01-05-2003, 01:49 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Kwag,
can you post the "last" script lbr for dvd2svcd or
the last recomendations like:
matrix,gop,prediction,vbr or cbr,.....etc!
please,thanks.
|
Someday, 12:01 PM
|
|
Site Staff / Ad Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
|
01-05-2003, 02:06 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
Kwag,
can you post the "last" script lbr for dvd2svcd or
the last recomendations like:
matrix,gop,prediction,vbr or cbr,.....etc!
please,thanks.
|
Hi jorel,
Load the original lbr .ini file that I had posted, and change the GOP to 1-12-2-1-24, manually make the BETA-1 "notch" matrix changes, and chahge to CQ mode. Then save your new lbr .ini file.
Here are the changes on the matrix:
Code:
8 6 8
6 7 10
8 10 14
Those changes are on the far left top of the matrix.
-kwag
|
01-05-2003, 02:44 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
really thank-full!
|
01-05-2003, 09:37 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Kwag,
i encode with the "news" .
change only this :
gop,matrix and cbr in the script
and compare (the same film) with the "olds"
the new is not too good as the old.
less size in the new encode but,the image "smokes".
when someone turn the face, seems "ondulations" in the face
and in all movimentations.
what could be?
|
01-05-2003, 10:06 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
gop,matrix and cbr in the script
|
What exactly do you mean by cbr
-kwag
|
01-05-2003, 10:17 PM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
gop,matrix and cbr in the script
|
What exactly do you mean by cbr
-kwag
|
isn't cbr
is
rate contreol mode = constant quality (cq)
see? i'm going mad...... :tongue2:
|
01-05-2003, 11:45 PM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
gop,matrix and cbr in the script
|
What exactly do you mean by cbr
-kwag
|
isn't cbr
is
rate contreol mode = constant quality (cq)
see? i'm going mad...... :tongue2:
|
Ah!, then it's ok. I thought you were encoding CBR ( Constant Bit Rate )
|
01-06-2003, 02:51 AM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
but:
"the new is not too good as the old."
i do something wrong?
i "turn" the rate control mode to: automatic vbr (cq_vbr),
reencode again......seems better!
i forgot something?
thanks in advance!
|
01-06-2003, 03:00 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
but:
"the new is not too good as the old."
i do something wrong?
i "turn" the rate control mode to: automatic vbr (cq_vbr),
reencode again......seems better!
i forgot something?
thanks in advance!
|
If you're encoding 352x240, CQ_VBR is better. Over that resolution, go CQ
If you're going to compare a clip made with CQ and another one made with CQ_VBR, be sure that they are both the same size before you judge the quality
-kwag
|
01-06-2003, 03:04 AM
|
Invalid Email / Banned / Spammer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brasil - MG - third stone from the sun
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwag
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
but:
"the new is not too good as the old."
i do something wrong?
i "turn" the rate control mode to: automatic vbr (cq_vbr),
reencode again......seems better!
i forgot something?
thanks in advance!
|
If you're encoding 352x240, CQ_VBR is better. Over that resolution, go CQ
If you're going to compare a clip made with CQ and another one made with CQ_VBR, be sure that they are both the same size before you judge the quality
-kwag
|
yes they are in same size(little dif),
and cq_vbr is better (352x240).
thank you!!
|
01-06-2003, 03:19 AM
|
Free Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorel
yes they are in same size(little dif),
and cq_vbr is better (352x240).
thank you!!
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM — vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
|