06-04-2003, 05:55 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm currently trying out the asharp's adaptive sharpening. If it works as advertized ( ), then I'll turn it on. From the readme file of asharp, here's what it does:
- adaptive thresholding to avoid noise enhancement
- block adaptive sharpenning to avoid DCT block edges enhancement
- block based adaptive thresholding to avoid DCT block edges enhancement
So this combination, together with the adaptive filtering (bluring) on action and scene changes, should be a killer
-kwag
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
06-04-2003, 06:31 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Note: The first line of "asharp" in the script should read: asharp(2,0) and not asharp(1,0).
I fixed that.
|
06-04-2003, 07:17 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@Kwag
you wrote:
"@all,
Thanks for your patience"
are you kidding?
we all are thankfull for your great work.
without your friendship and developing,
this forum couldn't never be so great.
thanks for the script update too.
@audioslave
i ever use bicubic precise in all my tests and in the last encodes.
@all
great work!
i'm thankfull
the Kwag team is the best.
|
06-04-2003, 07:27 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I just did a couple of tests using asharp.
Test Basics: (Current Script)
kvcdX3 - MPEG1 CQ=80 Sample Length=1656 Frames (69 seconds)
MinBitrate=300, Max Bitrate=2500, VBV=40, GOP 1-5823-2-1-24
Filesize with asharp(2,0) = 8,653,029
Filesize with asharp(2,2) = 7,236,833 (16.37% smaller)
kvcdX3 - MPEG2 CQ=80 Sample Length=1656 Frames (69 seconds)
MinBitrate=600, Max Bitrate=6000, VBV=224, GOP 1-5823-2-1-18
Filesize with asharp(2,0) = 19,076,155
Filesize with asharp(2,2) = 15,308,597 (19.75% smaller)
I don't see much difference in quality (but I don't have the best eyes. )
I think that adaptive shapening is the way to go with asharp.
Racer99
|
06-04-2003, 07:31 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer99
I don't see much difference in quality (but I don't have the best eyes. )
I think that adaptive shapening is the way to go with asharp.
Racer99
|
I did turn on adaptive shapening as asharp(2,4). The script was just updated with that. Also the small sample I just posted, was done that way
-kwag
|
06-04-2003, 08:11 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Latest correction: I was passing bluring variables as INT instead of FLOAT
The scaling on blurring was incorrect, as it was in harder steps ( -1, -2, -3, etc. ).
Fixed. It's now floating point values ( -1.12, -2.142, etc. )
-kwag
|
06-04-2003, 10:23 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
hey Kwag,
i don't test the "very new" yet, i see it only now.
the last script before your corrections
give some staircases like in lanczos, did you see some like this?
i see it in detail in 352x240.
with more "resize" this thin lines with staircases are hard to see.
can i encode a movie using 720x480 in one cdr80 or
cdr90 with audio in 160k and got good result
i'm asking cos never did with more than 480x480.
i did only samples in pc and the results are incredibles.
i never see this resolution in the tv.
ps:
i got a new player phillips and he play all kvcds.
i did a big search to find what was the best.
2 weeks testing with tons of kvcds in the shops,
i post it in the portuguese forum.
the important now isn't the dvd player.
the best is the kvcd player
@racer,
i'm with you!
asharp(2,2) ... (2,4) give more sharp and less size!
i think that (2,2) is a "gently" sharpness.
|
06-04-2003, 10:45 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
can i encode a movie using 720x480 in one cdr80 or
cdr90 with audio in 160k and got good result
|
Try it
The "Red Planet" samples I posted were all 704x480 with a CQ for one 80 minute CD
Audio at 112Kbps.
-kwag
|
06-04-2003, 11:08 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
can i encode a movie using 720x480 in one cdr80 or
cdr90 with audio in 160k and got good result
|
Try it
The "Red Planet" samples I posted were all 704x480 with a CQ for one 80 minute CD
Audio at 112Kbps.
-kwag
|
sample very clear Kwag.
what CQ did you find in the sample
|
06-04-2003, 11:15 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
sample very clear Kwag.
what CQ did you find in the sample
|
All were around CQ ~62 to ~63. I think I posted the CQ besides some of the samples
-kwag
|
06-05-2003, 01:52 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
God I was testing the whole night, and now everything has changed again...
well as for noise reduction and sharpness, I found that this line would best replace Unfilter(50,50) :
Code:
Unfilter(10,10)
asharp(1.25,4,1,hqbf=true)
you might still wanna test it...
__________________
j3llyG0053
|
06-05-2003, 02:05 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellygoose
God I was testing the whole night, and now everything has changed again...
well as for noise reduction and sharpness, I found that this line would best replace Unfilter(50,50) :
Code:
Unfilter(10,10)
asharp(1.25,4,1,hqbf=true)
you might still wanna test it...
|
Hi Jellygoose,
Did you see the latest one: asharp(2, 4, 0.25, hqbf=true)
Have you tested that one
It seems that asharp is way faster than unfilter
-kwag
|
06-05-2003, 02:12 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
currently testing...
__________________
j3llyG0053
|
06-05-2003, 02:16 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellygoose
currently testing...
|
I just did a new clip of "Red Planet" with the new script, and it looks
-kwag
|
06-05-2003, 02:26 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 725
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@kwag
So what are you waiting for?! Show us a clip, man!
EDIT: Would be nice with info on CQ etc.
|
06-05-2003, 02:28 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioslave
@kwag
So what are you waiting for?! Show us a clip, man!
EDIT: Would be nice with info on CQ etc.
|
Will do Give me about 15 minutes...
-kwag
|
06-05-2003, 02:29 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 725
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
06-05-2003, 02:46 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ok, this one should top just about every other sample ever made at KVCD.Net
www.kvcd.net/red-planet-extreme-704x480.mpg
Specs:
31 second sample, 3,838KB. Res. 704x480, CQ=63.42, MIN bitrate 300Kbps, MAX bitrate 2,500Kbps
KVCD "Notch" Q. Matrix. GOP 1-12-2-1-24, Current script as posted Ver. June 5, 2003 @05:45GMT
-kwag
|
06-05-2003, 02:48 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 725
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@kwag
I didn't have any luck with squeezing "A Knight's Tale" onto one CDR . When I made the prediction I got a CQ value 25-30(!) for one CDR, and I guess that won't be very exciting to look at... If a movie contains a lot of fast action scenes will it be easier to fit on a single disc?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|