Quantcast Suggestion for DVD Filters? - Page 3 - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
Go Back    digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives] > Video Production Forums > Video Encoding and Conversion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #41  
05-19-2003, 10:41 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk2c11
Hi Kwag,
Are those latest scripts suitable for KDVD full-D1, I remember you had said that KDVD full-D1 does not required that heavy filtering. Please advise.
For KDVD Full D-1, I would drop the mergeluma WAY down to 0.1 or even 0.05
Leave the mergechroma set at 1.5
You might want to drop the unsharp line completely, because you're already at a very high 720x480(576) resolution

-kwag
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #42  
06-05-2003, 07:45 AM
ezysk ezysk is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 197
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm curious to know what all these "filters" are suppose to do. Is there any filter for resolving "pixelation" distortions during action sequences and rapid camera panning ???
Reply With Quote
  #43  
06-12-2003, 02:15 PM
High Speed Dubb High Speed Dubb is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi all,
I’ve taken a look at the video segment. The problem is pretty straightforward — That segment is constantly in motion. The motion isn’t fast, but the speed of the motion isn’t at all important. With constant motion, Peach Smoother can’t ever get a noise estimate. More importantly — With constant motion throughout the picture, you really shouldn’t use a temporal smoother at all.

Without a noise estimate, Peach Smoother uses its default, which is meant for use with a noisy TV capture. On any clean source material, that’s going to cause lots and lots of blurring.

If any part of the scene were standing still, Peach would have a chance to get a decent noise estimate, and the problem would be avoided. So there are a couple ways to take care of this problem, both of which are covered in the docs. I’ll reprint the FAQ on this, since it’s pretty relevant:
Quote:
I’m seeing lots of blurring in early parts of my constant motion (or very dark) video. What should I do to improve the results?

If you’re seeing lots of blurring, try using the Dot option. If the green dot doesn’t show up, then the problem is that the Peach wasn’t able to figure out how much noise there was.

There are a couple ways to solve this. The best is to turn on the Readout option, and watch a later part of the video where the picture is still. Make a note of the NoiseLevel and Baseline from that stationary part. Then specify them in your command, and the whole sequence should look fine.

If your video doesn’t have any stationary parts, then you should just skip this filter. A temporal smoother isn’t going to do much good for pure high motion material.

Another way to solve this problem is to put some still video (from the same clip) at the beginning of the sequence. That will allow the Peach to estimate the noise before the fast stuff shows up.
Note that fiddling with Stability and NoiseReduction isn’t going to help for this — The problem lies with the noise estimation, not the noise/motion tradeoff.
__________________
Lindsey Dubb
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Usenet Suggestion kwag Computers 8 05-01-2006 02:15 PM
Suggestion - Statistics GFR Avisynth Scripting 16 11-12-2003 10:12 AM
Bitrates: Suggestion for CQMatic nicksteel Video Encoding and Conversion 0 08-08-2003 06:06 AM
Suggestion Gaudi Off-topic Lounge 0 01-04-2003 08:50 AM
Little suggestion andybno1 Off-topic Lounge 4 07-18-2002 09:33 PM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd