10-14-2005, 10:12 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
The only problem when switching will be no more support via calcumatic i.e. - if its still used.
.... so Karrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl. Keep Calcumatic up-to-date by taking in the evening a glass of wine and apply some lines to the code so dgindex outputted d2v's will be supported.
If you dont have time and if I can help you .... just rrrrring da bell.
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
10-14-2005, 10:56 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dialhot
The mode are : Honor pulldown, Ignore pulldown and Force film.
The mode to use is still Force film.
Note: there is a very good manual delivered now.
|
 Thanks, Phil.  Typing from memory.  Will get manual.
|
10-14-2005, 11:15 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
The only problem when switching will be no more support via calcumatic i.e. - if its still used.
.... so Karrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl. Keep Calcumatic up-to-date by taking in the evening a glass of wine and apply some lines to the code so dgindex outputted d2v's will be supported.
If you dont have time and if I can help you .... just rrrrring da bell.
|
LOL
He's just been too damn busy to look into the code and make calcumatic compatible with dgindex  .
But I agree that this would be the right timing to do it  .
Cheers
__________________
Rui
|
10-15-2005, 01:13 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rds_correia
He's just been too damn busy to look into the code and make calcumatic compatible with dgindex  .
|
Yes I have
And it won't be this week end, for sure
-kwag
|
10-15-2005, 04:33 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ok, we'll wait then  .
__________________
Rui
|
10-24-2005, 05:09 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
New release,
watch the changelog in the announcement thread.
|
10-24-2005, 05:47 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Looks amazing.
|
10-24-2005, 06:18 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
10-24-2005, 08:25 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brasil
Posts: 538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@Incredible
It's really a major upgrade
Keep up the excelent work!
Kudos,
|
10-24-2005, 08:41 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Palma de Mallorca - España
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Incredible, Incredible.
|
10-25-2005, 05:33 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
First little "cosmetic" bug : in the "show/preview/Safe script". It is "sa ve". The same for the button name.
Thanks
Edit: I add an other bug. "F3" answers that there is no source loaded, even if there is one.
|
10-25-2005, 05:38 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lahti, Finland
Posts: 1,652
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
And "shure" should be "sure"
Thanks for the new version, I'll try it on my next capture today
|
10-25-2005, 06:35 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Donkeyland
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Incredible,
How is the resizing from NTSC to PAL......and PAL to NTSC handled ???
Also is there a brief manual available for the options yet ???
|
10-25-2005, 08:12 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Spelling related issues will be surely fixed
a) @Phil
So only via HotKey that issue is present? Not via Pulldown choice?
b) @Boulder
I got in mind this morning that the active µs which differ from standard will only be taken into account when avi-captures are the input, so in your case as you feed DgIndex with your PVR captures, that should also be an option in case of d2v-inputs.
c) @Supermule
How is it handled? Also like all other calcs, means respecting the active µs and source PAR. mpeg4 inputs will be recognised as std. 52.000µs (no matter if PAL or NTSC as these do differ minimal which would be compensated anyway as a MOD based output will be the result.
BUT! NTSC will be treaten as active 480 height, means 525/60Hz "cropped", as full active NTSC is 648x468 ... means in case of PAL-->NTSC the image should be a bit "bigger" in a whole (factor 468/480) and vice versa at NTSC-->PAL.
Look here (thats the source reference of PARanoia):
http://www.uwasa.fi/~f76998/video/co...nversion_table
Converting between Formats:
Look at Point 4.6 in the link
Means the PAR and ARs will result full ok, just the imagesize differs by a factor of 468/480
|
10-25-2005, 08:31 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Donkeyland
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
@Supermule
Look here (thats the source reference of PARanoia):
http://www.uwasa.fi/~f76998/video/co...nversion_table
Converting between Formats:
Look at Point 4.6 in the link
Means the PAR and ARs will result full ok, just the imagesize differs by a factor of 468/480
|
Well, coincidently that links also the source for my information, but sometimes I wonder how much would a good or bad PAR(within limits) effect the naked eye viewability of a commoner llike me!!!!  .
But let me tell you, its a commendable piece of code you have written  .
|
10-25-2005, 10:22 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
a) @Phil
So only via HotKey that issue is present? Not via Pulldown choice?
|
Fortunally, the menu works correctly. Only the hotkey fails.
I don't understand fully the difference between the two options in the "non-ITU" settings.
|
10-25-2005, 10:36 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lahti, Finland
Posts: 1,652
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
b) @Boulder
I got in mind this morning that the active µs which differ from standard will only be taken into account when avi-captures are the input, so in your case as you feed DgIndex with your PVR captures, that should also be an option in case of d2v-inputs.
|
Ah, I don't have the PVR anymore as I got me a second-hand Hauppauge card with BT878 chipset some time ago.
Feeding a 696x576 PicVideo MJPEG capture I get this:
I think it would be better to leave the video as it is or bob it instead of separating the fields. Also, the video length is incorrect - PARanoia shows 9368 frames as the length but the clip is 38113 frames long.
|
10-25-2005, 05:39 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thats odd!
First there is NO routine applied when whatching the preview in the MainWindow (not avs window)!
Internally a simple API vfw call is used to receive the video informations and playback of an AVI file.
Hmmm .... I did test some picvideo avi captures and length and size in the prew.Window are ok ...
EDIT: Well the problem of the preview Main Window results of an uncommon 696 width! The purpose was to correct avis when using std. widths like 704 or 720, 544,528,480 etc, and not already fixed ones in their width
|
10-26-2005, 12:59 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lahti, Finland
Posts: 1,652
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
EDIT: Well the problem of the preview Main Window results of an uncommon 696 width! The purpose was to correct avis when using std. widths like 704 or 720, 544,528,480 etc, and not already fixed ones in their width 
|
I use 696x576 because that's the closest resolution to the actual sample rate, BT878 chip and Hauppauge's drivers. Anything above it is scaled.
|
10-26-2005, 02:33 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Yep I know .. 51.560µs
I think Ill have to rewrite the import parsing routine.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|