05-07-2003, 11:53 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san jose, Ca
Posts: 1,148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Artificial Intelligence- I just saw this the other night- I liked it! Pretty good story I thought and good special effects too. That kid's a good actor. I started to laugh when I saw "Dr. Know" because someone around here had that avatar which I had though was Santa Claus
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
05-07-2003, 12:22 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Yeah, it's good but long.,I have a commercial VCD copy of it
|
05-07-2003, 12:23 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Yeah, that's a cool movie ( but loooong )
I wonder if it can fit on one CD, at least at 352x480
-kwag
|
05-07-2003, 12:24 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Beat me by microseconds telemike
|
05-07-2003, 01:19 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
The commercial VCD is 3 discs. Y'know, CBR 1150, yada yada.
Git it from www.eurekamovies.com when I first discovered VCD's.
|
05-07-2003, 02:05 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: T.O. (Da T-Dot)
Posts: 498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
a.1.
isnt that a steak sauce
|
05-07-2003, 02:42 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Started off nicely but it came very boring at the end, I have it on DVD!
__________________
¨¨°º©©º°¨¨°º©CHERONAPH©º°¨¨°º©©º°¨¨
|
05-07-2003, 03:25 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Boring!? Oh man... I think it's one of the most intense dramas that I ever saw.
I think it's a great great movie, and the end is just perfect!
See those most advanced robots searching for the human existence was cool!
And they (the future robots) were the only ones that really care for the suffering of the robo-boy.
They had much more "humanity" with the boy's feelings then any human in the movie.
I cry every time I watch this movie.
BTW, this was my very first movie encoded with KVCD!
Look here! Back to old times of CQ_VBR... it's almost an year now!
|
05-07-2003, 04:14 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
it was a good movie but the ending was kind of weird. its like the ending to hannibal. you don't really know if its part of the movie or some kind of strange dream sequence.
|
05-07-2003, 07:56 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
My honest opinion is that Spielberg went off track with A.I. I mean it's not a bad movie, but I think it woulda been a lot better had Kubrick lived long enough to make it himself. Here are the main problems I can see with it:
1) It's too long. By about 45 minutes.
2) Are we supposed to care about the boy's "mother"? I mean I know the kid's a robot, but would any non-psychopathic person really be that mean to him just because her real son conveniently comes out of his coma?
3) What the hell is an aquabicopter, or whatever it was called? A helicopter that can also go underwater? Again, smells like a convenient plot device to me.
4) Considering New York City had been underwater for however-many years, why was there power in the building they visited? If they had restored power, why was the rest of the city deserted?
5) Why does Spielberg always have to stick on a happy ending?
Anyway, that's my 2 cents. If you want a good recent Spielberg movie, get Catch Me If You Can.
|
05-07-2003, 09:04 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SansGrip
My honest opinion is that Spielberg went off track with A.I. I mean it's not a bad movie, but I think it woulda been a lot better had Kubrick lived long enough to make it himself. Here are the main problems I can see with it:
|
Hi SansGrip! Welcome back man! We were all missing you.
About Kubrick... you could be right, but we will never know.
Quote:
1) It's too long. By about 45 minutes.
2) Are we supposed to care about the boy's "mother"? I mean I know the kid's a robot, but would any non-psychopathic person really be that mean to him just because her real son conveniently comes out of his coma?
3) What the hell is an aquabicopter, or whatever it was called? A helicopter that can also go underwater? Again, smells like a convenient plot device to me.
4) Considering New York City had been underwater for however-many years, why was there power in the building they visited? If they had restored power, why was the rest of the city deserted?
5) Why does Spielberg always have to stick on a happy ending?
|
1) Naahh... I don't think that was a problem.
2) She was too confused and too afraid of the "robot". But you are right she was really mean... psychopathically mean.
3) Exact! A helicopter that can also go underwater! You have just to think that its turbine could handle water as much as air. With their technology I would be surprised if they don't have it.
4) Well that's simple and you just answered it your self. They had power because they had restored it. About the desert city; was it really desert? I don't know. They just didn't show the inside of other buildings, and in my opinion they didn't need to. Sure that could be other companies inside other buildings; in fact the "future robots" were searching and finding bodies over there.
5) You are kidding, aren't you?
I think you noticed how much I like this movie.
Quote:
Anyway, that's my 2 cents. If you want a good recent Spielberg movie, get Catch Me If You Can.
|
I didn't watch this one yet... but usually I don’t like DiCaprio’s performances.
Anyway this one look like to be fun in the trailers that I saw.
|
05-07-2003, 09:08 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muaddib
3) Exact! A helicopter that can also go underwater! You have just to think that its turbine could handle water as much as air.
|
Trouble is, I can't think of much practical use for it -- except to get Osment and Law and the bear underwater .
Quote:
4) Well that's simple and you just answered it your self. They had power because they had restored it.
|
But it didn't look like an inhabited city. It looked deserted. It was still mostly underwater. Why would anyone live or work there? It doesn't make sense to me.
Quote:
5) You are kidding, aren't you?
|
It was rhetorical .
Quote:
ut usually I don’t like DiCaprio’s performances.
|
I don't either, but he's good in this movie -- as good as What's Eating Gilbert Grape?, I reckon.
|
05-07-2003, 09:27 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: São Paulo - Brasil
Posts: 879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SansGrip
Trouble is, I can't think of much practical use for it -- except to get Osment and Law and the bear underwater .
|
Oh man... just use your imagination. I can think in a billion uses for it!
Quote:
It was rhetorical .
|
Thank God, I'm not crazy!
Quote:
Quote:
ut usually I don’t like DiCaprio’s performances.
|
I don't either, but he's good in this movie -- as good as What's Eating Gilbert Grape?, I reckon.
|
I'll watch it.
|
05-07-2003, 11:58 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SansGrip
It was still mostly underwater. Why would anyone live or work there? It doesn't make sense to me.
|
Convenience , just jump out your window, and you have a swimming pool
Welcome back SansGrip
-kwag
|
05-08-2003, 12:32 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West Australia
Posts: 272
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
If you want a good recent Spielberg movie, get Catch Me If You Can
|
Yea saw this the other day, I thought it was very good.
Welcome back Sansgrip.
|
05-08-2003, 05:17 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I just gotta get that movie, after that I'll talk with ya'll about it...
Welcome Back SansGrip
__________________
j3llyG0053
|
05-08-2003, 10:02 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Welcome Back SansGrip
Quote:
Very good movie. Tom Hanks is very good and DiCaprio was borderline
as a sixteen year old.
-bp
|
05-09-2003, 06:00 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I did like DiCaprio in "the quick and the dead". great western.
|
05-09-2003, 10:17 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: T.O. (Da T-Dot)
Posts: 498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by black prince
Welcome Back SansGrip
Quote:
Very good movie. Tom Hanks is very good and DiCaprio was borderline
as a sixteen year old.
-bp
|
better movie than i'd thought it'd be....
but Walken stole the show-----
as usual
ztr
|
05-09-2003, 03:56 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_mero_zooter
but Walken stole the show
|
Speaking of whom, did anyone see The Country Bears? I think I'm the only person on the planet who enjoyed it .
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|