Quantcast KVCD: Motion Search Position Options? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
05-06-2003, 11:44 PM
RAVEN2K2 RAVEN2K2 is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey Kwag I was wondering, when you encode your movies using kvcd templates what option do you use for motion search position. Is high quality (slow) worth it, or do you think high quality (very slow) is really worth it, i want quality I don't care how long the encoding takes, thanks! Is there a noticable difference!
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
05-07-2003, 12:09 AM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Use "High quality". Don't use "Highest quality". It's a waste of time, and you won't see any visual quality gain.

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #3  
05-07-2003, 09:12 AM
Jellygoose Jellygoose is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It actually produces a bigger filesize than "High Quality"
__________________
j3llyG0053
Reply With Quote
  #4  
05-07-2003, 09:22 AM
telemike telemike is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to telemike
What's the difference between "normal" and "motion search estimate"? I can't spare the time to use the High Quality mode.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
05-07-2003, 12:06 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by telemike
What's the difference between "normal" and "motion search estimate"? I can't spare the time to use the High Quality mode.
You'll get faster encoding speed with "motion search estimate", but the file size will be much larger and you get less quality ( using a same CQ value as "normal" for reference ).

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #6  
05-08-2003, 09:59 AM
telemike telemike is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to telemike
So, normal would be better than motion search estimate?
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
motion search precision in tmpgenc? Adder Video Encoding and Conversion 10 01-08-2004 10:34 AM
Motion Search Precision Anonymous Video Konvertierung und Encodieren (Deutsch) 0 06-03-2003 09:52 AM
KVCD: Motion search precision settings in tmpgenc? Boulder Video Encoding and Conversion 3 01-05-2003 11:14 AM
KVCD Templates - tmpgenc, No motion search? jrv331 Video Encoding and Conversion 0 11-15-2002 01:12 PM
TMPGEnc: Motion Search Precision - Highest Qual or Motion Est Search MoovyGuy Video Encoding and Conversion 1 08-28-2002 11:00 PM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd