Quote:
Originally Posted by AgNa
the only thing I don`t like to much is how much time takes me to get the correct QC to encode (about 12 minutes per sample) and the fact I need to make like 4 samples to get the righ CQ.
|
yeah, I know what you mean- that's why I'm not using the Dust or Convolution filters because it takes forever for each sample. I've been using FluxSmooth and TemporalSmoother- they're much faster. I wonder what the size difference would be between using fast filters (or none
) for the samples, and the final encode with Dust, Convolution3D, TemporalCleaner or whatever?
-ren