Quantcast KVCD: is it Worth Uisng Convolution3D and Dustv5? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
03-12-2003, 07:10 PM
Adder Adder is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi all

When encoding at 352x288 KVCD LBR, is it worth using convolution3d and dustv5 on top of temporalcleaner and temporalsmooter? i have 2 samples 1 with temporalcleaner and smoother only and 1 with convolution3d LQ and faery. From what i could see the sample using just temporalcleaner and temporalsmoother looked better.

Any opinions

thanks.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
03-12-2003, 07:21 PM
Kane Kane is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
well, i always use Covolution3D LQ and Spacedust and do not use temporalcleaner- and smoother with the lbr-kvcd template and get great results
__________________
greetz Kane
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
64k NTFS cluster size worth it for video processing? cweb Computers 5 05-03-2006 08:46 AM
DustV5.dll de Avshint 2.0..existe en 2.5?? generador Convertir y Codificar Video (Español) 2 04-23-2004 10:21 AM
Is it worth using filters on a movie? zaanvander Video Encoding and Conversion 5 03-16-2004 06:29 AM
KVCD: Is chopping of the credits worth it for extra quality? audi2honda Video Encoding and Conversion 1 06-16-2003 11:22 AM
KVCD: Convolution3d okay for avi encoding? heller Video Encoding and Conversion 4 02-28-2003 03:49 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd