05-04-2003, 04:24 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Simply, what resolution should I use for a source with a resolution of 576x240 PAL
//Wolfi
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
05-04-2003, 04:29 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
528/544x576
|
05-05-2003, 05:20 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I don't know if it is good idea. Usually I try to encode in such a way, that the encoded file has equall or less pixels for frame than the source. The reason - in the source file there is information for the pixels regarding the resolution. If one try to encode with the resolution, which require more pixels should expect decrease of quality as the information for the extra pixels don't exist at all. In the case - 576X240 = 138240 pixels. If the aspect ratio is 2.35:1 then 528 X 432 = 228096 pixels. I would suggest to encode with 352 X 288. You have 352 X 216 = 76032 pixels. The 432 and 216 values are only for the picture, the remain are black borders. I hope this make sense.
|
05-05-2003, 05:56 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Theoretically you're right Abond. However, I found out for myself, that upscaling with "BicubicResize" gives me excellent results. When you encode this with such a low resolution, I'm sure picture will look worse. However you should try out what best suits you
If you decide to upscale, use a precise BicubicResize.
__________________
j3llyG0053
|
05-05-2003, 09:44 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
so there is no good resolution in the middle of 352x288 and 528x576
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 09:58 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lahti, Finland
Posts: 1,652
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
352x576, CVD resolution. I use it from time to time.
|
05-05-2003, 10:10 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
In this case I prefere 352x240 .
Your source is 576x240 - just 240 lines . If u go to higher res I dont think u'll get better picture .
Go for 352x240 with highest CQ value with little sharpening u'll get best u can .
Want to be sure make small clips and compare
bman
|
05-05-2003, 10:16 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
SVCD or VCD, how will give me the best quality
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 10:24 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
U are using KVCD temlates right ?
So , quality u'll get even with 352x240 will be much higher than VCD - xVCD (KVCD).
If source is HQ than u can expect quality almoast SVCD .
bman
|
05-05-2003, 10:29 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bman
U are using KVCD temlates right ?
So , quality u'll get even with 352x240 will be much higher than VCD - xVCD (KVCD).
If source is HQ than u can expect quality almoast SVCD .
bman
|
But should I choose SVCD as MPEG strem type or VCD
EDIT: Why should'nt I have this resolution, 352x480
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 10:44 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I didn't say do not use 352x480 .
Just , try and see . Take same episode and encode it with 352x480 , 352x240 , 480x480 or even 704x480 if your player can support it and compare them . This test shoud take about half an hour but than u'll be sure in your choise .
Which stream svcd or vcd ??? I don't follow exectly what u mean !
Try to encode as mpeg1 as egreed that TMPGenc is best for it .
bman
|
05-05-2003, 10:57 AM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bman
I didn't say do not use 352x480 .
Just , try and see . Take same episode and encode it with 352x480 , 352x240 , 480x480 or even 704x480 if your player can support it and compare them . This test shoud take about half an hour but than u'll be sure in your choise .
Which stream svcd or vcd ??? I don't follow exectly what u mean !
Try to encode as mpeg1 as egreed that TMPGenc is best for it .
bman
|
excuse my ignorance:
704x480 is for ntsc?
ashamed thanks!
|
05-05-2003, 11:19 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 316
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
704x480 is for ntsc?
ashamed thanks!
|
Yes, 704x480 for NTSC, 704x576 for PAL.
-d&c
|
05-05-2003, 11:22 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bman
I didn't say do not use 352x480 .
Just , try and see . Take same episode and encode it with 352x480 , 352x240 , 480x480 or even 704x480 if your player can support it and compare them . This test shoud take about half an hour but than u'll be sure in your choise .
Which stream svcd or vcd ??? I don't follow exectly what u mean !
Try to encode as mpeg1 as egreed that TMPGenc is best for it .
bman
|
Ah, I mean witch stream type I should select in ToK
Is'nt also res. 480x480 NTSC
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 11:28 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Select VCD !
As your source is 576x240 I assumed that your source is 23.976fps and NTSC .
If I'm wrong than sorry ?!
bman
|
05-05-2003, 11:44 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bman
Select VCD !
As your source is 576x240 I assumed that your source is 23.976fps and NTSC .
If I'm wrong than sorry ?!
bman
|
576x240, 25.000 (PAL) :P So you mean 480x480 is NTSC
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 12:05 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
My source quality is actually very good so dont you think I should use a higher resolution then 352x288
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 12:24 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hey Wolfi, we can't do the job of trying out yourself for you
I'd say you can easily get away with 528x576 (PAL) if your player supports it, but upscale with BicubicResizer. However, opinions differ, so you just gotta try out what you like better...
__________________
j3llyG0053
|
05-05-2003, 12:39 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellygoose
Hey Wolfi, we can't do the job of trying out yourself for you
I'd say you can easily get away with 528x576 (PAL) if your player supports it, but upscale with BicubicResizer. However, opinions differ, so you just gotta try out what you like better...
|
Well it supports 544x480 NTSC so I suppose it will support 528x576 If I choose to encode with 528x576, should I select MPEG-2 or MPEG-1 as stream type in ToK
Using this script
ConvertToYUY2()
LegalClip()
GripCrop( width=xxx, height=xxx, overscan=0 )
GripSize(resizer="BicubicResize")
STMedianFilter(10, 30, 0, 0, 10, 30)
SpaceDust()
unfilter(50,50)
temporalsmoother(1,2)
mergechroma(blur(1.5 )
mergeluma(blur(0.3))
DctFilter(1,1,1,1,1,.5,.5,0)
GripBorders()
Letterbox(0,0,32,32)
LegalClip()
//Wolfi
|
05-05-2003, 12:58 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
If you live in a NTSC Zone, encode at 544x480 instead of 544x576. However, you overscan way to much at the end. Change the values to this: Letterbox(0,0,18,1 . The resolution is too low to overlap 32 pixel on each side.
Also lower the LumaBlur to 0.15 in this script, or the picture will get to soft.
__________________
j3llyG0053
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 PM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|