Go Back    Forum > Digital Life > Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
07-12-2007, 02:01 AM
wheezer210 wheezer210 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 101
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
is there anyone here that has a Dual core CPU (AMD Or Intel?)

if you do, and you do video encoding, has it helped speed up the process?

I know they are supposed to be good for multi-tasking.

thanks for any input.
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
07-12-2007, 05:46 AM
manthing manthing is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 329
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
i went from a amd 1.8 GHz Athlon to a intel 1.8 GHz core 2 duo.

generally things have speeded up.
but i would not say dramatically.

say around a 5% increase.

but i also went from a ide harddrive to a raid 0 sata 1.

personally i think the ram & the harddrive is what is slowing you down.
and unless you beef up ram to be the ddr 2 type and sata 2 type harddrive, then its not worth getting a dual (or more) core.

the other benefit is that you can multitask much better, as 2 cores allow more responsiveness in XP.

bottom line, yes you will find an improvement.
but whether it justifies your expenditure... well that is for you to decide.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
07-12-2007, 08:03 AM
wheezer210 wheezer210 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 101
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks...appreciate the input.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
07-12-2007, 08:14 AM
wayshway wayshway is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 100
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to wayshway
I agree with Manthing. I installed a new mother board and a Duo core CPU. It is about 5 percent faster. It stays way cooler now because the Pentium 4 runs super hot.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
07-12-2007, 12:42 PM
lordsmurf's Avatar
lordsmurf lordsmurf is offline
Site Staff | Video
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,633
Thanked 2,458 Times in 2,090 Posts
I have an Intel Dual-Core 1.66 CPU in my laptop. My desktop is a Northwood Intel P4 2.8Ghz 400FSB. The encoding speed on the laptop is about twice as fast, but it still takes hours and hours to encode, where I still have to do it overnight. Audio restoration speeds remained largely unchanged. The only thing that is much faster is transcoding (DVD Shrink), where the laptop can do a disc in 15 minutes that takes the desktop an hour or two.


- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- For sale in the marketplace: TBCs, workflows, capture cards, VCRs
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DVD Audio/Video speed up mrwhitethc Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 3 06-17-2008 12:56 AM




 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM