Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Because for SVCD you must encode 23.976 and use 3:2 pulldown. SVCD doesn't support encoding directly at 23.976 without pulldown.
|
Well technically SVCD doesn't support any resolutions other than 480x480 either
I've encoded many an SVCD directly at 23.976 with no problems with encoding or playback.
What we're creating here are X(S)VCD's, which are non-standard..
So what would be the technical drawbacks to encoding to Interlaced vs. Progressive, or vice-versa, or encoding to 23.976 w/ or w/out pulldown.. that's my question..
I've done a few tests, and the only differences I've found so far is a smaller size with Interlaced (though it looks like garbage), and a much larger file when doing 3:2 pulldown.