime about 98% acuracy.
|
05-08-2004, 01:45 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
then, my objective is this:
to make the prevision for 5 films together:
using the normal method (that is sampler(lenght=15)) I get a total prevision regarding the real value of the +4,54%
using your method with
slicer(2,15,00,1,0) for the ping and
slicer(2,15,15,1,0) for the pong
I get the prevision of the +5.91% regarding the real value.
I use like encoder cce.
where's the mistake?
|
05-08-2004, 03:06 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
then, my objective is this:
to make the prevision for 5 films together:
using the normal method (that is sampler(lenght=15)) I get a total prevision regarding the real value of the +4,54%
using your method with
slicer(2,15,00,1,0) for the ping and
slicer(2,15,15,1,0) for the pong
I get the prevision of the +5.91% regarding the real value.
I use like encoder cce.
where's the mistake?
|
Means?
Do you say "Sampler(15) does it better or what?
Because as seen above slicer(2, 15,00,1,0) does also sample eoth a sample length of 15!
Maybe you should try using slicer(2,15,00, 2,0)
And therefore the higher Offset in Pong i.E. slicer(2,15, 35,2,0)
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|