|
07-14-2002, 10:52 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san jose, Ca
Posts: 1,148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Avisynth is fast and there are filters for it that tmpgenc doesn't have. The encoding is slow as it is- I don't want to slow it down anymore with resize, smoother, etc. The extra step with fitcd, avisynth only takes about 1 extra minute 
|
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2002, 11:11 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
When I tried to test resize directly in TMPGenc I got either messed up video or HUGE letter box video tests. Source is 16:9 30fps. Used the KVCD-CQ-352x480-_NTSCFilm_-BETA.mcf. BTW, the betas rock!!!!
TMPGenc Source tests: (Output on all set at 4:3)
1:1 Center Keep = messed up
1:1 Full Keep = HUGE letter box
16:9 Center Keep = messed up
16:9 Full Keep = HUGE letter box
4:3 Center Keep = messed up
4:3 Full Keep = HUGE letter box
What did I do wrong?
__________________
Thanks!
reman
|
|
07-14-2002, 11:38 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reman
When I tried to test resize directly in TMPGenc I got either messed up video or HUGE letter box video tests. Source is 16:9 30fps. Used the KVCD-CQ-352x480-_NTSCFilm_-BETA.mcf. BTW, the betas rock!!!!
TMPGenc Source tests: (Output on all set at 4:3)
1:1 Center Keep = messed up
1:1 Full Keep = HUGE letter box
16:9 Center Keep = messed up
16:9 Full Keep = HUGE letter box
4:3 Center Keep = messed up
4:3 Full Keep = HUGE letter box
What did I do wrong?
|
Hi reman:
Use Center(custom size) 352x352 
-kwag
|
|
07-14-2002, 11:52 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kwag
Use Center(custom size) 352x352 -kwag |
See! Now I know why you are the pro! 
What I do not understand is how a 720x480 16:9 DVD rip formats properly into 352x352 
__________________
Thanks!
reman
|
|
07-14-2002, 11:59 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reman
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kwag
Use Center(custom size) 352x352 -kwag |
See! Now I know why you are the pro!
What I do not understand is how a 720x480 16:9 DVD rip formats properly into 352x352 |
Use FitCD to open your .d2v, and you'll see that if you select the target as 352x480 (1/2 DVD), the resize options selected will be 352x352.
The line will look something like this: BilinearResize( 352,352,0,0,720,480)
-kwag
|
|
07-14-2002, 12:23 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kwag
Use FitCD to open your .d2v, and you'll see that if you select the target as 352x480 (1/2 DVD), the resize options selected will be 352x352.
The line will look something like this: BilinearResize(352,352,0,0,720,480)-kwag
|
Well, actually it states:
IF Anamorphic is checked BilinearResize(320,320,0,0,720,480)
Anamorphic NOT checked BilinearResize(320,448,17,0,686,480)
Now what?
__________________
Thanks!
reman
|
|
07-14-2002, 12:31 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
320x320 
I think you have the "blocks overscan" set to 1 or 2. It has to be set to 0.
This is in FitCD.
-kwag
|
|
07-14-2002, 12:58 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Indeed!!
IF Anamorphic & ITU are checked BilinearResize(352,352,0,0,720,480)
__________________
Thanks!
reman
|
|
07-16-2002, 11:33 PM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
pearl harbor with 720x480 is 1,726,389 video only. 3 cd's.
|
|
07-17-2002, 01:36 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Smoochie3
pearl harbor with 720x480 is 1,726,389 video only. 3 cd's.
|
Aha!. And that's a 3 hour movie!. The perfect template for "Pearl Harbor" would have been the KVCD 352x480 Plus. Because it would fit perfectly in 2 CD's. 
-kwag
|
|
07-17-2002, 04:48 AM
|
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 832
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by twobit326
I just encoded the first half (1h30m) of LOTR with 704x480 KVCDx2 beta. (But I changed to CQ and put it on 70) The total file size was 950 megs. Also I put audio to 224 kbps. I looked at 128 kbps and it iddn't make that much of a difference to get it on 1 disc. This stinks b/c now it'll take 4 discs. (B/c the original file i got was 2 files.)
BTW, my webspace is being gay so I can't give you that demo of it Kwag. 
Another thing I noticed was when I sent it through TMPEG it got darker than the original video.
Oh, well, things to ponder.
P.S. I encoded a few things on the VBR_CQ setting and it looked great but with LOTR I noticed a huge quality difference. Also remember that LOTR has a lot of fast motion scenes.
-Twobit326 |
in regards to the video brightness you can easily correct this in tmpgenc, and I got the lotr dvd screener and that spans over 4 80 mins discs.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|
