02-21-2024, 07:28 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 40
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
This thread follows on from my previous thread about testing. Before presenting the final results, I will probably have several questions to help me analyse the results. So as to prevent bias, I have not indicated how these captures were obtained, as suggested by aramkolt in my previous thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aramkolt
The true test I think would be to post unlabeled samples of different popular and some less popular chains all using the same starting VCR/tape and have people determine for themselves what is visually the best to them so that any bias on equipment choice is removed.
|
Attached are six images: three images taken from two different captures...
Video 9a
Video 9b
Video 9c
Video 11a
Video 11b
Video 11c
Ques 1
Why are there horizontal black lines through the letters of Video 9a, but not Video 11a? What could be the cause?
The "b" & "c" captures do not show such lines.
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Ads / Sponsors
|
|
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
02-22-2024, 05:08 PM
|
|
Site Staff | Video
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,707
Thanked 2,471 Times in 2,101 Posts
|
|
That's not lines, that's interlace.
It's expected, desired, proper. It's not an error, nor a problem.
|
02-22-2024, 06:54 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 40
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
More questions, then, about that interlacing. I want to understand all the imperfections in these captures as well as I can.
Ques 2
Because Video 11a does not show the interlacing, I assume that means it is an inferior capture. Correct?
Ques 3
What explains the fact that the letters in 9a are two fields higher than 11a? The letters are actually taller. Is this another indication that Video 11a is inferior, that the extra height has been blurred away?
Ques 4
The specs I saw on one VCR player, stated that the vertical resolution was 200 lines. A better player, I think, stated 250 lines. If that's the case, how can any capture from a VCR display 576 lines*?
Is it like that 1975 song from Pilot: "Ho ho ho it's magic"?
* I measured the fields in Video 9a using a ruler in Photoshop at 500% magnification, each capital letter was 34 fields high. Then I zoomed out, measured again, and extrapolated. There are approximately 560 fields in Video 9a, so we can say 576.
|
02-22-2024, 07:25 PM
|
|
Site Staff | Video
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,707
Thanked 2,471 Times in 2,101 Posts
|
|
2. Interlaced is state of being. Interlacing lines do not always appear unless motion reveals it.
3. All you attached were images. So no idea. Multiple potential reasons, everything from timing differences in capture, to jitter, to other reasons. Not many details to go on here.
4. "lines" is an analog term, nothing to do with digital. VHS lines are set at 240, which is essentially ~352x in digital terms. (As in 352x480. In the old days, people confused "240 lines" with the wrong axis of x240, as in 352x240 VCDs.) Those are NTSC numbers, PAL is slightly different.
|
02-22-2024, 08:08 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 317
Thanked 38 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Hmm. For the actual quality test - You might consider capturing test patterns (which I believe some contain motion) from something like the "Video essentials" DVD which is widely available online for $5 shipped: https://www.ebay.com/itm/275960861497
Using a DVD will give you a very stable signal to capture and that will tell you what the quality will look like from an "ideal" source. You'd later want to see what happens when you have a VHS source instead, so record those DVD test patterns to a VHS tape and then try capturing the VHS tape with the same setup. There will absolutely be some quality loss when recording and playing back, but you can compare to see which card gives the most stable and best quality image from the same VHS.
Reason I like the Video Essentials DVD is that it is cheap, widely available, and will likely show you some artifacts and color issues that you might not see with most regular tape footage. That, and since it is widely available, other users can capture the same thing and post to show if they got better results capturing from DVD than you did with the capture chains that you are testing.
Ideally you'd want to post short video clips if it's just a few seconds, that way we can determine if you are getting clipped while levels or if there are interlacing capturing issues. Screenshots are also fine to show how detail is, but video files will always give more information.
I'll post some captures from my Video Essentials DVD once I see some of yours if you want to compare.
I believe the pattern with motion that can show a lot of defects at once is this one from snell and Wilcox and I'm pretty sure it is on the Video Essentials DVD as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObtBIBuqiWU
|
02-22-2024, 08:49 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 220
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
You should go read the entire guide on this site. It you are having questions like what interlacing is then you well learn a lot from reading the guide.
|
02-26-2024, 08:51 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 40
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the responses. Two were two problems:
- I had confused the stated horizontal resolution (250 for my PAL player) with the number of horizontal lines. So, thinking that my tapes only had 250 horizontal lines, I couldn't explain how it could resolve 576 fields, the interlacing.
- Another problem was that Premiere stated the file was P, progressive. Yet it was showing interlacing in the timeline. That confused me even more.
Anyway, all that's now sorted out. My player has a resolution of 250 x 576 and I can't trust Premiere to tell me whether a file is Progressive or Interlaced.
This thread can now come to an end.
|
02-26-2024, 09:37 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 400
Thanked 77 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
250 lines of luma resolution (lines per picture height) is about 333 pixels across (250x4/3). So that makes it 333 x 576. But you should capture at at least double the horizontal analog resolution to get all the detail from the source, so 666+ x 576. Therefore, 720 x 576 is good.
|
02-27-2024, 09:56 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 1,700
Thanked 370 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Consider MEDIAINFO software to report video file details.
NTSC VHS was generally considered to provide about 240 lines of horizontal (B&W) resolution, and on a good day perhaps 50 lines of color resolution. S-VHS increased the B&W to about 400 lines and left the color the same. MiniDV bumped the B&W to ~500 lines, and color to about 120 lines with 8-bit color depth but added compression artifacts. NTSC broadcast was perhaps 330 lines of B&W and maybe 80 lines of color.
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
AJA Kona LHi video won't show?
|
bstegner |
Capture, Record, Transfer |
16 |
01-23-2024 02:46 PM |
Topaz Video AI tests?
|
qwertz73 |
Restore, Filter, Improve Quality |
21 |
06-01-2023 08:16 AM |
Neat Video 5 VirtualDub tests
|
jjdd |
Capture, Record, Transfer |
13 |
12-07-2019 10:04 PM |
Get video, histogram to show at same time in VirtualDub?
|
stevevid |
Capture, Record, Transfer |
1 |
09-15-2018 05:43 AM |
Re-encoding (re-DCT) video tests
|
admin |
Encode, Convert for discs |
2 |
12-11-2010 08:41 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM
|