01-03-2003, 01:49 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I have really good results with the x2 704x480 template, but I have seen several comments that the x3 template is just as good (or better) when viewed on the TV. My question is this: why would a reduced resolution produce identical results? When I viewed samples from both templates on my monitor, the x2 output looked better.
I haven't put any XVCD's together with x3, but I will be more than willing to give it, a try (with the proper convincing).
So, convince me! Is the advantage to be found in a shorter encoding time, reduced block noise, smaller file size, what's the appeal?
Thanks in advance for this; I'm still a hopeless Noob
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
01-03-2003, 09:43 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno
So, convince me!
|
Less mosquito noise, fewer macroblocks, less overall blockiness, shorter encoding time, higher CQ/CQ_VBR level, longer playing time.
|
01-03-2003, 04:09 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Holy smokes!!
Yep, that did it. All further projects will be x3.
Thanks, Sansgrip!!
|
01-03-2003, 06:40 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Mine too. Have just finished Spiderman. Over two hours, almost fullscreen and the quality is very acceptable.
(eventhou the final quality was 7.77)
Very nice job the gurus in here!!!
Keep on going.
Gaudi
|
01-03-2003, 11:28 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I can now testify that I was a complete fool using the x2 template. The quality on 'Super Troopers' is nothing short of gorgeous!! Granted, since I am still mostly a complete fool, I chose to activate Tempgenc's color-correct AND noise reduction filters, and I am now looking at a 25-hour encoding time for a 98 min movie...
I can be VERY patient when it comes to better results....
Thanks to Sansgrip and Kwag, and all the rest of you merciless, unstoppable video gods!!
|
01-03-2003, 11:54 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno
I chose to activate Tempgenc's color-correct AND noise reduction filters
|
Colour-correction and noise reduction can both be done as easily and more effectively through a variety of Avisynth filters. Personally I like FluxSmooth. Did I mention that already?
|
01-03-2003, 11:55 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno
Thanks to Sansgrip and Kwag, and all the rest of you merciless, unstoppable video gods!!
|
Btw, you should probably put kwag's name (and the names of others) before mine. Just take a look at the date I joined the forum...
|
01-04-2003, 12:04 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SansGrip
Btw, you should probably put kwag's name (and the names of others) before mine. Just take a look at the date I joined the forum...
|
No way SansGrip . I started a little snowball and you and many others have made it into a huge avalanche
-kwag
|
01-04-2003, 12:19 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Very well....
ALL HAIL THE GRAND HIGH POOBAH OF VIDEO - KWAG! KWAG! KWAG!
Prostrate yourselves before the man who started it all!!!
Seriously, Kwag, you are a life saver!! I am so happy I found out about you and your disciples....
TWO! FOUR! SIX! EIGHT! WHO DO WE APPRECIATE!? KWAG!!!! KWAG!!!! KWAAAAAAAAG!!!!
|
01-04-2003, 12:19 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
No way SansGrip . I started a little snowball
|
I just got a 2h20m movie on one disc at 528x480 with very good quality. I wouldn't call that a little snowball .
|
01-04-2003, 12:22 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SansGrip
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno
I chose to activate Tempgenc's color-correct AND noise reduction filters
|
Colour-correction and noise reduction can both be done as easily and more effectively through a variety of Avisynth filters. Personally I like FluxSmooth. Did I mention that already?
|
I know, I know....
But I am loath to learn an all new program just yet. If you can steer me in the direction of a good thread based on this technology, I'd be grateful.
Did I mention I was a complete idiot?
|
01-04-2003, 12:26 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reno
But I am loath to learn an all new program just yet.
|
Once you get used to it Avisynth is so easy you'll be amazed you ever felt intimidated. Go here and download 2.07 and install it as per the instructions, then read some of The Giant Threads(tm) for good scripts to use.
If you need help, and it's about Avisynth in general, shout in the Avisynth forum. If it's about one of my filters specifically (Blockbuster, FluxSmooth, Sampler, etc.) shout in SansGrip's Filters forum and I'll see what I can do.
Quote:
Did I mention I was a complete idiot?
|
You did, but I don't believe it .
|
01-04-2003, 01:05 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
All right, SansGrip, I downloaded the scary new software addition to my desktop, per your instructions. I have no doubt that you are right in recommending this, but I fear you've overestimated my end-user skills
I'll work at it, and I hope to deliver good news soon...
|
01-04-2003, 01:14 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
SansGrip,
BTW, thanks for offering your help. Hope I don't need it (I probably will LOL), but nice to know it's there....
|
01-08-2003, 11:57 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
on the KVCD X3...
What is the lowest CQ setting you would goto before you split it up on more CD's?
I've used 11 for my lowest and it looks great on a normal 32" Television.
|
01-09-2003, 12:30 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hi KingTuk,
The best thing to do is to look at your encoded prediction sample. If it looks good for one CD, leave it. If not, then go for 2 CDs
-kwag
|
01-09-2003, 01:47 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm encoding K-19 right now, at 15 (lowest I've had it). I may have to run it through again, It's almost done and the file size (video only) is Over 700 megs. Hopefully I can add the audio and keep it small enough to burn!
I'll keep that 11 minimum in mind if it comes to that!
|
01-09-2003, 08:19 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTuk
What is the lowest CQ setting you would goto before you split it up on more CD's?
|
I've never had to go to more discs. I usually just drop the resolution. But if you don't want to do that, I'd say base your decision on how the sample looks, not what the number is. If you see too many artifacts then go to two discs.
The only way of knowing what is "too many" is to encode lots and lots of samples at different quality levels, then play them on your TV. You'll soon pick up a feeling for what is acceptable and what isn't.
Quote:
I've used 11 for my lowest and it looks great on a normal 32" Television.
|
I assume you mean CQ_VBR. I've gone as low as 8-9, but that's pushing it. I'd rather stay in the teens.
|
01-09-2003, 09:37 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@Reno
I encoded K19 with the latest 704x480 template using clip borders in Tmpgenc. Here's the template.
LoadPlugin("D:\Downloads\FitCD\MPEG2DEC.dll")
LoadPlugin("d:\downloads\fluxsmooth\fluxsmooth.dll ")
LoadPlugin("d:\downloads\sampler\sampler.dll")
LoadPlugin("d:\downloads\legalclip\legalclip.dll")
mpeg2source("D:\Movies\Vob\K19\K19.d2v")
LegalClip()
BilinearResize(672,352,0,0,720,480)
FluxSmooth()
AddBorders(16,64,16,64)
LegalClip()
Got it on 1 disk with excellent quality.
-Yoda
__________________
May the code force be with you
|
01-09-2003, 03:19 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Mucho thanks Yoda!!
I'll try that out.
Oh, one more (really dumb noob) question; you appear to have loaded some of Sansgrip's filters in Tempgenc. I thought those where written for Avisynth! They're supported? Argghh...
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|