Quantcast TMPGEnc: Interlaced vs. Non-Interlaced? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
12-21-2002, 10:43 PM
gonzopdx gonzopdx is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just a quick question:

When encoding to MPEG2 (SVCD), which should be used? Interlaced or Non-Interlaced? What are the differences in the resulting MPEG? Any difference in size?

Thanks..

-gonzo
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
12-21-2002, 10:55 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If your target is SVCD, you don't need to de-interlace. That's an advantage of SVCD over standard VCD. So if your source is interlaced, you just encode without any de-interlacing. If your source is progressive FILM, then you encode at 23.976fps with 3:2 pulldown enabled. This way you keep the original frame rate, and your SVCD will look better than if you encode at 29.97fps.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
12-21-2002, 11:09 PM
gonzopdx gonzopdx is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I usually do an IVTC if it's Telecined before I encode it, thus encoding at a steady 23.976. My question is the differences between doing a Progressive encode (Non-Interlaced) vs. Interlaced encode for the actual target MPEG..

If, for example, my source is FILM (23.976), I should then encode at 23.976 with 3:2 pulldown enabled (thus making it 29.97)? Why not just encode at 23.976 Interlaced..?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
12-21-2002, 11:15 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by grivad
I usually do an IVTC if it's Telecined before I encode it, thus encoding at a steady 23.976. My question is the differences between doing a Progressive encode (Non-Interlaced) vs. Interlaced encode for the actual target MPEG..

If, for example, my source is FILM (23.976), I should then encode at 23.976 with 3:2 pulldown enabled (thus making it 29.97)? Why not just encode at 23.976 Interlaced..?
Because for SVCD you must encode 23.976 and use 3:2 pulldown. SVCD doesn't support encoding directly at 23.976 without pulldown. VCD does.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #5  
12-22-2002, 12:03 AM
gonzopdx gonzopdx is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Because for SVCD you must encode 23.976 and use 3:2 pulldown. SVCD doesn't support encoding directly at 23.976 without pulldown.
Well technically SVCD doesn't support any resolutions other than 480x480 either I've encoded many an SVCD directly at 23.976 with no problems with encoding or playback.

What we're creating here are X(S)VCD's, which are non-standard..

So what would be the technical drawbacks to encoding to Interlaced vs. Progressive, or vice-versa, or encoding to 23.976 w/ or w/out pulldown.. that's my question..

I've done a few tests, and the only differences I've found so far is a smaller size with Interlaced (though it looks like garbage), and a much larger file when doing 3:2 pulldown.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
12-22-2002, 12:47 AM
SansGrip SansGrip is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by grivad
So what would be the technical drawbacks to encoding to Interlaced vs. Progressive, or vice-versa, or encoding to 23.976 w/ or w/out pulldown.. that's my question..
Interlaced material will be at 29.97fps, which is 20% more than progressive NTSC film. The only time I would say stick with interlaced is if you're encoding from a non-telecined source such as a TV cap.

A DVD player should be able to do the telecine internally if the correct flag is set in the SVCD header. At least, that's my understanding from other posts. I don't make SVCDs since my standalone won't play them .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
12-22-2002, 01:01 AM
gonzopdx gonzopdx is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SansGrip
Interlaced material will be at 29.97fps
Ahh yes, this makes perfect sense. I didn't even think of that

Thanks!

-gonzo
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TMPGEnc: Field order for interlaced source mistermickster Video Encoding and Conversion 6 12-12-2003 11:49 AM
TMPGENc: way of finding out if an mpeg or avi is interlaced? ftin Video Encoding and Conversion 1 07-16-2003 10:08 AM
TMPGEnc: What frame rate for interlaced file? syk2c11 Video Encoding and Conversion 7 02-12-2003 06:11 AM
TMPGEnc: 23.976fps interlaced 2COOL Video Encoding and Conversion 0 11-10-2002 04:35 PM
with TMPgenc, the output is interlaced? twobit326 Video Encoding and Conversion 2 10-16-2002 07:36 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd