Go Back    Forum > Digital Video > Videography: Cameras, TVs and Players

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
03-01-2011, 05:22 PM
kaliree kaliree is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 91
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
I assume many of the staff and forum members here have experience working on video productions (clearly, there are many who have experience with post production). So, I have a production question:

What are your recommendations for a portable audio recorder with at least basic mixing capability (level meters, gain, etc), at least two XLR inputs for mics and will provide phantom power to two or more mics?

I have been running mics to XLR cables from the camera to the mics, but this can interfere with some shots and my flexibility with the camera (at least if I want to keep consistent audio - which obviously I do). I have seen many portable XLR mixer-recorders, but even the cheapest are generally a couple hundred dollars, so I wanted to get some feedback from the more experienced folks here first.

I have also been considering a switch to HD via a DSLR, which generally do not have good options for on-camera audio or on-camera audio adapters. A portable audio source could solve that issue.

Thanks for the feedback!
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Ads / Sponsors
 
Join Date: ∞
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
03-04-2011, 04:34 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Site Staff | Web Development
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 654 Times in 457 Posts
You're going to make break out my archived issues and tearsheets from Broadcast Engineering.

Most of my experience in this area comes with reading about it (not online in random places, but in broadcaster and videography magazines), as well as working with people who shot the videos that I edit and prepare for distribution (encoding). Not that my advice is bad, just feel the ethical need to drop in that little disclaimer.

What are you looking to spend?
And then how small is portable supposed to be?

Right off-hand, my thoughts go to Tascam.
Look at this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...3167/KBID/4166

It's $373 + shipping
40GB
embedded CD-RW burner
XLR + phantom power
Basic effects

I used something similar to this back in 2008, and I think it was a Tascam. It was just a day project, a quick event. I sat in the control room (not something I do often), and took all the tapes and discs for edit when it was done. Had it encoded and uploaded for the "live" re-broadcast the next day. (Don't ask me why it was "live" when it was the next day -- your guess is as good as mine. Some clients are weirdos.)

- Did this site help you? Then upgrade to Premium Member and show your support!
- Also: Like Us on Facebook for special DVD/Blu-ray news and deals!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
03-04-2011, 04:42 PM
kpmedia's Avatar
kpmedia kpmedia is offline
Site Staff | Web Hosting, Photo
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,311
Thanked 374 Times in 341 Posts
Quote:
I have also been considering a switch to HD via a DSLR
Only if you want more B roll.

The rolling shutters, lack of good/any auto focus (AF), and limited runtimes on recordings make DSLRs a nuisance for any serious shooting. I know there have been articles, and whole episodes of shows shot on them, etc -- but honestly I think it was all for show. The people who did that could afford better cameras. The SLRs were also so heavily converted with third-party pieces that you couldn't even see the SLR beneath all the add-ons.

Us normal shooters -- not studio TV production -- would be better off with a really nice true video camera that has been modded to take SLR lenses (assuming you need/want the depth of field). I've not gotten into this, mostly for lack of funds. Note that I have a Nikon D3s, and I've shot with some of the other Canon and Nikon bodies. Coincidentally, I'll try out a 5D Mk II tonight, for the first time. I think that's the only body I've not yet used.

Did Red ever finish their DSLR body? I gave up a year ago already.
(EDIT: Just looked at Red.com. Nope! Vaporware, as far as I'm concerned.)

- Did my advice help you? Then become a Premium Member and support this site.
- Please Like Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter

- Need a good web host? Ask me for help! Get the shared, VPS, semi-dedicated, cloud, or reseller you need.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
03-04-2011, 08:11 PM
kaliree kaliree is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 91
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Yeah, DSLR's aren't quite where I'd like them to be just yet. They are improving their video capabilities rapidly, however. I don't have the money for a high end HD video camera or a DSLR right, but I'm thinking ahead. For the moment I just have a borrowed Canon XL1s.

As for the audio, the Tascam is quite nice, but not quite what I was looking for. I was hoping to buy one of the portable XLR mixers that you can wear on a belt. A truly mobile XLR solution. Something like this (I have no idea if this is a good model, but it's an example):

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/PMD661/
Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recommended upload video format for maximum sound quality on youtube waigy Encode, Convert for streaming 21 09-01-2010 03:37 PM
Editing in Vegas Pro 9, recommended storage space, typical times for rendering video? merchantord Edit Video, Audio 9 08-31-2010 06:27 PM
AVT-8710 what are recommended settings ? Tafflad Restore, Filter, Improve Quality 5 02-12-2010 12:51 PM
Portable DVD Player suggestions!!!!! MOTUfan Videography: Cameras, TVs and Players 3 11-21-2005 03:51 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM