Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Wo
Oh wow I did not know that! I was fooling around a little trying to make my first KDVD from an xvid source (I know, I know, wrong forum!).
|
Quote:
If I don't bother to do file prediction, will a typical 2 hr movie fit fine on a DVD-R if I just set CQ to 90? Or will I still have to do prediction?
|
You should be able to fit 2 hours, with some room to spare at that CQ
Quote:
I used Moviestacker to load my source file and set the resolution to Full DVD in order to get the right GripCrop lines. Now with KVCD mpeg-1 I know there is a difference in destination anamorphic settings, i.e. should be ON for a widescreen tv and OFF for a normal TV. What about for KDVDs? Is there a setting I can use so it will look fine on both tv systems?
|
If your DVD is anamorphic, make sure you also check anamorphic on destination. This way, you'll create a DVD identical to your source.
Quote:
Also I have noticed much more discussion about using CCE in this forum than tmpgenc. I seem to recall hearing that CCE is better for mpeg-2 and faster. Is this the case, are most people using CCE for their KDVDs?
|
Well, you'll really gain a slight quality gain with CCE, and more encoding speed.
To me, I've done many KDVDs, and I'm very happy with TMPEG's quality on MPEG-2.
I've managed to put up to 3 movies (~ 2 hours each ) at 720x480 on one DVD-R, and they just look excelent.
Hint: If you don't care about anamorphic, and you want your movie just plain old 16:9, then don't check the anamorphic on output, and you'll save tons of bitrate, useable for higher quality, or more play time on your DVD-R
Just make a small test encode of your movie at CQ=90, and see how it looks
-kwag